http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 엄성희 ( Sung-hee Eum ) (검색결과 3 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
엄성희 ( Eum Sung Hee ) 건국대학교 법학연구소 2021 一鑑法學 Vol.0 No.48
기술 및 지식재산권에 대한 중요성 및 필요성에 대한 인식은 이미 전 세계적으로 중요한 자산으로 분류하고 있다. 기술 및 지식재산권은 다양한 활용이 가능하다. 기업의 공격 및 방어수단으로 경쟁기업에 이용할 수 도 있으며, 또한 자본적 활용으로 이용이 가능하다. 이는 지식재산권이라는 법적으로 부여된 가치를 가지는 재산권이라 가능한 부분이다. 기술 및 지식재산권은 모두 그 가치를 가지고 있는 주요 자산이다. 그러나 이 두 개의 요소는 구별에 모호성을 가지고 있으며, 법률상 정의에 있어서도 이러한 문제를 나타내고 있으며, 이러한 부분은 사업화 관련 법률에서 유기적이고 명확한 법률의 뒷받침이 이루어지고 있지 못함은 혼란과 의문을 가중할 뿐이며, 이는 기술과 지식재산권의 구별을 명확히 하지 못하고 있음에 기인하고 있다. 본고는 기술과 지식재산권의 명확한 법적 정의 및 구별을 통해 관련 법제의 긴밀한 유기성 및 경계성을 고민하고자 하며, 이러한 부분은 빠르게 변화하는 기술 및 지식재산권의 트렌드에 대응하는 법제의 실무적 모습일 것으로 생각된다. The recognition of the importance and necessity of technology and intellectual property rights has already been classified as an important asset worldwide. Technology and intellectual property rights can be used in various ways. It can be used by competitors as a means of attack and defense by companies, and can also be used for capital use. It is possible because it has the legally granted value of intellectual property rights. Both technical and intellectual property rights are major assets of their value. However, these two factors have ambiguity in the distinction and represent this problem in legal definitions, which only adds confusion and doubt to the lack of support for organic and clear legislation in commercial law, which does not clarify the distinction between technology and intellectual property. Through clear legal definitions and distinctions between technology and intellectual property rights, we would like to consider the close organic and vigilance of related legislation, which would be a practical aspect of legislation in response to rapidly changing technology and intellectual property trends.
-
엄성희 ( Sung-hee Eum ),정연덕 ( Yeu-dek Chung ) 단국대학교 법학연구소 2016 법학논총 Vol.40 No.2
Facilitating the utilization of patents is increasingly important to promote innovation in this globalize world. Since technology innovation is such an important that it can determine a company’s economic growth and competitive enhancement, all the companies make lots of investment and efforts for technological innovation. As outcomes of technological innovation, there are patent rights. and that are mostly approved as a legal right called IPRs. To activate such an patent rights, financing techniques are needed for enterprises to rise funds through collaterals, such as technical and Patent rights. In reality, however, any IP related financial system is not really carry out an objective and reliable valuation on IP as a collateral for the activation of IP finance, this study intends to investigate various different methods of patent valuation need for IP finance
-
지식재산금융에 있어 특허담보대출을 위한 특허가치평가 산정기준 제시 연구
김용규 ( Kim Yong Kyu ),엄성희 ( Eum Sung Hee ),이철규 ( Lee Cheol Gyu ) 연세대학교 법학연구원 2016 法學硏究 Vol.26 No.3
All the countries of the world. has been a national agenda innovation for ensuring national competitiveness for the next generation. These innovations are the important factors that determine the strengthening of competitiveness and economic growth of the country and companies, is inclined a lot of effort. Not only the importance of securing patent rights, has also emerged a problem of utilization promotion. That can be the representative in the utilization of patent right, can be a patent based commercializing. Secure business funds in these patents commercialization can be the most important element. In the case of small and medium-sized enterprises and founding company, also to ensure the excellent patent rights, because it is difficult to secure business funds, it does not take advantage of the patent. Patent security loan system to be able to raise business funds to secure the patent for the founder of the small and medium-sized enterprises to credit and loans in order to raise business funds is insufficient has been enforced. Patent secured loan is a financial support capable system to evaluate only the patent rights to the collateral subject. However, in practice, patent, an objective and is it can not be performed with high reliability evaluation reality patents as financial security. Therefore, in this paper, based on the punitive damages system, trying to present the evaluation criteria for a paten security loan.
KCI
KISS연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
