RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Bruner의 내러티브 理論에 기초한 敎育課程 開發 方向 探究 = In Search of Curriculum Development based on Bruner's Narrative Theory

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T13389960

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      In Search of Curriculum Development based on Bruner's Narrative Theory


      Cho, In-sook

      Department of Education
      Graduate School, Kyungpook National University
      Daegu, Korea
      (Supervised by Professor Kang, Hyeon-Suk)


      (Abstract)

      What should schools do to prepare students in a fast-changing world? Schools have been considered as the best way to get a higher position in a society through gaining right knowledge and skills. Due to technological development and various communication media, schools have lost the previous function and faced problems such as school violation, dropouts, defeatism, conflict between teachers and students, broken authority, etc.
      Now schools should be the educational mecca where the nature and purpose of eduction is realized, which means schools should be the place where students learn how to obtain knowledge in their world, manage the knowledge and adapt it to the world, and use it to change the world. Trying to make schools educational mecca requires the changes of not only current school curriculum but national curriculum as well. Schooling is directly influenced by school curriculum that is determined by national curriculum in Korea. Thus it is necessary to review the current development system of national curriculum and examine some problems derived from the system so as to give suggestions on school curriculum development.
      This research adopted Jerome Bruner's narrative theory that would be the basis for the discussion on schooling for students' development. To achieve the ultimate purpose suggesting ways to develop the curriculum for students, this research established research procedures and got the following results.
      Firstly, general concepts of narrative were discussed based on scholars' and researchers’ works that are often cited in educational research works in Korea including Egan(1986), Polkinghorne(1988), Gudmundsdottir(1991), Clandinin & Connelly(1992), Hopkins(1994), Lauritzen & Jaeger(1997), Han(1997), Rankin(2002), Kang(2005), etc. Since they suggested various meanings on narrative from stories to thinking process and communication media, it was required to clarify the concept of narrative so as to connect narrative to curriculum. Even they did not show what properties the stories have, which gave this research an important inquiry task to do.
      Secondly, previous research works that connected narrative to curriculum or teaching-learning process were reviewed and classified into two types. One used narrative to create principles of curriculum design and development, and the other applied narrative to prescribe teaching-learning process. Kang(2004; 2005; 2012), Jeon & Kang(2011), and Conle(2003) belonging to the former suggested reconceptualization of not only content selection and organization but also teaching and learning process in order to solve curriculum problems caused by logical positivism. Kim & Lee(2012), Choi(2008), Egan(1986) and McDrury & Alterio(2003) belonging the latter suggested new teaching-learning models so as to overcome the dominated Tylerian objective model. Lauritzen & Jaeger(1997) belonged to both types, and showed how to use narrative for curriculum development and implementation. These research works, however, did not examine existing curriculum development system nor did they clarify problems of the system in detail before they suggested alternative principles and models.
      Thirdly, Bruner's narrative theory was discussed in the view of meanings, approaches and values. Narrative could be defined as stories with narrative properties, thinking modes for lives and ways to organize cultural toolkits.
      Stories with narrative properties consist of essential elements such as ‘characters’ and ‘plots’ structured by ‘plights,’ While characters act with their own intention, plots start in the state of equilibrium or legitimacy, experience trouble, and finally go back to the original state with norms. Narrative thinking modes for lives specialize in making and understanding illogical, unprovable, and sophisticated lives with emotions. Also they complement paradigmatic modes of thinking with logical and positive features, and give meaning to our lives. Our lives continuously interact with our culture that emerges as cultural toolkit including cultural psychology, folk psychology and daily language. Narrative is the best way to organize and understand culture because culture is life that is organized and understood by narrative.
      Bruner classified various discussions and suggestions on narrative theories into two types-endogenous and plight-modeling approaches. Endogenous approaches suggest that narrative is the inborn ability and plight-modeling approaches focus human intentions, beliefs, values and desires. According to plight-modeling approaches, narrative originates in the culture where interactions with others are done, and cultural plights need forming and examining. Considering purposes and genres of narrative could not exist without culture, plight-modeling approaches were more persuasive than endogenous approaches. Also plight-modeling theories were proved to be closely related to three meanings of narrative discussed above.
