입법평가와 입법심사의 관계 고찰

황해봉(Hwang, Hae-Bong) 숭실대학교 법학연구소 2013 法學論叢 Vol.29 No.-

입법평가제도는 입법 활동을 계획하여 법령의 증가를 억제하고 입법과정에서 나타나는 경솔을 제거하며, 정기적으로 기존의 법령을 검토하여 과학적인 입법의 발전을 도모한다. 이러한 입법평가와 기존의 유사제도를 비교를 통해 입법평가의 의미를 파악할 수 있다. 종전에는 입법평가를 규제영향분석, 법안비용추계, 성별영향평가 및 부패영향평가와 비교를 통해서 그 제도의 필요성을 역설했다. 그러나 입법평가와 입법심사와의 비교는 활발히 논의 되지 않았다. 두 제도의 관계를 목표, 평가(또는 심사)기준, 도구수단, 그리고 사전입법평가와 법령입안심사, 법적영향평가와 입법심사, 사후평가제도와 법령정비의 관점에서 비교하여 두 제도의 동질성과 차이점을 분석하였다. 이외에 입법평가제도의 도입 타당성과 관련하여 입법평가와 입법심사의 관계를 검토하였다. 결론적으로 현재 우리가 행하고 있는 입법심사와 유사제도를 최대한 존중하면서 입법심사의 보완적 수단으로서 입법평가의 활용이 가능하다는 것이다. The legislative evaluation system is to limit the increasing number of statutes and prevent a hasty decision in the legislative process and promote the development of scientific legislation of by reviewing existent laws statutes and regulations. Through comparing the legislative evaluation and similar existing systems, the meaning of the legislative evaluation could be understood. The necessity of the legislative evaluation system has been emphasized by shedding light on the relation between the legislative evaluation and the regulatory impact analysis, the bill cost estimate, the gender impact assessment and the corruption impact assessment etc. However, the comparison of the legislative examination and the legislative evaluation has not been done. We can understand the relationship between the legislative evaluation of 3 phases and the legislative examination form the aspects of goals, assessment(examination) standards and instruments. Further, comparing the pre-impact assessment and examination on legislative bills, legal impact assessment and legislative examination, post-assessment system and statute improvement project, the similarities and differences of the two institutions could be analyzed. In addition, regarding the propriety of the introduction of evaluation system, the relationship between the legislative evaluation and the legislative examination can be explored. In conclusion, we can make efficient use of the legislative evaluation as complementary means of the legislative examination, while respecting the existing legislative examination system and similar institutions.

재건축초과이익 환수제도의 법적 검토

황해봉 ( Hae Bong Hwang ) 건국대학교 법학연구소 2011 一鑑法學 Vol.0 No.20

The restitution of exceed gains from reconstruction was introduced to prevent the privatization of exceed gains or unearned income and ultimately to stabilize housing prices. However, there would be room for unconstitutionality when we consider restriction of property rights, difficulties of a fair and accurate measurement of property liable for taxation, lack of appropriate regulations in case of land price declines, double taxation, retroactive legislation, violation of the principle of equality, violation of the principle of excessive prohibition. This system was created in the era of real estate boom and there was no social consensus during the process of creating the system. This system, compared to another restitution system of development gains, restricts property rights quite excessively. Moreover, there were not enough legislative considerations of subjects who have property rights and freedom of the reconstruction. Considering shrinking real estate market of nowadays and the restitution of exceed gains from the reconstruction of apartments, we can see that the reconstruction of apartments is getting more and more difficult. However in the future the reconstruction of apartments should not have to be suppressed, but rather to be supported, especially considering that apartments in the 1st New City and other neighboring area are presently more than 20 years old and their building coverage and floor area ratio are very high. So we will have to consider introducing policies to encourage the reconstruction of apartments. Through the analysis of the status and problems of restitution development gains including the restitution of exceed gains from the reconstruction of apartments, we will be able to discuss ways to improve the system. First, we must formulate national consensus that land or housing benefit or unearned income generated from any developments or redevelopments should be restituted, complying with the principle of social state and the public concept of land. Second, we need to restitute exceed gains originated from all development projects without exception and modify our legal system necessary for restitution of exceed gains from all development projects not only for the development areas but also for the neighborhood of the development areas.

