http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
휴대전화 전자파 위험인식과 리스크커뮤니케이션 - 여성의 위험인식을 중심으로 -
김경희,송대종,최재욱,Kim, Kyung-Hee,Song, Dae-Jong,Choi, Jae-Wook 한국전자통신학회 2013 한국전자통신학회 논문지 Vol.8 No.7
The study examined how the risk perception of cellular phone electromagnetic waves' possibility to harm human bodies would be psychologically different by gender and age. The study measured the risk perception targeting a total of 1,001 men and women in their twenties and more living in six major cities in Korea. According to the results, for the risk perception by gender, the women would recognize the risk of cellular phone electromagnetic waves more than the men. Among the women, those in their fifties appeared to have the greatest risk perception. In particular, the risk perception difference by age and gender was observed to be affected by psychological factors and, the study should be regarded academically significant for having verified the importance. For general people, they would perceive the risk via those psychological factors as experiences in daily life. Therefore, in order to relieve social conflicts caused by the risk, basic risk communication based on proper understanding of how the general people would recognize the risk should be provided. Hence, the study is expected to be a chance for intervention strategy research on how our community would proceed with communication and how the community, again, apprehends the cellular phone electromagnetic waves as well. 본 연구는 휴대전화 전자파의 인체유해 가능성에 대한 위험인식을 성별 및 연령에 따라 심리적 요인이 어떻게 차이가 발생하는지 원인을 분석하였다. 위험인식의 측정은 전국 6대 도시에 거주하고 있는 20대 이상 남녀 1,001명을 대상으로 실시하였다. 분석 결과 성별에 따른 위험인식의 차이는 여성이 남성보다 휴대전화 전자파에 대한 위험인식이 높았으며, 여성의 경우 50대의 위험인식이 가장 높았다. 특히 연령 및 성별에서의 위험인식 차이는 심리적 요인의 영향에서 발견하였고 그 중요성을 실증했다는데 이론적 함의를 찾을 수 있었다. 일반인은 위험인식을 심리적 요인과 같은 일상의 경험 등의 축적을 통해 위험을 인식하기 때문에 위험을 둘러싼 사회적 갈등을 완화하기 위해서는 일반인이 어떻게 위험을 인식하는지에 대한 올바른 이해에 기초한 위험커뮤니케이션을 제공해야 해야 할 것이다. 따라서 본 연구를 통해 우리사회가 어떻게 휴대전화 전자파에 대한 위험을 판단하고, 의사소통해 나갈 것인지에 대한 개입전략연구의 기반을 제공하고자 하였다.
김경희(Kyung Hee Kim),이승길(Seung Kil Lee),송대종(Dae Jong Song),김해준(Hae-Joon Kim),조삼래(Sam Rae Cho),두용균(Yong Kyoon Doo),최재욱(Jae Wook Choi) 한국위험물학회 2013 한국위험물학회지 Vol.1 No.1
The purpose of this study was to determine the difference rate of the results for classification of chemicals by the criteria of GHS between Korea and Japan. A total of 200 chemicals with same Chemical Abstractive Service (CAS) number in Korea and Japan were finally selected for comparison. In order to determine the difference rate of for classification of chemicals, we compared the results in 15 classes (13 classes for health hazard and 2 classes for environmental hazard). Moreover, we analyzed the causes for leading to the different outcomes. The overall matching rate was 55.7%. The lowest matching rates were observed in ‘single exposure (27.5%)’ and ‘repeat exposure (37.0%)’ categories among the ‘specific target organ toxicity’ hazard class. Similarly, the highest matching rates were found in “Respiratory sensitization” and “Aspiration hazard” (94.0%, 91.0% for each). This study indicates that outcomes classified and labeled by GHS among countries could be different because they have performed the classification of chemicals by their own standards and interpretation of GHS. To minimize these differences, it is necessary to establish the technical guideline including the standardization for criteria of GHS internationally, the standardization of process in determination by experts, and provision of same reference list to be used, through an international or multi-party GHS expert committee.