      Then educational values derived from narrative were discussed in the aspects of ontology, epistemology and structure of knowledge. Narrative fosters the existence value of educational subjects, promotes knowledge construction and sharing, and strengthens generative quality of structure of knowledge.
      Fourthly, with the reason that schooling is extensively influenced by national curriculum in Korea, the development system of national curriculum and its problems were examined. Existing curriculum development system featured a linear and hierarchical conduit model as a metaphor. Curricula developed by government were passed down to schools via local office of education. The conduit model was seen even in the stage where national curriculum was designed. Researchers who would design national curriculum were selected and controlled by government. Researchers' autonomy was restricted and the deliberation period or process was deficient.
      General disciplines and subject curricula were developed apart, which resulted in the inconsistency between general disciplines and subject curricula and among subject curricula.
      The view on knowledge depended on logical positivism, which allowed Tylerian rationale and model to manage and control overall process of education from the national level to the school and classroom level. In this process teachers were excluded from goal setting, and content selection and organization, to evaluation. Moreover, methods of obtaining knowledge failed for students to get personalized knowledge due to the properties of objective knowledge and behavioral objectives in detail. Students' learning at shcools was alienated from their lives and experience, which made it helpless.
      Fifthly, suggestions on curriculum development system were given based on narrative. The system of national curriculum development must overcome a conduit model and pursue a horizontal model where curriculum researchers who were selected fairly obtain autonomy and join the deliberation process to produce new or revised general disciplines and subject curricula for the improvement of schooling. Alternative perspectives on knowledge should include interpretive constructivism that guarantees learners' independence and autonomy, fosters their critical thinking skills through various problem solving opportunities, and facilitates their experience of cooperation, sharing and reflection. Helping students to convert personalized knowledge into practical knowledge that constructs and changes the world required narrative based curriculum at schools and demanded narrative based development of national curriculum.
      Sixthly, suggestions on common factors of curriculum including educational goals, educational content/experience selection and organization, teaching-learning methods and evaluation were given. Schools must be the place of open forum where students form and develop themselves to prepare for the fast changing world. For this purpose schooling should focus on fostering independent and active learners using flexible narrative modes of thinking and folk pedagogy. Those learners who feel responsible for their own learning actively make and negotiate meaning with others and try to construct personalized and practical knowledge in the open forum. Various opportunities for interaction and problem solving should be provided between teachers and students as well as among students. Also it is recommended to develop computer based program assisting teaching and learning at schools, which enables students to learn what they need whenever and wherever they want. The evaluation in narrative based curriculum focuses on narrative awareness examining how honestly and sincerely they composed and interpreted what they have learned instead of checking fragmented facts.
      Seventhly, a narrative teaching-learning model based on narrative was created and applied to a teaching plan for elementary school students. Teachers who applied the narrative teaching-learning model to their teaching plans could not be excluded from the curriculum as they were in Tylerian model. They should understand personalities of students, prepare not only scripts they explain or demonstrate with goals and standards but also questions or tasks that break the scripts and motivate students to produce narratives through cooperation, sharing and reflection, and make evaluation criteria and checklists for students' expression. Narrative based curricula require teachers' PCK(pedagogical content knowledge) and improve their professionalism.
      In the world we live, we interact with others, understand our lives and make meanings with the help of narrative. Narrative is the useful way we connect ourselves, others and our lives naturally and efficiently, which should be encouraged and facilitated in schooling for students' cognitive and humanistic development.
      번역하기

