RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재후보

        한국고고학의 연구방향

        최성락(Choi Sung-rak) 역사문화학회 2004 지방사와 지방문화 Vol.7 No.2

        In the last 60 years, Korean archaeology has largely developed externally. But the method and theory in Korean archaeology was not discussed to any extent internally. In this article, the following problems of the direction of studies in the Korean archaeology are discussed, Firstly, I considered the concept, the purpose, and the identity of archaeology. The concept and the purpose of archaeology have changed as the archaeology has developed. The first role of archaeology was to describe past cultures, but currently it is to explain them. And it was considered the purpose of Korean archaeology. One of the purpose of Korean archaeology is to reconstruct past culture through material remains which is same with general purpose. In addition to this, they are to study the origin and unique creation of Korean culture and to study the territory of Korea and the relationship with the foreign culture. Archaeology now does not belong to history or anthropology, but archaeology is archaeology itself. Secondly, some problems such as process of study, basic assumptions, and philosophical discussion are considered. One of the basic assumptions is that all types of human behaviors left material remains, others are the evolutional thinking as materials’ progress and the concept of uniformitarianism came from geology. The philosophical discussion in archaeology improved the level of explanation on the past culture, and reached almost same level with other disciplines. Lastly, I considered the direction of the studies in Korean archaeology on aspects of studies and reality. In aspects of studies, It was considered the establishment of the system in archaeological studies and the enlargement of subfield in archaeology. Specially understanding of archaeological studies and discussions about method and theory of archaeology are more needed. In aspects of reality, it was considered some subjects such as the role of institutions, conservation of sites, management of museums, and public archaeology. The cooperation between archaeological institutions and the participation to public activities should be needed. Until now, I think that Korean archaeology did not get out of the traditional archaeology. Therefore, It is more prudent ways to improve constantly the method and theory needed in Korean archaeology rather than to follow recklessly the trend of world archaeology.

      • KCI등재

        고고학 해석의 지평 넓히기 – ‘고고학 자료’에 대한 다양한 인식 검토 –

        고일홍 서울대학교 인문학연구원 2012 人文論叢 Vol.68 No.-

        The various approaches used to interpret the archaeological evidence are based on different perceptions of the archaeological record. This paper aims to examine the interpretative possibilities and limitations of culture-historical archaeology and the various approaches of processual (the New Archaeology, behavioral archaeology, and Darwinian evolutionary archaeology) and post-processual archaeology (contextual archaeology, phenomenological approaches to the landscape, and a ‘structuring’ archaeology) with focus on the way in which the archaeological record is perceived. In doing so, it is hoped that a better understanding of these approaches may be obtained, as well as the acknowledgement that, in the interpretation of a common data set, the dissimilar results produced by the various approaches should be regarded as being interpretations with different points of focus, rather than as being contrasting interpretations. It is suggested that this will help lay down the foundations for a more symbiotic relationship between the various archaeological approaches currently in use within Korean archaeology.

      • KCI등재

        고고학 해석의 지평 넓히기 -고고학 자료에 대한 다양한 인식 검토-

        고일홍 ( Il Hong Ko ) 서울대학교 인문학연구원 2012 人文論叢 Vol.68 No.-

        The various approaches used to interpret the archaeological evidence are based on different perceptions of the archaeological record. This paper aims to examine the interpretative possibilities and limitations of culture- historical archaeology and the various approaches of processual (the New Archaeology, behavioral archaeology, and Darwinian evolutionary archaeology) and post-processual archaeology (contextual archaeology, phenomenological approaches to the landscape, and a ``structuring`` archaeology) with focus on the way in which the archaeological record is perceived. In doing so, it is hoped that a better understanding of these approaches may be obtained, as well as the acknowledgement that, in the interpretation of a common data set, the dissimilar results produced by the various approaches should be regarded as being interpretations with different points of focus, rather than as being contrasting interpretations. It is suggested that this will help lay down the foundations for a more symbiotic relationship between the various archaeological approaches currently in use within Korean archaeology.

