http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
만성질환자의 질병수용에 대한 개념분석: 혼종모형을 이용하여
고일선(Ko, Il Sun),지현주(Ji, Hyunju),홍소윤(Hong, Soyun),정은영(Jung, Eunyoung) 기본간호학회 2021 기본간호학회지 Vol.28 No.1
Purpose: This study was done clarify the concept of illness acceptance in patients with chronic disease. Methods: This study was conducted using a hybrid model of concept analysis that consists of three phases. In the theoretical phase, a working definition was formulated through a systematic review. In the fieldwork phase, five participants who had diabetes or hypertension for at least one year were interviewed. In the third phase, the results were combined in the final analysis. Results: There are three phases of accepting an illness: experiencing the limits, disease management, and designing new life. At the experience of the limits and disease management stages, the attributes of physical, psychological and social domains were derived, but at the stage of designing their new life, integrated attributes of these three domains were derived. Conclusion: Illness acceptance of chronic disease was defined as a continuous and dynamic process in three phases. First, patients experience limitations due to the disease, such as physical illness, psychological instability, and difficulty performing social roles. Second, patients manage the disease by engaging in self-management, psychological coping strategies, and establishing social support. Third, patients design their new life by seeking better health-related quality of life and integrating the illness into their everyday life. However, patients experienced negative changes when disease management was not performed properly. The fact that illness acceptance could be cyclic means the difference between illness and loss/death acceptance. Nurse should develop and provide an integrated nursing intervention that is appropriate for phases of illness acceptance.
임상연구코디네이터의 역할수행에 대한 연구자와 임상시험모니터요원의 인식비교
고일선(Ko, Il-Sun),황윤선(Hwang, Youn-Sun),김호곤(Kim, Ho-Kon) 한국산학기술학회 2014 한국산학기술학회논문지 Vol.15 No.8
본 연구는 임상연구코디네이터와 함께 임상시험을 수행하는 연구자 및 임상시험모니터요원이 인식하는 임상연구코 디네이터의 역할수행 정도를 비교분석하기 위한 조사연구이다. 본 연구의 자료는 2011년 3월 7일부터 11월 30일까지 4개 병원의 연구자 39명과 임상시험모니터요원 68명을 대상으로 구조화된 설문지를 활용하여 수집하였고, 기술통계와 t-test를 이용하여 분석하였다. 연구자와 임상시험모니터요원 모두 임상시험에서의 임상연구코디네이터의 역할수행이 매우 중요하다 고 인식하고 있었고, 그 중에서도 대상자 관리 업무에의 역할 수행 비중이 가장 높다고 인식하고 있었다. 그러나 각 항목별 역할수행 정도에 관해 연구자 집단과 임상시험모니터요원 집단 간 인식 정도를 비교해 보면 차이가 나타났다. 따라서 임상연 구코디네이터의 역할수행에 대한 인력 간 인식 차이를 줄일 수 있는 보다 객관적인 임상연구코디네이터의 업무기술 및 지침 개발이 요구된다. The aim of this study was to compare the perceptions of the role performance of a clinical research coordinator (CRC) between the investigators and clinical research associates (CRAs). Data was collected using a structured questionnaire from 39 investigators and 68 CRAs in 4 hospitals from March 7 to November 30, 2011 and analyzed using descriptive statistics and a t-test. The investigators and CRAs were aware of the importance of CRC`s role and they all gave the highest values for patients care management. On the other hand, the score of the role performance items showed perceptional differences between investigators and CRAs. Therefore, the development of detailed job descriptions and manuals will be needed to reduce the perceptional differences in the role performance of the CRC.
국내 학술지에 게재된 영성 관련 측정도구의 측정속성: 체계적 문헌고찰
고일선(Ko, Il-Sun),김진숙(Kim, Jin Sook),최소영(Choi, Soyoung) 기본간호학회 2021 기본간호학회지 Vol.28 No.1
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the measurement properties of spirituality-related assessment tools published in Korean journals. Methods: The databases used to search the literature reporting use of the spirituality-related assessment tools were RISS, NDSL, DBpia, KoreaMed, and KISS. The quality of the measurement properties was evaluated based on the reported internal consistency, content validity, criterion validity, construct validity, reproducibility, responsiveness, floor-ceiling effects and interpretability based on the tools review criteria suggested by Terwee et al. Results: Twenty-five assessment tools (including 7 original Korean versions) were identified from the 208 Korean studies published up to November, 2016. All of the 25 tools reported internal consistency and content validity; construct validity was reported in 21 tools while only six tools had reported on criterion validity. None of the studies reported on the reproducibility, responsiveness, and floor-ceiling effects. Among 25 spirituality-related assessment tools, the spiritual well-being scale was identified as the most commonly used tool for spirituality assessment. Conclusion: Among 25 spirituality-related assessment tools used in Korean studies, all of them satisfied only three criteria out of the eight criteria for measurement properties, internal consistency, content validity, and interpretability. The results of this study provide evidence to develop reliable and valid tools that will satisfy the criteria for measurement properties. In addition, standardized, reliable, and valid assessment tools must be chosen for spirituality-related study.