http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
외발 소수자 ‘兀者’의 함의 고찰 ― <양생주>와 <덕충부>를 중심으로
高志英 ( Ko¸ Jiyoung ) 중국어문연구회 2021 中國語文論叢 Vol.- No.107
There are many disabled people in Zhuangzi. Among them, Youshi of Yangshengzhu, Wang Tai of Dechongfu, Shen Tujia and Shushan The Toeless are an acquired disabled people. Youshi was expressed as one foot and the other three people was expressed as Wuzhe(兀者). In Shuowen, the word Wu (兀) means “high and flat above”. However, Kangxi dictionary added the meaning “cutting feet”. However, in the original sense of Wu(兀), Wuzhe(兀者) was not just a punished person, but also highly educated, could have been the one who received the “Criminal Punishment Of Cutting Off The Feet”. Those who have been punished and cut their foot are likely to have been involved in matters of national interest. It also shows that, in reverse terms, they were in positions that could affect national interests. It is not clear why the people in Zhuangzi were cut their foot, but Zhuang Zi’s descriptions suggest that they were in some position and were well-educated. Therefore, the three Wuzhe(兀者) characters in Dechongfu should not be regarded as “the person with their feet cut off”, but rather as a double meaning, adding to the meaning of “Proud Loneliness”. Just like “Sun Bin(孫臏)”. Zhuang Zi showed “life(生)” through Youshi, and “virtue(德)” through Wuzhe (兀者). This can be said to be not only a role model for the disabled to grow and nurture their remaining lives, but also a token or an example if they are full of their inner virtues.
「소요유」에 나타난 장자의 논리적 글쓰기: 아리스토텔레스의 수사학을 기준으로
고지영(Jiyoung Ko) 한국동서비교문학학회 2020 동서 비교문학저널 Vol.0 No.51
Having lived in a completely different space and around the same time, Chuang-tzu and Aristotle expressed the logical writing respectively. The former spoke for the public in a variety of ways that were different from other scholars. The latter summarized what was the logical speech against the Sophists’ arguments. Aristotle’s rhetoric has become an good example of the concept of rhetoric to explain the writing of Chuang-tzu showing that Chuang-tzu’s speech should not be evaluated to be an absurd and bizarre writing which had used various usage of allegory and rhetoric. Although Chuang-tzu’s writing was a full of fantasy and fiction, his writing played a role as logical speech of persuasion by giving logicality by means of evidence, examples, and arrangement.