http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
이은미(李銀美),정용준(鄭溶俊),??怡 (번역자) 한국방송학회 2005 한국방송학회 세미나 및 보고서 Vol.- No.-
Traditionally, broadcasting market is considered as an object of protection rather than liberalization, because of national identity and security. Since the 1990's, however, the liberalization of broadcasting market in Asian countries has gradually appeared. China, being WTO treaty members, coped with the transition of the CCTV and People's Daily into multi-media complex group and restrictive liberalization through cableTV rather than satellite broadcasting. Contrary to the cases of China, South Korea, which had stuck to the protection strategy of broadcasting market, recently changed it into radical liberalization one. The foreign investment in cable TVs and broadcasting channels has enlarged into 49% from 33%, considering the enlargement of the broadcasting platform transmission capacity of foreign broadcasting channels such as CCTV, NHK and CNN. South Korea requested those negotiation states, especially Mainland China, to open their broadcasting at the same level. Despite of the recent enlargement of foreign investment, South Korea does not obtain much in return. In contrast with the retransmission of CCTV in South Korea, Mainland China does not permit South Korea's broadcasting. On the basis of this liberalization policy, broadcasting exchange among South Korea, China can be more active, which helps the improvement of relations among those countries. In order to do this, it is thought that China's restrictive liberalization broadcasting policy should be modified.