      In Search of Curriculum Development based on Bruner's Narrative Theory Cho, In-sook Department of Education Graduate School, Kyungpook National University Daegu, Korea (Supervised by Professor Kang, Hyeon-Suk) (Abstract) What shou...

      In Search of Curriculum Development based on Bruner's Narrative Theory


      Cho, In-sook

      Department of Education
      Graduate School, Kyungpook National University
      Daegu, Korea
      (Supervised by Professor Kang, Hyeon-Suk)


      (Abstract)

      What should schools do to prepare students in a fast-changing world? Schools have been considered as the best way to get a higher position in a society through gaining right knowledge and skills. Due to technological development and various communication media, schools have lost the previous function and faced problems such as school violation, dropouts, defeatism, conflict between teachers and students, broken authority, etc.
      Now schools should be the educational mecca where the nature and purpose of eduction is realized, which means schools should be the place where students learn how to obtain knowledge in their world, manage the knowledge and adapt it to the world, and use it to change the world. Trying to make schools educational mecca requires the changes of not only current school curriculum but national curriculum as well. Schooling is directly influenced by school curriculum that is determined by national curriculum in Korea. Thus it is necessary to review the current development system of national curriculum and examine some problems derived from the system so as to give suggestions on school curriculum development.
      This research adopted Jerome Bruner's narrative theory that would be the basis for the discussion on schooling for students' development. To achieve the ultimate purpose suggesting ways to develop the curriculum for students, this research established research procedures and got the following results.
      Firstly, general concepts of narrative were discussed based on scholars' and researchers’ works that are often cited in educational research works in Korea including Egan(1986), Polkinghorne(1988), Gudmundsdottir(1991), Clandinin & Connelly(1992), Hopkins(1994), Lauritzen & Jaeger(1997), Han(1997), Rankin(2002), Kang(2005), etc. Since they suggested various meanings on narrative from stories to thinking process and communication media, it was required to clarify the concept of narrative so as to connect narrative to curriculum. Even they did not show what properties the stories have, which gave this research an important inquiry task to do.
      Secondly, previous research works that connected narrative to curriculum or teaching-learning process were reviewed and classified into two types. One used narrative to create principles of curriculum design and development, and the other applied narrative to prescribe teaching-learning process. Kang(2004; 2005; 2012), Jeon & Kang(2011), and Conle(2003) belonging to the former suggested reconceptualization of not only content selection and organization but also teaching and learning process in order to solve curriculum problems caused by logical positivism. Kim & Lee(2012), Choi(2008), Egan(1986) and McDrury & Alterio(2003) belonging the latter suggested new teaching-learning models so as to overcome the dominated Tylerian objective model. Lauritzen & Jaeger(1997) belonged to both types, and showed how to use narrative for curriculum development and implementation. These research works, however, did not examine existing curriculum development system nor did they clarify problems of the system in detail before they suggested alternative principles and models.
      Thirdly, Bruner's narrative theory was discussed in the view of meanings, approaches and values. Narrative could be defined as stories with narrative properties, thinking modes for lives and ways to organize cultural toolkits.
      Stories with narrative properties consist of essential elements such as ‘characters’ and ‘plots’ structured by ‘plights,’ While characters act with their own intention, plots start in the state of equilibrium or legitimacy, experience trouble, and finally go back to the original state with norms. Narrative thinking modes for lives specialize in making and understanding illogical, unprovable, and sophisticated lives with emotions. Also they complement paradigmatic modes of thinking with logical and positive features, and give meaning to our lives. Our lives continuously interact with our culture that emerges as cultural toolkit including cultural psychology, folk psychology and daily language. Narrative is the best way to organize and understand culture because culture is life that is organized and understood by narrative.
      Bruner classified various discussions and suggestions on narrative theories into two types-endogenous and plight-modeling approaches. Endogenous approaches suggest that narrative is the inborn ability and plight-modeling approaches focus human intentions, beliefs, values and desires. According to plight-modeling approaches, narrative originates in the culture where interactions with others are done, and cultural plights need forming and examining. Considering purposes and genres of narrative could not exist without culture, plight-modeling approaches were more persuasive than endogenous approaches. Also plight-modeling theories were proved to be closely related to three meanings of narrative discussed above.
      Then educational values derived from narrative were discussed in the aspects of ontology, epistemology and structure of knowledge. Narrative fosters the existence value of educational subjects, promotes knowledge construction and sharing, and strengthens generative quality of structure of knowledge.
