http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
Aveva Marine과 SmartMarine 3D간의 해양 플랜트 3D 배관 CAD 모델의 배치모드 기반 비교 시스템 개발
이재선(Jaesun Lee),김병철(Byung Chul Kim),천상욱(Sanguk Cheon),조민철(Mincheol Cho),이광(Gwang Lee),문두환(Duhwan Mun) (사)한국CDE학회 2016 한국CDE학회 논문집 Vol.21 No.1
When a plant owner requests plant 3D CAD models in the format that a shipbuilding company does not use, the shipyard manually re-models plant 3D CAD models according to the owner’s requirement. Therefore, it is important to develop a technology to compare the re-modeled plant 3D CAD models with original ones and to quantitatively evaluate similarity between two models. In the previous study, we developed a graphic user interface (GUI)-based comparison system where a user evaluates similarity between original and re-modeled plant 3D CAD models for piping design at the level of unit. However, an offshore plant consists of thousands of units and thus a system which compares several plant 3D CAD models at unit-level without human intervention is necessary. For this, we developed a new batch model comparison system which automatically evaluates similarity of several unit-level plant 3D CAD models using an extensible markup language (XML) file storing file location and name data about a set of plant 3D CAD models. This paper suggests system configuration of a batch-mode-based comparison system and discusses its core functions. For the verification of the developed system, comparison experiments for offshore plant 3D piping CAD models using the system were performed. From the experiments, we confirmed that similarities for several plant 3D CAD models at unit-level were evaluated without human intervention.
Aveva Marine과 SmartMarine 3D 간의 해양 플랜트 3D 배관 CAD 모델 유사도 평가 시스템 개발
이재선(Jaesun Lee),김병철(Byung Chul Kim),김형기(Hyungki Kim),천상욱(Sanguk Cheon),조민철(Mincheol Cho),이광(Gwang Lee),김진현(Jin-Hyun Kim),문두환(Duhwan Mun),한순흥(Soonhung Han) 대한기계학회 2016 大韓機械學會論文集A Vol.40 No.4
해양 플랜트의 설계·건조·운전 과정에 참여하는 다수의 이해관계자들은 일반적으로 서로 다른 플랜트 3D CAD 시스템을 사용한다. 그리고 플랜트 설계 및 건조 업체는 플랜트 주문주에게 설계 결과물로 계약서에 명시된 형식의 플랜트 3D CAD 모델을 납품해야 한다. 그러나 플랜트 3D CAD 시스템에서 제공되는 데이터 교환 기능의 제약으로 인해서 플랜트 설계 및 건조 업체는 많은 경우 계약서에 명시된 형식에 맞게 해양 플랜트 3D 모델을 수작업으로 다시 모델링을 하여 납품한다. 따라서 수작업으로 리모델링된 3D CAD 모델의 정확도를 검증하기 위해 원본 플랜트 3D CAD 모델과 재모델링된 플랜트 3D CAD 모델간의 비교를 해야 한다. 이를 위해 해양 3D CAD 모델의 유사도를 정략적으로 평가하는 시스템을 개발하였다. 이 논문에서는 시스템의 구조 및 세부 기능을 설명한다. 그리고 비교 시스템을 이용한 실험 결과에 대해서 설명한다. Diverse stakeholders engaged in design, construction, and operation and maintenance of offshore plants typically operate heterogeneous plant 3D CAD systems. Engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) companies are required to submit plant design result to the owner in the form of a plant 3D CAD model, as specified in the contract. However, because of the limitations of data interface of plant 3D CAD systems, EPC companies frequently perform manual remodeling to fulfill the terms and conditions of the contract. Therefore, comparison should be performed between the source plant 3D CAD model and the remodeled plant 3D CAD model to prove the validity of the remodeled plant 3D CAD model. To automate the comparison process, we have developed a system for quantitatively assessing the similarity of the plant 3D CAD models. This paper presents the architecture and detailed functions of the system. In addition, experimental results using this system are explained.
Aveva Marine 과 SmartMarine 3D 간의 해양 플랜트 3D 배관 CAD 모델 유사도 평가 시스템
이재선(Jaesun Lee),김병철(Byung Chul Kim),김형기(Hyungki Kim),천상욱(Sanguk Cheon),조민철(Mincheol Cho),이광(Gwang Lee),문두환(Duhwan Mun),한순흥(Soonhung Han) (사)한국CDE학회 2015 한국 CAD/CAM 학회 학술발표회 논문집 Vol.2015 No.하계
Diverse stakeholders engaging in design, construction, and operation and maintenance of offshore plant typically operate heterogeneous plant 3D CAD systems. Engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) companies should deliver plant design result to an owner in the form of plant 3D CAD model specified in the contract. However, due to the limitation of data interface of plant 3D CAD systems, EPC companies frequently perform manual remodeling to fulfill the terms and conditions of contract. Therefore comparison should be performed between source plant 3D CAD model and remodeled plant 3D CAD model in order to prove the validity of remodeled plant 3D CAD model. In order to automate the comparison process, we developed a system for quantitatively assessing the similarity of plant 3D CAD models. In addition, experiment results using the comparison system are explained.