RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • Making of the ‘Korean Question’:A Reassessment of India’s Position at the United Nations

        Jitendra Uttam 통일연구원 2020 International journal of korean unification studie Vol.29 No.2

        This paper argues that India’s seemingly demonstrated ‘great power capabilities,’ categorized here as ‘deviant state behavior,’ in fact led to a number of ‘binding constraints’ impacting its ability to positively influence the settlement of the ‘Korean Question’ at the United Nations. Theoretically, India’s approach to pursuing great power status was justified by the ‘dependency’ paradigm based on its premise of North- South cleavages, which effectively countered the dominant account produced by ‘structural realism’ and its concept of East-West bipolarity. By following Nehru’s ‘hybrid idealism,’ India was able to upgrade its stature as a leader of the ‘Third World’ with great power prestige. However, without possessing commensurable economic means, India created a stark foreign policy mismatch that compelled it to take a number of policy U-turns, like accepting UNTCOK’s botched-up zonal election bid, opposing UN forces crossing the 38th parallel and involving itself with the repatriation of POWs. Keywords: Great Powers, Bipolarity, United Nations, India, Korea

      • Indo-Pakistan Cross-border conflict and Problems of Communication

        Jitendra Uttam 한국국제정치학회 2010 한국국제정치학회 학술대회 발표논문집 Vol.2010 No.8

        This paper aims to demystify persistent communication bottlenecks emanating from the partition of Indian sub-continent and subsequent Indo-Pakistan cross-border conflict and derives an insight to resolve inter-Korean communication issues. In the past, various agreements and high level meetings such as Tashkent Agreement 1962, Indus River Water Treaty 1962, Simla Agreement 1972, establishment of Indo-Pakistan Joint Commission in 1982, Islamabad Summit 1988, Lahore Summit 1999, and Agra Summit 2001, have provided peacemeal success in the bilateral negotiation process; however in the recent times, deadlock seems to be the hallmark of inter-state communication leading to war-like skirmishes such as Kargil conflict (1999), missile as well as nuclear arms race, and Mumbai-like terrorist attacks originating from the Pakistani soil. We argue that success in resolving standoff in the Indo-Pak negotiations requires unfreezing of ‘cognitive rigidity’ that has negatively affected the dynamics of bilateral communication. The realignment in the cognitive schemes can possibly pave the way for a new mind set to emerge in the region that can be helpful in sorting-out nagging communication issues between the two arch-rivals. Literature that deals with the issue tends to focus on political, religious and to some extent economic calculus affecting bilateral communication; however it largely ignores the underlying cognitive rigidity that has drained attitudinal flexibility by freezing perspectives and mindsets. Theoretically, ‘cognitive scheme theory’ has been used to unravel the invisible dynamics of Indo-Pak negotiations. Empirically, the 2001 Agra Summit Meeting between Indian Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee and Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf has been analyzed to demonstrate how rigid cognitive schemes gave a final blow to negotiations that finally ended in utter failure. On the policy level, removing the persistent cognitive rigidities between two neighbors requires visionary leadership that can project sub-continents’ harmonious future over its tumultuous past by addressing issues related to antagonistic identity patterns deeply rooted in the age-old Hindu-Muslim religious discord resulting in the painful partition of the Indian sub-continent. The analysis points to the fact that the unfreezing of cognitive rigidities can provide clues to resolve some of inter Korean issues.

      • KCI등재

        Convergence of Finance, Technology and Entrepreneurship - The Role of Liberal Financial System in the Making of India’s New Economic Growth Regime (NEGR)

        Jitendra Uttam 서울대학교 국제학연구소 2005 Journal of International and Area Studies Vol.12 No.1

          This paper discusses how nation-states transform or re-design their economic growth regimes (EGRs). By acknowledging the fact that the structures of finance play an important role in the shaping of EGRs, this paper argues that the introduction of liberal financial system in India is acting as a catalyst in re-designing nation"s EGR. It analyzes Indian venture capital industry, an important component of liberal financial system, which is rather successful in mitigating interest conflict between principal/investor and agent/entrepreneur. The resolution of this interest conflict has expressed itself in greater convergence of interests between and among finance, technology and entrepreneurship, which lies at the core of still evolving new economic growth regime (NEGR) in India. This transformed EGR is instrumental in powering India"s technology-intensive service sector. Rapid growth in India"s knowledge economy, particularly information technology service industry, serves as an empirical evidence.

      • KCI등재

        Economics of Converging Theoretical Paradigms : Evidence from Indo-Korean Bilateral Economic Cooperation

        Jitendra Uttam 서울대학교 국제학연구소 2009 Journal of International and Area Studies Vol.16 No.2

        This paper examines economic consequences of converging theoretical paradigms affecting regimes of economic cooperation (RECs). In the past, theoretical paradigms such as capitalism vs. socialism or Keynesianism vs. monetarism clearly diverged on structural, organizational and operational levels, however in the recent times there are ample evidences showing greater theoretical convergence. Literature available on the issue primarily focuses on multilateral/bilateral free trade agreements and largely ignores the deeper theoretical realignments causing fundamental shift in the structure and reach of RECs. It argues that converging theoretical paradigms (CTPs) are affecting basic rationale and structure of cooperative arrangements. Theoretically, the second coming of liberal international economic order (LIEO) indicates that the CTPs have evolved around neo-liberal economic ideas. Empirically, a critical turn around in Indo-Korean RECs in the post-Cold War period-from market-seeking (1960s~1980s) to production-seeking (1990s~2000s), and cluster-seeking phase (2000~2007) - demonstrates the positive impact of CTPs.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