      Fourthly, with the reason that schooling is extensively influenced by national curriculum in Korea, the development system of national curriculum and its problems were examined. Existing curriculum development system featured a linear and hierarchical conduit model as a metaphor. Curricula developed by government were passed down to schools via local office of education. The conduit model was seen even in the stage where national curriculum was designed. Researchers who would design national curriculum were selected and controlled by government. Researchers' autonomy was restricted and the deliberation period or process was deficient.
      General disciplines and subject curricula were developed apart, which resulted in the inconsistency between general disciplines and subject curricula and among subject curricula.
      The view on knowledge depended on logical positivism, which allowed Tylerian rationale and model to manage and control overall process of education from the national level to the school and classroom level. In this process teachers were excluded from goal setting, and content selection and organization, to evaluation. Moreover, methods of obtaining knowledge failed for students to get personalized knowledge due to the properties of objective knowledge and behavioral objectives in detail. Students' learning at shcools was alienated from their lives and experience, which made it helpless.
      Fifthly, suggestions on curriculum development system were given based on narrative. The system of national curriculum development must overcome a conduit model and pursue a horizontal model where curriculum researchers who were selected fairly obtain autonomy and join the deliberation process to produce new or revised general disciplines and subject curricula for the improvement of schooling. Alternative perspectives on knowledge should include interpretive constructivism that guarantees learners' independence and autonomy, fosters their critical thinking skills through various problem solving opportunities, and facilitates their experience of cooperation, sharing and reflection. Helping students to convert personalized knowledge into practical knowledge that constructs and changes the world required narrative based curriculum at schools and demanded narrative based development of national curriculum.
      Sixthly, suggestions on common factors of curriculum including educational goals, educational content/experience selection and organization, teaching-learning methods and evaluation were given. Schools must be the place of open forum where students form and develop themselves to prepare for the fast changing world. For this purpose schooling should focus on fostering independent and active learners using flexible narrative modes of thinking and folk pedagogy. Those learners who feel responsible for their own learning actively make and negotiate meaning with others and try to construct personalized and practical knowledge in the open forum. Various opportunities for interaction and problem solving should be provided between teachers and students as well as among students. Also it is recommended to develop computer based program assisting teaching and learning at schools, which enables students to learn what they need whenever and wherever they want. The evaluation in narrative based curriculum focuses on narrative awareness examining how honestly and sincerely they composed and interpreted what they have learned instead of checking fragmented facts.
      Seventhly, a narrative teaching-learning model based on narrative was created and applied to a teaching plan for elementary school students. Teachers who applied the narrative teaching-learning model to their teaching plans could not be excluded from the curriculum as they were in Tylerian model. They should understand personalities of students, prepare not only scripts they explain or demonstrate with goals and standards but also questions or tasks that break the scripts and motivate students to produce narratives through cooperation, sharing and reflection, and make evaluation criteria and checklists for students' expression. Narrative based curricula require teachers' PCK(pedagogical content knowledge) and improve their professionalism.
      In the world we live, we interact with others, understand our lives and make meanings with the help of narrative. Narrative is the useful way we connect ourselves, others and our lives naturally and efficiently, which should be encouraged and facilitated in schooling for students' cognitive and humanistic development.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 차 례
      • Ⅰ. 서론 1
      • 1. 연구의 필요성과 목적 1
      • 2. 연구 내용과 방법 6
      • 차 례
      • Ⅰ. 서론 1
      • 1. 연구의 필요성과 목적 1
      • 2. 연구 내용과 방법 6
      • 3. 선행 연구의 검토 8
      • Ⅱ. Bruner의 내러티브 이론 17
      • 1. 내러티브의 세 가지 의미 17
      • 2. 내생적 접근법과 입장 모형화 접근법 46
      • 3. 내러티브 이론의 특징 54
      • 4. 내러티브의 교육적 가치 61
      • Ⅲ. 현행 교육과정의 개발 방식과 문제 72
      • 1. 현행 교육과정의 개발 방식 72
      • 2. 하향식 도관모형 체제 81
      • 3. 실증주의 인식론 87
      • 4. 새로운 교육과정 개발의 근거 99
      • Ⅳ. 내러티브 이론에 기초한 교육과정 개발 방향 102
      • 1. 교육과정 개발 체제와 인식론의 변화 102
      • 2. 교육과정 공통요소별 개발 방향 109
      • 3. 내러티브 교수-학습 모형의 구안과 적용 128
      • 4. 비판적 논의 142
      • Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언 146
      • 1. 요약 및 결론 146
      • 2. 제언 151
      • 참고문헌 156
      • Abstract 174
      • 표 목 차
      • <표 I-1> 내러티브의 다양한 정의 11
      • <표 II-1> 내러티브 실재의 보편성 29
      • <표 III-1> 교육과정개발 평가의 준거 80
      • <표 IV-1> 6학년 영어 교과 단원 지도 계획(교사용 지침서) 135
      • <표 IV-2> 내러티브 교수-학습 모형을 적용한 단원 지도 계획 137
      • <표 IV-3> 교수-학습에서 증가되어야 하는 것 139
      • 그 림 목 차
      • [그림 II-1] 내러티브 개념 모형 45
      • [그림 II-2] 내러티브 이론 모형 55
      • [그림 IV-1] 내러티브 수평모형 103
      • [그림 IV-2] 수평모형에 따른 교육과정 개발 체제 104
      • [그림 IV-3] 내러티브 교수-학습 모형 129
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1. After Virtue, McIntyre, After virtue, , 1981

      2. Beyond Culture, Trilling, Beyond Culture, , 1965

      3. Making Stories, Bruner. Jerome, , 2003

      4. Acts of meaning, Bruner, Jerome S, Harvard University Press, , 1990

      5. Minding the law, Amsterdam, Anthony G, Harvard University Press, , 2000

      6. The kite runner, Hosseini, Khaled, