http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
유행인가? 실행(Praxis)인가? - 가족연구에서의 다문화가족 담론분석과 성찰 -
최연실,Choi, Youn-Shil 한국가정관리학회 2009 가정과삶의질연구 Vol.27 No.6
The purpose of this study is to identify and illustrate academic trends that can be gleaned from family studies on multicultural families in Korea, and to gain a suggestion of the relatedness between discourse and practice by reviewing research in that field. The results of discourse analysis are as follows: First, research on multicultural families in family studies set limited focal subjects. Second, the research accepts assimilationism as a primary multicultural policy set forward by the Korean Government. Third, the research reflects a more or less conservative consciousness of family maintenance. Fourth, there have been some changes in perspectives from the perception of immigrant women in multicultural families as passive minorities to more active agents. Lastly, the research perceives family life in multicultural families as a project for practice.
최연실 ( Youn Shil Choi ),조은숙 ( Eun Suk Cho ),남영주 ( Nam Young Ju ),송명숙 ( Myung Sook Song ),권희경 ( Hee Kyung Kwon ) 한국가족관계학회 2012 한국가족관계학회지 Vol.16 No.4
The purpose of this study was to examine how Certified Healthy Family Specialists (CHFS) have made their family images, what the contents of their family images were and whether these family images were reflected in their practices of service or not in the perspectives of social constructionism and discourse theory. For this purpose, primarily, in-depth interviews with 9 CHFS were conducted, and secondly, focus group interview with 5 CHFS were performed in this study. The results of this study were as follows: First, personal experiences, education and training, and work experiences have been affected as backgrounds in making family images among CHFS. Second, CHFS`s family images reflected more profound insight comparing to those of laymen. Third, CHFS`s family images were reflected in their practices of service. This study tried to have an opportunity to reflect critical endeavors in academic and practical fields related to Healthy Family Support Centers and CHFS up to now and to explore desirable references of intervention.
한국 무자녀 부부의 초상 1 : 무자녀 유형에 따른 심리적 복지, 부부관계 및 자녀에 대한 태도
최연실(Choi, Younshil),성미애(Sung, Miai),이재림(Lee, Jaerim) 한국가족학회 2014 가족과 문화 Vol.26 No.1
본 연구의 목적은 무자녀 유형(자발형, 비자발형, 연기형)에 따라 심리적 복지(주관적 행복도, 생활만족도, 자존감, 우울), 부부관계(부부관계 만족도, 부부적응, 별거 혹은 이혼 가능성, 부부 여가시간), 자녀에 대한 태도(본인이 자녀를 원하는 정도, 배우자가 자녀를 원하는 정도, 입양의향, 자녀에 대한 생각, 이상적 자녀수)에서 차이가 있는지를 규명하는 것이다. 이를 위해, 결혼한 지 3년이 경과하였고 자녀가 없으며 서울 및 수도권에 거주하고 있는 50세 미만의 남녀를 대상으로 질문지 조사를 실시하였고, 총 544명의 자료를 분석하였다. 자료를 분석하기 위해 기술통계 분석, 일원분산분석 및 Tukey 사후검증, 카이제곱(Χ²) 검증을 실시하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 무자녀 기혼자는 대체로 심리적 복지 수준이 양호하였고, 전반적으로 부부관계가 원만한 편이었으며, 자녀에 대해 긍정적인 태도를 취하는 편이었다. 둘째, 무자녀 유형별로 결혼지속연수, 주관적 건강, 부부소득 적정성, 배우자소득, 종교의 중요도, 맞벌이 여부, 자가 소유 여부 등의 사회인구학적 특성에서 차이를 보였다. 셋째, 무자녀 유형별로 심리적 복지, 즉 주관적 행복도, 생활만족도, 자존감, 우울은 모두 차이가 있었다. 넷째, 무자녀 유형별로 부부관계 만족도, 부부적응, 별거/이혼 가능성 예측에서 차이를 보였다. 다섯째, 무자녀 유형별로 본인과 배우자가 각각 자녀를 원하는 정도, 입양 의향, 자녀에 대한 생각, 이상적 자녀수에서 모두 차이가 있었다. 이러한 결과를 통해 볼 때, 무자녀 유형별로 개인적 차원, 관계적 차원, 세대적 차원에서 차이가 있다는 것을 알 수 있었다. 따라서, 추후 연구에서도 이러한 유형별 분석이 무자녀 기혼자의 면모를 파악해 가는 데 있어 유용한 접근방식임을 확인할 수 있었다. 또한 이를 바탕으로, 정책적 차원에서 무자녀 기혼자에게 접근해갈 때도 그러한 각 유형집단별 내부적 속성의 차이를 중심으로 실천적 개입을 전개할 필요성이 제기된다. The purpose of this study was to examine whether psychological well-being, couple relationships, and attitudes toward children differed among the three categories of childless married Koreans. The three categories were voluntary, involuntary, and postponing childless groups. In this study, psychological well-being included subjective happiness, life satisfaction, self-esteem, and depression; couple relationships included marital satisfaction, dyadic adjustment, perceived likelihood of separation or divorce, and the couple's leisure time; and attitudes toward children included one's aspirations for having a child, the spouse's aspirations for having a child, intention to adopt, attitudes toward parenthood, and the ideal number of children. Data came from 544 childless Koreans who had been married for at least three years, aged 49 years or younger, and lived in metropolitan Seoul. We used descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVA, and chi-squared tests to examine the differences among the voluntary, involuntary, and postponing groups. Overall, childless married Koreans reported modestly higher levels of psychological well-being, couple relationships, and attitudes toward children. Some of their socio-demographic characteristics (i.e., years of marriage, subjective health, perceived income sufficiency, spouse's income, religiosity, having dual incomes, homeownership) differed among the three childless groups. For psychological well-being, we found significant differences in the levels of subjective happiness, life satisfaction, self-esteem, and depression among the three groups. For couple relationships, significant differences were found among the three groups in marital satisfaction, dyadic adjustment, and perceived likelihood of separation or divorce. Finally, for attitudes toward children, we also found significant differences in the levels of one's aspirations for having a child, the spouse's aspirations for having a child, intention to adopt, attitudes toward parenthood, and the ideal number of children among the three childless groups. In conclusion, voluntary, involuntary, and postponing childless groups differed in individual, relational, and generational aspects. These findings imply that understanding childless Koreans using the three categories would be a useful approach in future research. We also suggest that policymakers and practitioners need to consider the heterogeneity of the three childless groups in developing public policies and providing services with regards to fertility and childlessness.
한국가족의 변화에 대한 일고찰: 변화 양상, 맥락 및 쟁점을 중심으로
최연실 ( Youn Shil Choi ) 한국가족관계학회 2013 한국가족관계학회지 Vol.17 No.4
The purpose of this study is to explore changes and multifaceted figures of the Korean family by macro-level and empirical materials. For this purpose, the results of Statistics provided by National Statistical Office and 2005/2010 the Korean Family Survey conducted by Ministry of Gender Equality and Family were used in this study. Nextly, based on these results, an experimental analytic framework was proposed to tap various contexts and primary factors of family change. Lastly, some social issues which are related to current phenomena in the Korean family were discussed.