http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
사회적경제기본법 제정 표류 이유: 행위자 네트워크 이론으로 분석
염찬희 연세대학교(미래캠퍼스) 빈곤문제국제개발연구원 2021 地域發展硏究 Vol.30 No.3
The Framework Act on Social Economy was proposed by the ruling lawmakers with the opposition party in 2014, Korea. At that time, it was expected the Framework Act on Social Economy would be legislated. However the 19th National Assembly failed to enact the Act. It has been drifting since the 20th Assembly. This study sought to figure out the reason of the 7 years long drift of the Act. This article would argue that the Framework was black-boxed as ‘anti-market’, ‘anti-capitalistic’ ‘leftist’ bill. Therefore this paper aims to reveal how the act had been black-boxed as ‘an anti-capitalistic bill’. Various human and non-human actors who involved with the preparation of the Framework during 2013-2016 was studied by Actor-Network Theory. Various non-human actors, such as article 10(2) of the Framework Act of Co-operatives, successive defeats in the 2010, 2011 election, some social economy support policies by the Mayor of Seoul (W.Park), etc., had grabbed the attention of the ruling Saenuri Party. S. Yoo MP from the Saenuri tried to enter into a social economy actor-networks which had been constructed by the opposition Party, and some liberal activist groups, the Co-operatives Act, etc. He became a major actor in networking for the Framework Act. However the conservative force, such as the conservative press and research companies, Ministry of Economy and Finance, and President Park, played a role of obstructive actors, by stigmatizing Yoo MP as a socialist. President Park kicked him out the Party on grounds of political opinions. Yoo’s network was cut off from the Framework network. Finally the Framework Act on Social Economy was black-boxed as ‘anti-market’, ‘anti-capitalistic’ ‘leftist’ bill.
한국생협의 정체성에 대한 연구: 홈페이지 담론 분석을 통해
염찬희 농협대학교 협동조합경영연구소 2022 협동조합경영연구 Vol.56 No.-
This article seeks to figure out identities of consumers’ co-ops by analyzing their websites. In other words, this study aimed to explain how Korean consumers’ co-ops represent their identities on their website homepages. The homepage of an organization is a suitable text for uncovering it’s identity is proved by some preceding researches. Dure Coop, iCOOP, Hansalim, Happycoop are objects of this study. The iCOOP and Hansalim have been selected for analysis. Multimodal texts on the homepage and the ‘About Us’ page from October to December 2021 are examined, by using critical discourse analysis and Kress & van Leeuwen’s concepts of visual grammar. Results of this research show differences in the form and content of representation of the identity of consumers’ co-ops, the words used to describe members and goods, the manners of naming the related body, and more. Compared to the others, Hansalim has a unique, farmer-oriented paradigm. The iCOOP is different from other co-ops, because it places a premium on “I” and “the individual.” Despite a varieties of identities, consumers’ co-ops have similar social values; to build a harmonious society rather than a “winnertake-all” society and to devote themselves to save the earth against climate change. 이 연구는 한국생협의 웹사이트에서 재현되고 있는 생협의 정체성을 설명하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 연구대상은 한국의 4대 생협인 두레생협, 아이쿱, 한살림, 행복중심생협이고 중점적인 분석 대상은조합원 수가 가장 많은 아이쿱과 한살림의 웹사이트의 2021년 10월부터 2개월 동안 홈페이지와‘소개’(about us) 페이지다. 행복중심과 두레의 웹사이트는 비교 대상으로 선택했다. 선행 연구들은홈페이지가 정체성을 읽을 수 있는 텍스트라고 인정했고, 본 연구는 언어를 통해 특정 대상에 대한사회적 의미를 구성하는 담론실천으로 인터넷 웹사이트를 이해하기 때문에 홈페이지를 담론분석했다. 그 결과, 한국 생협들의 정체성은 다양하다는 것을 발견했는데, 조직 정체성, 조합원 호명, 상품에 대한 호칭, 관련 조직 호칭, 생산자와 소비자에 대한 인식에서 차이를 보였다. 한살림은 생산자우선 패러다임을 갖고, 아이쿱은 ‘나’, ‘개인’을 선호하는 독특성을 보였다. 아이쿱은 관련 조직을 관계사로, 한살림은 한살림가족으로, 두레와 행복중심생협은 회원생협으로 호칭하고, 공동구매품에 대해서 아이쿱은 상품과 식품, 한살림은 물품, 두레와 행복중심생협은 생활재로 칭하고 있어 차이를보였다. 이러한 차이에도 불구하고 한국의 4대 생협 조직들은 ‘함께 행복한 사회’에 가치를 부여하는 조직이라는 점, 기후위기 상황에서 지구를 지키는 활동을 하는 조직이라는 점에서 공통점을 갖는다. 이 연구는 협동조합의 웹사이트를 분석한 첫 시도라는 점에서 학문적 기여를 인정받을 수 있을 것이다.
염찬희 한국협동조합연구소 2015 협동조합네트워크 Vol.- No.68
This paper aims to explore the economic, political, social conditions for building and sustaining co-operative communities from Saskatchewanarea case. This paper is focused on the process of making and sustaining the co-operative community, disinterested in the origins of it, tracks the actors in the community, describes concretely their activities, explains the structure change of the society. This paper got a hint from the actor-network theory as an useful perspective that see a co-operative as an actor on the network and as a network linked some networks. Living conditions in Saskatchewan-area were so bad that farmers had to co-operate for survival and prosperity. This paper examines how some actors like the leading co-operatives and the Saskatchewan Wheat Pool, the Co-operative Credit Society, the Saskatchewan state government, co-operative philosophy, co-operative cultures, A. Sapiro etc. have interacted with each other or with economic political social conditions while building the cooperative community in that area.