기업도시, 혁신도시 및 행정중심복합도시 법제에 대한 토지공법적 검토

황해봉(Hwang Hae Bong) 한국토지공법학회 2007 土地公法硏究 Vol.37 No.2

  This paper explores and compares by whom and through what procedure the Enterprise City, the Innovation City and the Multifunctional Administration City are developed, how their developments are to be financed, how expropriation and compensation of land is to be undertaken, and also issues specifically pertaining to each city from the perspective of public land law.<BR>  Special provisions to facilitate and speed up development are deemed unavoidable in view of the urgent need to alleviate overpopulation of the metropolitan area and to achieve balance between different regions. Nevertheless, the development plans of each city should be in harmony with overall national territorial plans, and also the autonomy of local governments and the local community in matters of economical and industrial development should be respected and protected. From this viewpoint, the laws which constitute the groundwork for the Enterprise City, the Innovation City and the Multifunctional Administration City can be seen as sacrificing the autonomy of local governments and participation of local residents for the sake of a speedy achievement of balanced regional development initiated, propelled and led by the central government.

독일의 계획확정절차와 수용가능성

황해봉(Hwang, Hae-Bong) 한국토지공법학회 2015 土地公法硏究 Vol.68 No.-

Die vorliegende Abhandlung überprüft und versucht to beantworten, die rechtspolitische Frage, ob es sowohl rechswirksam als auch empfehlenswert ist, das deutsches Planfeststellungsverfahren ins koreanische Verwaltungsverfahrensgesetz aufzunehmen. Die Frage verbleibt hierzulande im koreanischen Verwaltungsrecht. Wir koennen verschiedene Aspekte überprüfen. Das heisst die Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung, die Objekts, die Rechtsentwicklungen und die Aufnahmeweise des Planfeststellungsverfahrens. Wir kommen zu folgendem Ergebnis: nach koreaniche Gesetze und Realitaet hat seine Akzeptabilitaet viel Schwierigkeit. 행정절차에 관한 일반법인 행정절차법에 행정계획에 대한 규정이 결여되어 있는 상황에서 독일의 연방행정절차법상 계획확정절차를 우리나라에서 수용하자는 의견에 대해 갑론을박이 있다. 이에 계획확정절차는 무엇인지를 먼저 살펴보고, 그 다음으로 공공참여와 숙의제도, 계획확정 대상의 범위, 계획확정결정의 집중효 및 계획확정절차의 수용방안 등 네 가지 측면에서 계획확정절차의 수용가능성에 대한 물음을 제기하고 그 해답을 모색해 보려고 한다.

준산업단지 지정권자의 재량권과 그 한계

황해봉(Hwang, Hae-Bong) 한국토지공법학회 2012 土地公法硏究 Vol.59 No.-

준산업단지 지정을 함에 있어서 구체적 개별적인 요건인 지구지정 지표(적법성, 생태적 적합성, 산업특성 및 밀접도등), 준산업단지 정비계획, 산업단지개발지침 등을 분석함으로써 지정의 법적 성격과 지정권자의 재량권의 범위 및 한계를 검토하였다. 민간요청에 의한 지방자치단체의 준산업단지 지정은 준산업단지 정비계획이 수반되는 물적 일반처분으로 일정한 재량ㆍ형성적 자유가 인정되나, 산업입지의 개발을 촉진 유도하는 것이 산입입지 및 개발에 관한 법률 의 목적임을 볼 때 당해 법령과 관계 법령, 입지지침 등에 규정한 지정기준에 위배되지 않는 한 지정하여야 된다고 본다. 한편, 기존 공장이 밀집된 지역에서의 정비가 필수적인 곳을 우선하여 지방자치단체가 그러한 지역을 지정하는 계획과 지원계획을 세우도록 입법적 차원에서 검토할 필요가 있다. 또한 아파트 등의 재개발 재건축과 같이 준산업단지 자체에 대한 세부적인 정비계획기준 및 절차 등을 입법적으로 보완하여 산업단지 규정의 준용으로 인한 해석의 불분명 등을 해소할 필요가 있다. In designation of semi-industrial complex are examined the legal nature of designation and the scope and limitations of the discretion, by analyzing specific individual requirements of designation, the improvement plan of semi-industrial complex, development instructions of industrial complex. The designation of semi-industrial complex by private request which is accompanied by the improvement plan of semi-industrial complex, is a material general disposal. Accordingly local autonomous entities have a lot of discretion, in disposing it. But considering the purpose of the law on locations suitable for industrial use and its development which promote and induce the development of locations suitable for industrial use, they have to designate semi-industrial complex, so long as such designations aren’t against related laws and regulations, locations guidelines, etc. On the other hand, we need to review the legislative level to plan and support designations of semi-industrial complex which are essential to improve existing plants in dense regions by local autonomous entities. And such as reconstruction and redevelopment of apartments etc., we need to review the legislative level to have detailed and specific standards and procedures on the improvement plan in semi-industrial complex. With it the uncleanness of legal interpretation due to applying the provisions of industrial complexes can be solved.