http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
KoMCI(Korean Medical Citation Index)와 KCI(Korea Citation Index)의 2004년도 영향력지표값 비교분석
허선,이춘실,Sun, Huh,Lee, Choon-Shil 한국과학기술정보연구원 과학기술정보센터 2005 Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice Vol.36 No.3
대한의학회에서 발행하는 우리나라 의학학술지의 영향력지표인 KoMCI(Korean Medical Citation Index) 2004의 결과값과 한국학술진흥재단에서 산출한 우리나라 학술지의 영향력지표인 2004년도 KCI(Korea Citation Index)에 공통으로 포함된 의학학술지의 영향력지표(impact factor, IF), 자체인용제외 영향력지표(ZIF), 자체인용 영향력지표(SIF) 값을 비교하고, 왜 이 두 가지 지표 값 사이에 차이가 나는 지에 대하여 고찰하였다. KoMCI와 KCI에 공통으로 등재된 의학학술지 중 양쪽에 모두 2004년도 영향력지표 값이 있는 경우는 59종이었다. KoMCI IF 평균과 KCI IF 평균은 유의한 차이가 있었으며 KCI 값은 KoMCI의 18%이었다. KoMCI ZIF 평균과 KCI ZIF 평균은 0.01로 유의한 차이가 있었으며, KCI 값은 KoMCI 값의 23.5%이었다. 자체 인용에 영향력지표는 KoMCI SIF 평균이 0.13, KCI 평균이 0.02로 유의한 차이가 있었다(p=0.0000). 이러한 차이는 KCI의 인용문헌 데이터베이스를 전거통제(authority control)하지 않고, 학술지 논문에 저자가 기술한 상태 그대로 데이터 베이스에 입력하기 때문으로 추정된다. 앞으로 한국학술진흥재단이 이 KCI를 학술지평가에 사용하고자 한다면, 데이터베이스의 유일성을 확보하는 전거통제를 반드시 시행하여 정확하고 신뢰할 수 있는 영향지표를 산출하여야 한다. Korean Academy of Medical Sciences began developing Korean Medical Citaton Index(KoMCI) database in 2002, and has announced the impact factors of Korean medical journals published since 2000. In July 2005, Korea Research Foundation also announced the KCI impact factor of journals covering all subject areas for the 2003 and 2004. We compared the impact factor(IF), impact factor excluding self-citation(ZIF), and self-citation impact factor(SIF) of KoMCI 2004 and KCI 2004 in order to disclose why there is such a great difference in the values of impact factors between two databases. Out of 72 medical journals in both database, 59 journals were compared after excluding the missing data in KCI. Mean IF of KoMCI 2004 was 0.2 and that of KCI 2004 was 0.03(p=0.0000). Mean ZIF of KoMCI was 0.06 and that of KCI was 0.01(p=0.000). Mean SIF of KoMCI was 0.139 and that of KCI was 0.02(p=0.0000). We presumed that the major difference in the impact factor values was originated from the fact that KCI does not control the authority of journal names cited in the references. We strongly recommend that it is necessary to control the authority especially if Korea Research Foundation wants to ensure the validity and reliability of KCI data in the evaluation of korean journals.
의학교육에서 컴퓨터바탕검사와 문항은행 데이터베이스 구축
허선,Huh, Sun 연세대학교 의과대학 2014 의학교육논단 Vol.16 No.1
A number of medical schools in Korea have been using computer-based testing (CBT) for evaluating their students' scientific and/or clinical performance since the early 1990s. Introducing CBT to medical education would have several advantages: first, presenting figures and audio-video files of clinical content is simple with CBT, making it possible to evaluate medical students' competency with navigating more realistic clinical situations at minimum cost; second, CBT enables automatic item analysis and score reporting. To establish CBT, constructing an item bank with item parameters such as difficulty or discriminating parameters will be needed. To select more psychometrically sound items, analysis of the items according to item response theory is necessary. CBT has already been introduced in high stakes tests like the United States Medical Licensing Examination and the Medical Council of Canada Qualifying Examination. The National Health Personnel Examination Board in Korea is also planning to introduce a CBT-based version of the National Medical Examination soon. Thus all medical schools in Korea will need to introduce CBT and construct item banks to prepare their students for their licensing examinations and to measure the students' competency more accurately.