http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 남양우 ( Nam Ryangwoo ) (검색결과 4 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
남양우 ( Nam¸ Ryangwoo ) 한국중국언어학회 2020 중국언어연구 Vol.0 No.91
This paper discussed a complete sentence and sentence-completing elements in modern Chinese. A complete sentence is the sentence that can be used independently without the help of another language environment. In order for the sentence to become a complete sentence, various sentence-completing elements are involved. Since the sentence-completing elements corresponding to individual sentences may be different, a theory is needed to explain them in an integrated manner. In the text, we discussed some theories like information theory, time anchoring principle, grounding theory, boundary theory. Each of the pros and cons exists, but what is now most widely accepted is the boundary theory. The boundary theory bifurcates nouns, verbs, adjectives and events as being bounded and unbound through the criteria of 'boundaryness'. And according to the boundary theory, there is a tendency to match bounded ones with bounded ones, unbounded ones with unbounded ones. The boundary theory can explain much of the complete sentence by the simple criterion of 'boundaryness'. But as 陆俭明(2014) points out, there are problems that have not yet been solved. Further research is also required on other boundary factors, such as adverb, modal verb, as presented in this paper. This paper raised the possibility of hierarchy between boundary elements through instances. When multiple boundary elements exist in a sentence, the hierarchy can resolve conflicts between them. Thus, the hierarchical problem of boundary element is also a task that the boundary theory should improve in the future.
-
현대 중국어 비전형적 이중목적어 구문 고찰 : O1이 장소목적어인 경우를 중심으로
남양우 ( Nam¸ Ryangwoo ) 한국외국어대학교 중국연구소 2021 中國硏究 Vol.88 No.-
Construction grammar claims that a language consists of constructions. In particular, simple clause constructions can be expanded either internally or externally. This paper explores the generative mechanisms and characteristics of ‘place recipient-double object construction’ based on this perspective. This construction was first influenced by the typical double-objective construction. Chinese double objective constructions have high expandability, so it is polysemous, ‘place recipient-double object construction’ also has a polysemous relationship with the double-objective construction. In addition, this construction was influenced by the fugitive construction and ‘possessor-subject possessee-object’ construction, they are connected metaphorically to each other. This paper compared the relevant constructions which are ‘ba’ construction and ‘S+在NP+V+O’ construction to reveal the individual characteristics of the ‘place recipient-double object construction’. ‘place recipient-double object construction’ and ‘ba’ construction can commonly mean ‘movement of a theme from an agent to a place’, but the difference between the two constructions is the information value of O2. In A, the subject argument is of no informational value to the listener because it is an old information. ‘ba’ construction's theme is old information, so it has no informational value to the listener. On the other hand, ‘place recipient-double object construction’'s theme is new information, so it has informational value to the listener. ‘place recipient-double object construction’ and ‘S+在NP+V+O’ construction differ in terms of the prominence of place. In ‘S+在NP+V+O’ construction, a place argument is not profiled and it just functions as ground. On the other hand, a place argument of ‘place recipient-double object construction’ is a remarkable participant profiled as part of the whole process. This reflects the cognitive differences of speakers who perceive the same event differently.
-
남양우 ( Nam Ryangwoo ) 한국중국언어학회 2020 중국언어연구 Vol.0 No.89
This paper discussed the construction polysemy and the construction expansion based on previous study about individual constructions. The construction has its construction meaning, which can be extended from central sense to expanded sense. We can explain polysemy of the construction through core meaning and meaning chains, like vocabularies. The construction can also be expanded under the influence of other constructions. The construction expansion can be divided into four types. First type is that two constructions have same form but their arguments are different. Second type is that two constructions have different form but their arguments are same. Third type is that two constructions have different argument but one construction is subpart of the other construction. Forth type is that two constructions have different form and argument, but they are metaphorically involved. Polysemy of some constructions can not be explained by core meaning and meaning chains, these constructions are influenced by expansion of the construction itself and external forces. The construction may be expanded with a complex influence from multiple constructions in the process of expansion. And some constructions have polysemy and construction expansion together. In conclusion, the construction polysemy and the construction expansion show complex aspects in which the constructions continue to develop as they interact with each other.
-
현대중국어 ‘피(被)’자 피동문에 관한 고찰 - 구문문법 관점을 중심으로
남양우 ( Nam Ryangwoo ) 한국외국어대학교 중국연구소 2021 中國硏究 Vol.86 No.-
This paper discussed ‘bei’ construction of modern Chinese based on construction grammar. The traditional view regards ‘NP1+被NP2 +VP’ construction and ‘NP1+被+VP’ construction as same category, but we claimed that ‘NP1+被NP2 +VP’ construction and ‘NP1+被+VP’ construction are different. The reasons for this are explained in terms of construction form, construction arguments, and construction meaning. In previous studies, there was a debate over which is a typical ‘bei’ construction. However, when construction grammar is applied, this debate is unnecessary because ‘NP1+被NP2 +VP’ and ‘NP1+被+VP’ are separate construction. Just because ‘NP1+被NP2 +VP’ and ‘NP1+被+VP’ are separate construction does not mean they are irrelevant. Construction grammar allow us to capture how the two constructions are interrelated, recognizing the individual characteristics of ‘NP1+被NP2 +VP’ and ‘NP1+被+VP’. Formally, it has changed from ‘NP1+被+VP’ to ‘NP1+被NP2 +VP’. Semantically, it has changed from an early negative meaning to a neutral meaning. As the verb that can be used in ‘NP1+被NP2 +VP’ construction became diverse, intransitive verbs appeared in ‘NP1+被NP2 +VP’ construction. And this also affected ‘NP1+被+VP’ construction, which led to appearance of ‘new bei construction’. Thus, we can say that ‘NP1+被NP2 +VP’ and ‘NP1+被+VP’and ‘new bei construction’ are structurally connected and they are interactive.
KCI연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
