http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
마이봄샘 기능이상을 동반한 안구건조증 환자에서 온열마사지치료기기의 임상적 유용성
김대우,권영아,송상률,김병엽,정재림,Dai Woo Kim,MD,Young A Kwon,MD,Sang Wroul Song,MD,Byoung Yeop Kim,MD,Jae Lim Chung,MD 대한안과학회 2013 대한안과학회지 Vol.54 No.9
Purpose: To evaluate the clinical usefulness of KCL 990<sup>® for the treatment of dry eye with meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). Methods: Patients (n = 54 eyes, 27 subjects) diagnosed with dry eye with MGD were recruited for a prospective, one-month clinical trial. Patients received a twice-a-day 15-minute treatment using the KCL 990?. Effectiveness parameters included patient symptom scores using the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaires, tear osmolarity measured with TearLab<sup>® (TearLab Corporation, San Diego, CA, USA), classical tear break-up time (TBUT), and objective TBUT value using an Optical Quality Analysis System (OQAS<sup>®, Visiometrics, Castelldefels, Spain). Data are presented for pre-treatment (baseline) and at 1 week and 1 month post-treatment. An objective TBUT value was estimated in each eye when the optical scattering index (OSI) started to increase consistently, and data were obtained at pretreatment (baseline) and at 1 month post-treatment. Results: The symptom scores on OSDI questionnaires, tear osmolarity, and tear break-up time improved significantly from baseline to one week (p < 0.05). This improvement was maintained with no significant regression at 1 month (p < 0.05). The objective TBUT value decreased significantly at 1 month (p < 0.05). Conclusions: KCL 990<sup>® contributed to improve not only signs and symptoms of dry eye with MGD, but also the function of the tear film and ocular surface.
수평각막직경을 포함한 전안부 계측에 있어서 슬릿광주사 각막형태검사기와 저간섭성 반사계의 비교
이택관,박지현,강효정,권영아,송상률,김병엽,정재림.Taek Kwan Rhee. MD. Ji Hyun Park. MD. Hyo Jeong Kang. MD. Young A Kwon. MD.Sang Wroul Song. MD. Byoung Yeop Kim. MD. Jae Lim Chung. MD 대한안과학회 2014 대한안과학회지 Vol.55 No.5
Purpose: To compare the results of anterior segment biometry including white-to-white (WTW) between scanning-slit topography (ORBscan IIz<sup>®, Bausch & Lomb), optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR) biometry (Lenstar<sup>®, Haag-Streit), and Castroviejo calipers. Methods: Measurements on 72 eyes of 36 patients that underwent refractive surgery were measured using ORBscan<sup>®, Lenstar<sup>®, and calipers and compared. Ocular biometry parameters used in this study included the WTW, central corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth (ACD), keratometry, and pupil size. Results: The WTW measurements using ORBscan<sup>® and calipers (11.57 ± 0.35 mm and 11.58 ± 0.34 mm, respectively) were statistically similar. However, the measurement using Lenstar<sup>® (12.05 ± 0.40 mm) was significantly greater than with the other methods (<em>p</em> < 0.001). Central corneal thickness and keratometry measurements using ORBscan<sup>® were greater than when using Lenstar<sup>® (<em>p</em> = 0.01 for both). ACD and pupil size measurement using Lenstar<sup>® were greater than when using ORBscan<sup>® (<em>p</em> < 0.001 for both). Conclusions: Because WTW and ACD measurements using Lenstar<sup>® were greater than when using ORBscan<sup>® and calipers, unexpected high-vaulting may be observed due to the selection of a larger-sized posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens. Therefore, the differences in measurements obtained when using these methods should be considered. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 2014;55(5):656-661