http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
Partisanship and Democratization
Doh Chull Shin 동아시아연구원 2007 Journal of East Asian Studies Vol.7 No.2
How do attachments to political parties among the mass publics of East Asia affect the process of democratization in the region? Analyses of the East Asia Barometer surveys reveal that partisanship motivates East Asians to endorse the democratic performance of their political system and embrace democracy as the best possible system of government. These findings accord, by and large, with the socialization, cognitive dissonance, and rational choice theories of partisanship.
( Doh Chull Shin ),( Chong Min Park ) 성균관대학교 동아시아학술원 2005 Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies Vol.5 No.2
In recent years, an increasing number of individual scholars and research institutions have made serious efforts to discern the distinct qualities of democracy and distinguish high-quality democracies from low-quality ones. Their research endeavors to date have all focused on the extent to which political regimes actually embody generic values of democracy. This study of Korean democracy offers and tests three sets of new ideas for a more systematic assessment of the quality of democracy from the perspective of ordinary citizens. The first set of these ideas focuses on the general quality of a regime`s performance as a democracy. The second set of ideas deals with how well a regime performs as an electoral democracy. The third, final set of ideas focuses on the question of how well a democratic regime performs as a liberal democracy. We have tested these three sets of new ideas with the first wave of the East Asia Barometer survey conducted in Korea during the month of February 2003.
The Deconsolidation of Liberal Democracy in Korea : Exploring its Cultural Roots
Doh Chull Shin 한국학술연구원 2018 Korea Observer Vol.49 No.1
Why did liberal democracy backslide in Korea, a highly globalized and well-developed country, contrary to what is expected from neo-modernization and other prominent theories of democratization in the West? To explore this question, I propose a cultural theory of democratic deconsolidation, and test it with the Asian Barometer Korean surveys conducted over the period 2011-15. The analysis of these surveys indicates that socioeconomic development under the sponsorship of the state and big businesses has failed to emancipate both ordinary citizens and political leaders from the Confucian legacies of political paternalism and social harmony. Moreover, it has failed to instill them with the bourgeois impulse to become a free and equal being. As the habits of their hearts and minds, these legacies powerfully motivate both groups to reembrace or condone the resurgence of autocratic political practices. Empirically, therefore, the deconsolidation of liberal democracy in this highly modernized country and the prevalence of affinity for paternalistic autocracy among its people directly challenge the Western theories that link socioeconomic modernization to human emancipation and liberal democratization.
신도철(Doh Chull Shin),최명(Myung Chey) 한국정치학회 1993 한국정치학회보 Vol.27 No.1
본 논문은 한국의 국민들이 권위주의적인 통치의 대안으로써 민주주의를 어떻게 인식하는지를 살펴보고자 하는 것이 목적이다. 이를 위해서 3가지 뚜렷한 차원을 포함하는 민주적 정당성의 모형을 제시하였다. 민주적 정당성에 대한 세차원의 모형은 서울대학교 사회과학연구소가 1991년 11월에 행한 전국적인 설문조사를 통해 분석되었다. 설문조사에 대한 다변량분석에 따르면, 민주적 정당성의 세가지 차원들은 다른 요인에 의해 상이하게 형성되는 것으로 나타났다. 예를 들어 상징적 차원은 인지적 동원에 의해 촉진되었던 반면에 도구적 차원과 역사적 차원은 오히려 장애가 되었거나 영향을 받지 않았다. 이러한 발견들에 따르면, 인지적 동원이 충분히 작용하고 있는 한국과 같은 신흥공업국에서는 민주화로의 도정이 매우 불안정하고, 동요되기 쉬우며, 험난할 것으로 보인다.
Divergent Paths of Democratization in Asia and Former Communist Europe
이준한,Doh Chull Shin 한국학술연구원 2003 Korea Observer Vol.34 No.1
This paper is a first systematic effort to compare post-authoritarian Asia and post-Communist Europe in terms of four important aspects of democratization. Specifically, it first compares the modes of democratic transition in the two regions. It then focuses on the institutional dimension of democratization. A comparative analysis of substantive democratic progress or retrogression follows, before a final depiction of regional differences in the general levels and patterns of popular support for democracy. It is argued that the modes of democratic transitions do not vary across the two regions, whereas there are remarkable differences in institutional choices, democratic progress, and attitudinal orientation toward democracy. We conclude that regional difference in democratization is more likely to emerge in the phase of consolidation than transition. The legacies of Communist rule abetted destruction of familiar governmental structure designed to maintain one-party dictatorship. Those legacies, however, impeded the growth of democratic legitimacy and maintenance of a free state more than authoritarian legacies of the East.