http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 주제어 : post-liberal peace (검색결과 3 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
허지영 ( Heo¸ Ji Young ) 서울대학교 통일평화연구원 2021 통일과 평화 Vol.13 No.2
한반도의 평화논의는 남북한의 정치적인 통합에 치중하며 평화의 다양한 개념과 형태를 반영하지 못하는 한계가 있다. 본 연구는 통일중심 평화논의를 확장하고자 갈등사회를 살아가는 평범한 개인들이 일상에서 주체적으로 만들어가는 미시적 차원의 평화적인 행동양식과 사고방식에 주목하는 일상적 평화이론을 고찰한다. 국제기구나 서구국가가 중심이 되어 자유주의 체제를 분쟁지역에 일률적으로 이식하는 방식의 자유주의 평화구축에 대한 비평적 성찰을 바탕으로 등장한 개념이 포스트자유주의 평화 담론이다. 평화구축 과정에서 갈등지역의 고유한 역사, 정치, 사회적 맥락의 중요성과 주체적인 행위자로서 지역주민의 참여를 강조한다. 일상적 평화는 포스트자유주의 담론 중에서도 갈등사회의 가장 미시적인 차원에서 일상을 살아가는 개인들의 평화적인 행동과 사고방식, 그리고 미시적 차원의 평화활동이 거시적인 사회체제나 구조와 영향을 주고받는 평화의 구성성에 주목하는 개념이다. 본 연구는 일상적 평화의 정의와 특징을 맥긴티의 이론을 중심으로 소개하고 정치적이고 구조적인 차원에 치중하는 평화이론들과 차별화되는 일상적 평화의 의의와 한계 그리고 확장성에 대해 고찰한다. 일상적 평화이론은 통일이라는 거대 담론을 넘어 한반도의 평화논의를 다양화하는 데 기여할 수 있을 것이다. This study examines the concept of everyday peace, based on the critical perspective that varieties of peace have not been considered in the dominant unification discourse in South Korean society, which focuses on the political integration of the two Koreas. Everyday peace refers to the routinized pro-peace and pro-social practices by individuals and collectives living in deeply divided post-conflict societies. Everyday peace, one of post-liberal peace discourses which emerged as a critique of liberal peace, a dominant form of peace-support intervention, occurs in spaces or localities over which individuals and communities exercise limited control. Everyday peace is of significance in that it attempts to go beyond the dichotomies in peace and conflict studies of local vs. global or agent vs. structure. This article closely studies the theory of everyday peace focusing on Mac Ginty’s research, discussing its scalability as well as its limits. As a liberal-local hybrid form of peace, everyday peace can contribute to diversifying the peace and unification discourses in South Korea, in which peace is often regarded as political processes for unification.
-
진순애(Jin Soon-Ae) 한국비평문학회 2007 批評文學 Vol.- No.26
This paper shows a comparative study on the South and North-Korean war-poetry from the 1950s to the latest date and those peaceful politics. These war-poetry stand for the poetry just for the reunification of Korea peninsula after the Korean-war which let the Korea peninsula cut in halves. South Korea's war-poetry during the 1950s are characterized by two types which one is the poetry of post-communism and liberalism for the nationalism, and the other is the poetry of hometown image for the native place. Unusually North Korea's war-poetry during the 1950s are characterized by the hometown image getting loose from the socialist realism. South Korea's war-poetry during the 1960s are characterized by the post-imperialism for the nationalism, the poetry during the 1970s are characterized by the homeland image for the nationalism, and the poetry based on the Marxism during the 1980s are characterized by the ami-USA and capitalism. Usually the North Korea's war-poetry during the 1950s are characterized by the ami-USA for the communism, the poetry after the 1980s to the latest date are characterized by the homeland image for the nationalism, and the poetry of the latest date are characterized by the PyeongYang-tribalism for the communism which means North Korea's attempt to communize Korea peninsula. Especially, South and North Korea's war-poetry of the hometown and homeland image for the Korean original community have significance for the reunification of Korea peninsula cut in halves. Korean original community was expressed as a land not only rising above the modern, bur also a original peace land through the both of two Korean war-poetry.
-
Korea in the Post-Cold War World
James Strohmaier 21세기정치학회 2007 21세기 정치학회보 Vol.17 No.3
The anniversary of the end of the Cold War is coming soon, and scholars already are beginning an assessment of the major theoretical perspectives that have shaped post-Cold War international relations. The primary theoretical schools of Realism, Liberalism, and Constructivism have been well represented by the works of such authors as Mearsheimer, Fukuyama, and Huntington, respectively. This paper reviews the major post-Cold War macro-theoretical perspectives and then applies them to the micro-cases of Northeast Asia and the two Koreas. Often empirical evidence is used to buttress theory, but here, theories are applied to the security situation in Northeast Asia to draw inferences about the future of relations between the two Koreas, China, Japan, and the United States. The evidence used to support the potential findings is both anecdotal and impressionistic, but is a first step toward trying to understand what possible future scenarios are in store for relations among these countries. Suggestions for future research will be given.
KCI
KISS연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
