http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
윤규석,정화순,최태열,김신규,김춘원,김기홍 한양대학교 의과대학 1985 한양의대 학술지 Vol.5 No.2
Authors have compaired te results of HBsAg, Anti-HBsAb that were examined by RIA (radioimmunoassay), EIA (enzyme immunoassay) and RPHA (reverse passive hamagglutimation) methods. The results are summarized as follows. 1) In HBsAg test, RPHA method disclosed 95.3% sensitivity and 100% specificity. 2) In HBsAg tests, EIA method disclosed 94.7% sensitivity and 100% specificity. 3) In Anti-HBsAb tests, PHA method disclosed 57.3% sensitivity and 96.7% specificity. 4) In AntiHBsAb tests, EIA method disclosed 90.7% sensitivity and 100% specificity.