http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : Jeffrey Robertson (검색결과 4 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
South Korea as a Middle Power: Capacity, Behavior, and Now Opportunity
Jeffrey Robertson 통일연구원 2007 International journal of korean unification studie Vol.16 No.1
South Korea in terms of physical, economic, and military capacity is often considered as a middle power. However, such a definition sits uneasily given South Korea’s past foreign policy behavior and its limited success in garnering coalition support for recent initiatives dealing with North Korean issues. Effectively, South Korea is representative of the dichotomy that exists between middle-power classifications based on foreign policy behavior and those based on measurements of capacity. Recognizing the constituent differences between emerging middle powers and traditional middle powers, and their ability to evolve from one into the other, allows for a better explanation of South Korea’s recent foreign policy behavior. South Korea has rapidly evolved into a traditional middle-power state. This is reflected in its aim to maintain the status quo and its tendencies towards compromise, coordination, and cooperation in foreign policy behavior. This paper determines how South Korea’s status as a traditional middle power affects its aims and methods on Korean peninsula issues, and how this will affect policies in the aftermath of the agreement reached at the Six-Party Talks in Beijing on February 13, 2007.
-
-
Middle Power Diplomacy and North Korea Revisited
Jeffrey Robertson 통일연구원 2022 International journal of korean unification studie Vol.31 No.1
The categorization of South Korea as a middle power has become normalized. A flood of academic papers, think-tank reports, workshops and seminars support the claim. Yet, despite widespread agreement that South Korea is a middle power, and a plethora of research supporting the claim, South Korea has never demonstrated characteristic middle power diplomatic behavior in addressing its most significant challenge - North Korea. This paper addresses the question of middle power diplomacy and North Korea. It first distinguishes the academic, political, and policy rationale in the use of the middle power concept before tracing its use in the context of North Korea. From middle power literature, the study extracts factors necessary for middle powers to secure diplomatic objectives before presenting an exemplary middle power diplomatic initiative. To conclude, the study explores potential reasons why South Korea has not demonstrated characteristic middle power diplomatic behavior in addressing North Korea.
-
Anti-Americanism in South Korea and the Future of the U.S. Presence
Jeffrey S. Robertson 서울대학교 국제학연구소 2002 Journal of International and Area Studies Vol.9 No.2
The United States has been intricately involved in the politics of South Korea since the end of the Second World War. Today, more than 37,000 United States troops remain stationed in South Korea. The United States presence has been a topic of contention on both sides of the Pacific in the past. Current international events coupled with political-social changes in South Korea have made the future of the Us. presence more critical.<BR> This paper presents an analysis of South Korean anti-Americanism. It traces the key current issues affecting anti-Americanism and looks at the sources of these issues. The paper then considers how anti-Americanism will be affected by generally accepted unification scenarios.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
