http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
나병철 현대문학이론학회 2002 現代文學理論硏究 Vol.0 No.18
This thesis was written to study the discovery of modern subject and the Other in reality of colony. From the results of this study, followings are confirmed. Our People tried to obtain modern subjectivity during the 1900s. But we could experience modern subject only in ideal. It was 1910s that we really experienced modernity. That period is the moment that we discovered the individual. But instead of the discovery of the individual subject, we losed the communal unity and the independence of nation. Thus we could experience modernity through the Other reality. From the result of this. we experienced the division of the subject in ideal and the Other in reality. It represent the division of editorial discourse and narrative discourse. I studied this division of editorial discourse and narrative discourse by the comparative of the narrative in 1900s and the novel in 1910s. The novels in 1910s represent the division of editorial discourse and narrative discourse, while the narratives in 1900s represent the unity of them. To prove this, I studied the novel Hyeon Sang-Yun and Yand Geon-Sik(1910s). And I studied the novel of Yeom Sang-Seob(1920s) also. The division of editorial discourse and narrative discourse which discovered in their editorial(or essay) and novel represents the division of the community and the individual. And this also represents the aporia of the ideal of enlightenment and the agony of the Other in reality. Our People could experience modernity through this discovery of the Other in dark reality.
나병철 현대문학이론학회 2001 現代文學理論硏究 Vol.15 No.-
This paper examines the genealoty of the subject in relation to the origin of Korean Modern literature. It premises that the oeeurrence of Korean modern literature lie in the field of contentions. This paper studies expecially the novel of Lee Kwang Soo and Yeom Sang Sub. Lee Kwang Soo' novel obtains the full insides of the hero by receiving the new civilization as the father. But this is the colonialist nationalism which confines the antion in Oedipus structure. On the contrary, the confessional novel of Yeom Sang Sub does not premise naionalism. I reveal that the hero of his novel experiences the other of new civilization in reality. This experience of the other of new civilization reveals the schizophreniac subject. The schizophreniac subject of the confessional novel represents the important pedigree of genealogy in the process of forming of Korean modern literature. This Suject implies anti-Oedipus structure. The subversion of the Oedipus structure is essential in Korean modern literature and the discover of modern nationhood. Korean modern literature does not begine with new civility and the full insides of suject, but with the other of new civility and the schizophreniac subject. And The schizophreniac suject in novel appears again in aesthetic modernism in 1930's.
가토에서 Thiopental 과 Propofol의 피하주사에 따른 염증반응
오제환,나병수,이보령,박정원,정용훈,백종화,우영철,김진윤,박선규,구길회,오수원 대한마취과학회 2002 Korean Journal of Anesthesiology Vol.43 No.4
Background: Thiopental and propofol are the most widely used intravenous anesthetics as induction agents in general anesthesia. Thiopental is a very strong alkaline drug, and when it is extravasated, it can cause pain and skin necrosis. Propofol also can cause pain on injection in many populations. Therefore, we planed this study to compare inflammatory reactions of skin tissues after subdermal injections of thiopental and propofol in rabbits. Methods: Four rabbits were divided into 2 groups: Standard dose (S) group and double dose (D) group. In the S group, thiopental 0.4 ml and propofol 0.4 ml were injected subcutaneoudly on each side of the posterior proximal ear. In the D group, the dose was doubled to 0.8 ml of each drug and injection was done in the same manner. Skin tissue at the injection sites were excised after 1 day, 3 days, and 7 days. Then each skin tissue slide was examined under an optical microsccpe. Results: In the S group, the inflammatory reaction after the subdermal injection of 2.5% thiopental revealed a more progressed and more severe pattern than 1% propofol. In the D group, the inflammatory reaction after a subdermal injection of 2.5% thiopental revealed a more progressed and more severe pattern than 1% propofol at 3 days, but there was no significant difference in the degree of progression and severity between the 2 drugs at 7 days. Conclusions: When propofol is extravasated during continuous infusion for maintenance of anesthesia, it can cause distinct inflammatory reaction; though the inflammatory reaction is milder and the possibility of complications is lower than with thiopental. (Korean J Anesthesiol 2002; 43: 485~493)