http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : Yongkil Jeong(정용길) (검색결과 7 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
Manzini"s (1992) Locality Revisited
Yongkil Jeong(정용길),Tai-Soo Kim(김태수) 한국생성문법학회 2007 생성문법연구 Vol.17 No.4
This paper critically reviews Manzini"s (1992) locality theory, which is an attempt to unify locality conditions for different types of dependency by introducing the notion of address. In order to extend her analysis of movement dependency to binding phenomena, Manzini (1992) assumes the so-called VP-internal subject hypothesis. In this paper, we will show that Manzini"s (1992) locality, which depends upon the notion of address, cannot be maintained if it sticks to the assumption of the VP-internal subject hypothesis. We will also show that V-T-I agreement is an alternative to the VP-internal subject hypothesis in Manzini"s (1992) unified locality theory.
-
On the Categorial Status of-Ko
Yongkil Jeong(정용길) 한국생성문법학회 2006 생성문법연구 Vol.16 No.3
This paper discusses the categorial status of verbal suffix -ko in Korean. Following Emonds" (1985) claim that COMPs can be analyzed as a subset of P, I propose that -ko, which is widely known as COMP in the literature, belongs to the category of P. I show that the verbal suffix -ko shares a variety of morphological and syntactic properties with the nominal suffix -eykey, which is of the category P: (ⅰ) -ko patterns with -eykey in that both are licensed in the passive, (ⅱ) -ko also behaves in the same manner as -eykey in terms of case drop, and (ⅲ) -ko share morphological properties with -eykey in terms of their interactions with various nominal suffixes such as topic marker and delimiters. Based upon these observations, this paper argues that -ko is of the category P.
-
정용길(Yongkil Jeong) 서울여자대학교 인문과학연구소 2012 인문논총 Vol.24 No.-
The purpose of this article is to show that universal features or concepts exist in the underlying level of individual languages even when they show apparent distinctions in the surface representation. We deal with grammatical features such as restrictive vs. non-restrictive relative clauses, surface vs. volume, state vs. event, factive vs. non-factive, and contrastive vs. non-contrastive, We argue that those features are universal and exist in the underlying representation and that they are overtly or covertly realized in different ways in the surface level. This article not only provides a piece of evidence for the notion of Universal Grammar suggested by Chomsky, but a new model of teaching English grammar.
-
정용길(Yongkil Jeong) 서울여자대학교 인문과학연구소 2008 인문논총 Vol.17 No.-
This article deals with the notion of countability for nouns in English. Given that nouns refer to entities in reality, it is not too much to say that grammatical properties of nouns stem from the properties of the entities referred to by those nouns. In this article, however, we will show that some properties of the real entities referred to by nouns are filtered out by what we may call 'psychological filters', and therefore do not map into the internal grammar of the speaker. In doing so, we will also show that in many cases grammatical features of nouns reflect how the speaker view the physical entities referred to by the nouns rather than the properties of the entities themselves.
-
Yongkil Jeong(정용길) 서울여자대학교 인문과학연구소 2009 인문논총 Vol.18 No.-
본 논문에서는 한국어와 영어세서 기능핵에 속하는 범주인 P의 탈락 현상이 Chomsky(1981)가 제안한 공법주원리에 의해서 설명될 수 있다는 것을 보여준다. 영어의 시간전치사들 중에서 for는 동사의 앞에 나타날 경우에는 탈락될 수 없는 반면에 동사의 뒤에 나타나는 경우에는 탈락될 수 있다. 영어의 전치사 for에 해당하는 한국어의 '동안'도 유사한 속성을 보여준다. 이러한 사실은 공법주는 반드시 적정지배되어야 한다는 공법주원리에 의해 설명된다. 이는 본래 Null C를 설명하기 위해 제시되었던 공범주원리가 그 외의 다른 기능핵들에도 적용될 수 있다는 것을 보여준다.
-
정용길 서울대학교 어학연구소 2000 語學硏究 Vol.36 No.1
Verbal suffix -nun, which follows the sentential endings -ta, -nya, -ca, and -la, has long been argued to be a complementizer licensed in CPs which are governed by N (Yoon 1990 and Jung 1992, among others). Lim (1995), however, suggests a possibility that the verbal suffix -nun is not a complementizer but a case marker. In this paper, I propose that the verbal suffix -nun categorially belongs to COMP and realizes genitive Case assigned to CP. Specifically, I argue that -nun is the genitive complementizer, compared to the genitive determiner -uy, under the assumption that Case may be realized as a nominal suffix when assigned to DPs and as a verbal suffixes when assigned to CPs. Under this analysis, the inflectional suffixes -uy and -nun share the feature [+Gen] and are distinguished in terms of their categorial features, that is, the former is [+N, -V] and the latter [-N, +V]. A convincing piece of evidence for the analysis of -nun as a genitive complementizer comes from the fact that -nun is licensed in exactly the same configuration as -uy. Both -nun and -uy are licensed only in the projections which are governed by N. The analysis of -nun as a genitive marker is also evidenced by the fact the -nun is interchangeable with -uy in interrogative clauses. Further, the fact that a genitive suffix '-ㅅ' historically developed into -nun also supports the analysis of -nun as the realization of genitives. Further research is required on the status of other inflectional suffixes which are licensed by N.
-
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
