http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
언어네트워크 분석 기법을 활용한 인간배아복제 신문보도 분석
김만재(Kim, Manjae),전방욱(Jun, Bang-Ook) 한국생명윤리학회 2012 생명윤리 Vol.13 No.2
본 연구에서는 1998년 12월 경희의료원, 2001년 11월 미국의 어드밴스드 셀 테크놀로지사(ACT)와 2004년 2월 황우석연구진의 인간배아복제 관련 연구 결과를 보도한 신문 기사 내용을 비교 분석하여, 인간배아복제에 대한 언론의 보도 성향을 파악하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 본 연구는 각 사례가 등장한 초기 이틀 동안의 신문 기사를 수집하여 언어네트워크 분석을 실시하였다. 분석 결과를 보면, 경희의료원 사례의 경우에는, ‘복제’가 네트워크의 중심적 위치를 차지하면서 ‘장기’, ‘치료’, ‘성공’과 같은 긍정적 단어들과 연결될 뿐만 아니라 ‘윤리’, ‘시민단체’와 같은 단어들과도 연결되어 시민단체가 반대 목소리를 내는 중심축을 형성하고 있음을 알 수 있었다. ACT 사례에 있어서는, 네트워크 중심에 있는 ‘복제’가 한편으로는 ‘치료’와 ‘성공’이라는 긍정적 단어와 강하게 연결되어 있으면서, 다른 한편으로는 ‘반대’, ‘금지’와 같은 부정적인 단어와도 강하게 연결되어, 찬반 양론의 논의가 명확한 것으로 나타났다. 이에 반해 황우석연구진 사례의 경우에는, ‘줄기세포’가 네트워크의 중심에서 ‘국제적’, ‘성공’, ‘치료’와 같은 긍정적 단어와 강하게 연관되는 반면, ‘반대’, ‘금지’, ‘시민단체’와 같은 부정적 단어와는 약하게 연관되어 전반적으로 줄기세포에 대한 긍정적 평가가 높은 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 연구 결과는 세 사례가 등장하였던 5년이라는 기간 동안에 인간배아복제에 대한 한국 언론의 프레임이 긍정적으로 변화하였다는 것을 시사한다. This study compares newspaper articles concerning three major human embryo cloning cases initiated by the Kyung Hee University Medical Center in December 1998, the Advanced Cell Technology (ACT) in November 2001, and Hwang Woo Suk research team in February 2004. To use a semantic network analysis, 93 articles in total were collected during the first two days in each case. The analysis shows that ‘cloning’ occupies the central position in the case of the Kyung Hee University Medical Center, while strongly networking with positive words such as ‘organ’, ‘treatment’, and ‘success’, as well as negative words such as ‘ethics’ and ‘civic organization’, which implies that civic organizations raise their voice against cloning. In the case of ACT, too, ‘cloning’ is the central word in a network diagram. Unlike the case of the Kyung Hee University Medical Center, however, the analysis of ACT case clearly indicates a sharp conflict between positive response represented by ‘treatment’ and ‘success’ and negative reports using words like ‘objection’ and ‘prohibition’. By contrast, in the Hwang Woo Suk research team case, ‘stem cell’ is the word at the center, strongly networking with positive words including ‘international’, ‘success’, and ‘treatment’, while weakly networking with negative words such as ‘objection’, ‘prohibition’, ‘civic organization’, which represents a positive image of‘stem cell’. These results address that Korean newspapers have contributed to building a more positive frame regarding human embryo cloning for five years of reporting three major human embryo cloning cases.
전방욱(JUN Bang-Ook),김만재(KIM Manjae) 한국생명윤리학회 2003 생명윤리 Vol.4 No.1
This paper analyzes Korean newspaper articles of human embryo cloning between October 1997 and April 2003 to find out current conditions and problems of nine major newspapers in reporting the subject. For this purpose, the total of 674 articles are categorized into four reporting frames, such as science development, public responsibility, economic development and ethical orientation, and four scales of positivity regarding human embryo cloning, such as affirmation, conditional affirmation, negation, and no particular relation. The results of analysis show that scientific articles are rare to find and most newspapers heavily depend on university affiliated scientists except the Kukmin Daily which cites the religious most frequently. In terms of four news frames, public responsibility frame is the most popular, whereas economic development turns out to be the least. Scientists tends to stress science development along with public responsibility. By contrast, the religious and social movement groups hardly support science development frame. Regarding the positivity of human embryo cloning, government officials, businessmen, medical organizations, and university and research affiliated scientists stand for the positive extreme, and the religious, women's and environment movement groups, and university and research affiliated non-scientists represent the negative extreme, while parliament members are in between. Most newspapers similarly emphasize public responsibility the most, and then science development, ethical orientation, and economic development in order. However, there are some differences among newspapers according to their cited sources. For example, the Kukmin Daily's dependence on the religious is strongly related with its emphasis on ethical orientation as well as public responsibility, and the Hankyoreh's diverse sources also reflect its relative balance. Finally, this paper reveals that Korean newspapers depend heavily upon two major scientists of human embryo cloning, which can easily mislead the public by presenting their interests only. Therefore, it is crucial to include diverse opinions and avoid the interested parties in dealing with ethically debatable subject such as human embryo cloning.
전방욱(Bang-Ook Jun),김만재(Manjae Kim) 이화여자대학교 생명의료법연구소 2008 생명윤리정책연구 Vol.2 No.3
The study of bioethics is interdisciplinary in nature, requiring value judgments of humanities and information from the natural sciences. But this characteristic has been taken for granted without discussing openly within the filed. Therefore, this paper aims to analyze problems of studying bioethics as an interdisciplinary discipline. Preliminary survey results vividly reveal the gap between recognition and reality. Korean bioethicists fully recognize that the field is interdisciplinary. In reality, however, they hardly initiate interdisciplinary studies. They consider the difficulties of finding right co-researchers as a main reason of preventing them from trying interdisciplinary researches. Therefore, it is essential to provide bioethicists from diverse fields with an information and opportunities to contact.