      • KCI등재

        고고학의 철학적 토대

        김종일 한국고고학회 2004 한국고고학보 Vol.52 No.-

        이 글에서는 고고학의 이론과 방법론의 형성에 많은 영향을 끼쳤거나 아니면 현재 끼치고 있는 철학적 경향들의 내용을 살펴보고 그 의의와 한계에 대해서 검토해보고자 하였다. 특히 포괄적 법칙모형과 가설 연역적 방식을 설명과 예측을 위한 방법론으로 채택한 과정고고학은 고고학의 기술(description)의 전제에 대한 검증을 요구함으로써 발굴과정의 체계화와 함께 고고학의 이론과 방법론의 발전에 중요한 기여를 하였지만 방법론 자체가 갖고 있는 논리적, 실체적 한계를 극복하지는 못하였다. 후기과정고고학은 맑시즘, 구조주의, 현상학, 그리고 해석학 등의 다양한 철학적 조류들을 물질문화의 관점에서 재검토하고 그 결과를 물질문화의 해석에 적용하고자 하였다. 비록 구체적이고 가시적인 성과는 아직 많이 나오고 있지는 않지만 적어도 고고학 내에서 다양한 철학적 조류들을 물질문화의 측면에서 재해석하는 작업은 끊임없이 계속될 것이고 또 계속되어야 한다고 생각된다. 그 이유로는 고고학 자체의 고유한 이론과 방법론의 수립이 고고학의 안에서뿐만 아니라 다른 인접학문의 연구 성과를 비판적으로 검토하는 과정에서 가능할 수 있기 때문이다. 이러한 과정을 통해 고고학은 선사시대를 포함하는 과거와 현재의 물질문화를 주 연구 대상으로 하는 하나의 독립된 학문으로 자리 매김을 할 수 있을 것으로 생각된다.

      • Image Dehazing using Conditional Context-aware Generative Adversarial Network

        Md Foysal Haque(포이살 하크),Hye-Youn Lim(임혜연),Dae-Seong Kang(강대성) 한국정보기술학회 2021 Proceedings of KIIT Conference Vol.2021 No.11

        기후 변화 인해 흐리고 흐린 날씨가 자주 일어나기 때문에 시야가 좁아진다. 최근 이미지 디헤이징을 위한 딥러닝 접근법의 개발에서, 이 작업은 컴퓨터 비전에서 좋지않은 성능으로 도전적인 문제로 여전히 간주된다. 본 논문에서 제안된 비지도 딥 러닝 모델인 이미지 디헤이징의 성능을 향상시킨다. 제안된 모델은 이미지 디헤이징 작업을 강화하기 위해 조건부 상황 인식 생성적 적대 네트워크를 통한 비지도 학습 방법을 채택했다. 이 모델은 희미해진 데이터와 원래의 희미하지 않은 훈련 데이터 사이의 상황 차이를 기반으로 희미함을 제거하는 방법을 학습한다. 또한 제안된 모델은 이미지의 사실적인 텍스처 정보를 생성하고 복잡한 흐릿한 이미지에 대한 시각적 대비를 향상시키기 위해 성공적인 정확도를 달성했다. Due to climate change, cloudy and hazy weather frequently occurs; therefore, this weather condition reduces visibility. In the recent development of deep learning approaches for image dehazing, the task remains considered an ill-posed and challenging problem in computer vision. Enhance the performance of image dehazing, an unsupervised deep learning model proposed in this paper. The proposed model adopted the unsupervised learning strategy with Conditional Context-aware Generative Adversarial Network to enhance the image dehazing task. The model learns to remove the haze based on the context difference between the dehazed and original haze-free training data. In addition, the proposed model achieved successive accuracy to generate realistic texture information of the image and enhance visual contrast for the complex hazy image.

      • KCI등재

        韓國考古學의 起源論과 系統論

        이성주 한국고고학회 2017 한국고고학보 Vol.102 No.-

        This paper presents a historical review on the studies of cultural and ethnical origins and transmissions that have taken place in Korean archaeology, and makes suggestions for future research directions in these fields. The discourse on ethnogenesis and cultural transmission can be understood in conjunction with the attempts made by Korean archaeologists to reconstruct national history after taking over the archaeological practices of the Japanese imperialists. Archaeological approaches to changes in prehistoric contexts have largely focused on the formal variations of artifacts and cultural assemblages, and interpretations of drastic socio-cultural transformations have relied on diffusionist assumptions or invasion hypotheses. Although some prehistoric changes can hardly be explained without assumptions of migration/diffusion, archaeological approaches concerning this topic should be underpinned by clear analyses of the processes and mechanisms of migration or diffusion.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