http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
류재갑 한국전략문제연구소 1999 전략연구 Vol.6 No.1
The main purpose of this study is: (1) to analyze the theory of "defensive defense" or "non - offense defense"in the political, strategic, operational, tactical, and technological level of war: (2) to explore the rationale and feasibility of this notion and theory to specific country and situation; (3) and to clarify the main components of what would presumably constitute a viable defensive defense in the conditions of new military technologies. The notion of "defensive defense" entered academic and political agendas in the course of the 1980s, spurred by, among other things, the increased focus that came to bear on conventional focus in general, and on their offensive capabilities in particular. "Defensive defense" connotes a particular configuration of armed forces intended to make them well adapted for defense, yet unsuitable for offensive purposes. This implies building down offensive capabilities and gradually approaching strictly defensive structure, doctrine, and war plan. Defensive defense is a potential security political instrument on the state level, as well as a military strategy. According to its proponents, defensive defense would provide the solution to the problems of war prevention and disarmament in a post-cold war setting by minimizing the capabilities, as well as the incentives, for waging wars of aggression, and by increasing the margin for unilateral arms builddown, facilitating arms control and disarmament. Therefore defensive defense would be the most significant contributive factor or a precondition for common security, mutual security, or cooperative security. Thus it is highly useful to attempt a critical analysis on the notion of defensive defense in preparing more stable peace and security of the post - cold war era. In this orientation, this study attempt to analyze the notion of "defensive defense" in the condition of new modern military technologies. It includes an analysis on relationship between defensive defense and common security, the implication of defensive defense in achieving the strategic stability, the method of defensive defense in the level of war and the type of service, the structure of defense zone and operation. application to specific country and situation, and clarification of the notion and the solution to such vulnerabilities. This study particularly focuses on the operational level of defensive defense and new technological advantages. From the analysis this study concludes that defensive defense could be applied to new security situation on the basis of mutual acceptance of this notion between conflicting parties. on the political level with regard to war prevention, defensive defense would be contributive to minimizing both incentives for and options of preventive and surprise attack and preemptive attack. With regard to facilitating arms control and disarmament, defensive defense would contribute to eliminating an important factor in the external armaments dynamics, as well as presumably having a benign effect on the internal dynamics. On the strategic and operational level of war, an in-depth dispersed defense system, compared to the "spider-and-web", would be well workable in the condition of limited offensive capability on the strategic level of war, defensive defense constitutes a combination of a forward defense with a territorial defense. The defense based on the disperse system is composed of deliberated limitation of maneuver forces, coordinated retreat of troops, creation of the demilitarized zone, specialization of defense forces, maneuvering of fire power, enhanced utilization of reserve forces, establishment of web or mesh, highly, even simple, technological warning and communication system. On the operational level, an in-depth dispersed defense system (the spider - and - web) would be workable as a operational guideline. On the tactical level, it would enhance elusivenese and survivability. On the technological level, it would be more applicable in terms of favorability of defensive weapons. The defensive defense system would not seek to halt an attack near to the front but to bog down, tie up and eventually halt any advance. The strategy would seek to destroy involving forces in a peacemeal fashion in such a way that attack was channelled and blocked from achieving s? and mobile penetration of the front line. Even though such defensive defense formula has been proposed in European strategic situation, it could be applicable to the specific region or country with some modifications according to political situation as well as geographical feature. In Conclusion, defensive defense implies no lowering of the standards of defense but presumably provides at least undiminished defensive potential yet without any significant offensive capabilities. "The more obviously the defensive capabilities on the both sides suffice to meat any contingency, the more perfect the stability". If offensive forces on both sides outstrip the defense capability of the opponent, no amount of careful balancing can create stability. The adoption by states of a defense approach to security need not lead to an arms race. On the contrary, it can lead to disarmament, and it is probably the only viable approach to it. In a policy based on the balancing of forces, each threatens the other by overinsuring on the basis of a worst-case analysis, thus engendering an arms race. Genuine security and arms restraint can only be based on the notion of preserving peace through forces which are ample in a defensive role but that offensive capability is deliberately reduced to a minimum. However, it has to be acknowledged that it has never been put to the ultimate test. Therefore, although defensive defense is still a theoretical and a proposal we should elaborate the idea in realistic sense for the future peace and arms control talks.