http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
KDP, PKK의 정치이념과 쿠르드 민족주의에 관한 연구
박주성 ( Joo Seong Park ),임채완 ( Chae Wan Lim ) 한국외국어대학교 중동연구소 2016 중동연구 Vol.35 No.1
This study is a comparative analysis of the ideological choice of the two representative Kurdish political groups, KDP in Iraq and PKK in Turkey, in their ethnic movement and the separatist movement against their strong ruling nation. The purpose of this comparative analysis is to research the political ideologies of KDP and PKK, to research how they treated Kurdish nationalism on the basis of their political ideologies. In additon, the purpose of this comparative analysis is to research the features, goals, political and economic system of the pursuit of political ideologies of KDP and PKK. Political ideology is an important variable for their ethnic conflict and separatist movements, because it regulate all kind of action of two political groups. Therefore internally, political ideology defining character of their political groups and presenting integration way of their political community, goals, mobilization and the way of action, the members of the organization, externally determined international alliance with regional and global powers. KDP was accepted nationalism on the based of tribalism and this tribalism is similar to realism in the features international politics, interests and survival. So it is a receptive tribalism. KDP mobilized all kurds resources to build their Kurdish nation-state. On the other hand, the PKK rejected Kurd nationalism, because Marxism-Leninism insist that the coexistence of all ethnics under the communist system without nationalism. Thus the Kurdish nation is just one of the means for their step to the communist society. As we see that there is a significant difference between the two political groups, KDP treated the Kurd nationalism as goal, PKK considered the Kurd nationalism as just a means.
이란 쿠르드족 분리독립운동단체에 관한 연구 - KDPI와 Komala의 이념을 중심으로 -
박주성(Park, Joo-Seong) 한국이슬람학회 2017 한국이슬람학회논총 Vol.27 No.1
This study analyzed the characteristics and limitations of KDPI and Komala which were representative Kurdish Separate Independent movement Parties led the armed struggle in Iran. As a result, first, KDP was founded as a nationalist party covering the left and right and Komala was founded with city nationalists. But after Mahabad Republic had been collapsed, KDPI was born again nation-pursue type party without the left and rebuilted Komala was reborn as a Marxism-Leninism-pursue type party. Second, as a result the political opposition and conflict each other for hegemony of the two parties was occured. Third, the cessation of leadership was serious. Fourth, Iran had stable political circumstance then Iraq and had overwhelmingly military forces than KDPI and Komala, so armed struggle of the Kurds had been limited. Fifth, international alliance with the regional countries and global powers was collapsed, Because of these five causes, it was stagnated that the ability of the armed ethnic conflict of KDPI and Komala in Iran. Kurdish nationalist movement in Iran was also stagnated by these same reason. So there is need much times for KDPI and Komala to recover there ability of its own armed force when they were prosperity.