http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
증거기반 실제를 위한국내 쓰기 학습장애 중재연구 질 분석
이예다나 ( Ye Da Na Lee ),조성희 ( Sung Hee Cho ),마지성 ( Ji Sung Ma ),박현정 ( Hyun Jung Park ),손승현 ( Seung Hyun Son ) 한국특수아동학회 2014 특수아동교육연구 Vol.16 No.2
This study analyzed a total of 33 writing intervention studies published in 2000 to 2013 based on the quality indicators in order to identify the evidence-based intervention which was effective for improving the writing performance of students with learning disabilities. A total of 33 articles were systematically analyzed in terms of types of intervention, research participants, research methods and results. The results of this study were as follows: First, most studies except for one study provided composition in writing instructional components for elementary school students. Second, there were none experimental group designs with random assignment. Third, the instruments for measuring dependent variable were developed or modified by the researchers. The results of analysis of quality indicator showed that the studies using group design studies and single subject research had not met all the indicators. The intervention descriptions were not provided to be replicated, and the information for the measurement were not provided in details. The description for the baseline and internal validity were not provided in details. Based on the results, the implication for educating students with LD and future research issues were discussed.
ADHD학생의 문제행동 중재를 위한 단일대상연구의 전반적인 동향 분석과 CEC 질적 지표에 의한 분석 - 문제행동유형을 중심으로
길한아 ( Kil Han-ah ),김미령 ( Jin Mei-ling ),마지성 ( Ma Ji-sung ),정다이 ( Jung Da-i ),( Sakura Yusuke ),손승현 ( Son Seung-hyun ) 대구대학교 한국특수교육문제연구소 2019 특수교육저널 : 이론과 실천 Vol.20 No.2
The purpose of this study was to examine the general characteristics of behavioral interventions for improving behavioral problems of ADHD students and to identify the level of quality of these behaviors, I would like to elaborate concrete improvement measures that need to be taken to draw implications and to make a single subject study with a qualitative level. The first analysis showed that there were a total of 18 papers with Carelessness (distraction) as a dependent variable, followed by 11 studies with Hyperactivity , 9 studies with Impulsiveness, 8 studies with Aggressive Behavior, 4 studies with Out of seat, 3 studies with Interrupting, 2 studies with Noise and 1 study with Fuss. Second, we analyze the eight areas of CEC qualitative indicators : context and environment, participant, mediator, explanation of intervention, fidelity of implementation, internal validity, dependent variable and data analysis. As a result, the dependent variable area and data analysis area had the highest rate of 96%, and the fidelity of implementation area showed the lowest satisfaction rate, which was 13.3%. Based on the results of the analysis, the limitations of this study and the future tasks of the study on intervention problem behavior for ADHD students were discussed.
손승현 ( Seung Hyun Son ),이예다나 ( Ye Da Na Lee ),조성희 ( Sung Hee Cho ),문주영 ( Ju Yeong Moon ),마지성 ( Ji Sung Ma ),강민 ( Min Kang ) 안암교육학회 2013 한국교육학연구 Vol.19 No.2
본 연구에서는 장애대학생의 성공적인 대학생활을 위한 대학교육 전반에 걸친 지원 프로그램의 연구동향을 파악하고 분석하였다. 이를 통해 향후 대학 내 장애학생 대상 지원 프로그램에 대한 시사점을 도출하고 앞으로 나아갈 방향을 제안하고자 하였다. 본 연구의 분석 자료는 장애인 특수교육대상자 대학입학 특별전형제도가 시작된 1995년부터 2012년 12월까지 한국연구재단 등재 또는 등재후보지의 학술지에 발표된 총 38편의 논문을 선정하였다. 선정된 논문을 우선 입학 전, 대학생활 중, 졸업 후 취업을 위한 지원으로 나누고 연구방법, 연구대상, 지원 분야, 지원 내용의 세부 분야별로 구분하여 연구의 동향을 살펴보았다. 또한 연구논문에서 실제 지원 프로그램을 제공한 연구가 대학 현장에서 어떻게 활용되고 있는지 그 내용을 구체적으로 살펴보았다. 장애학생 지원을 위한 연구 동향을 살펴본 결과 제도적인 변화에 따른 요구가 연구에 반영되었으며, 연구주제는 실태조사가 대부분을 차지하였다. 연구대상은 시각장애와 청각장애 학생들을 대상으로 한 연구가 대다수였다. 실제적인 지원을 제공한 분야는 대학생활 중 교수-학습 지원이 가장 많은 비중을 차지하였다. 또한 입학 전?대학생활 중·졸업 후 취업을 위한 지원으로 볼 때 입학 전, 졸업 후에 비하여 대학생활 중과 관련된 논문이 다수를 차지하였다. 이러한 연구결과들을 토대로 향후 다양한 연구 분야와 대상을 확장하여 장애대학생을 위한 개별화된 지원서비스의 필요성 등을 제안하였다. The purpose of this study was to analyze the research trends on support for college students with disabilities and suggest diverse support service programs for college students with disabilities to be successful in college life. The search procedures using the Web-database system were implemented to find the proper research from 1995 to 2012. A total of 38 articles met the criteria for analysis and were included in this review. Each article was analyzed according to pre-college (transition to higher education), college (Success learning program in higher education), post-college (work and higher education). Studies were analyzed by research methods, disability type, what type of services were provided. Results of the study are as follow: research trends reflected the changes in regulations and laws by the government. Additionally, it was found that most of the research methods were survey and most of the subjects in research were college students with visual and sensory disabilities. The result showed that the contents areas of research were concentrated teaching and learning services and support for students with disabilities and focused success learning program in the college life. Based on the results of the study, a variety of research areas and practical support was suggested, and additionally an individualized learning service program for college students with disabilities were discussed and suggested future researches.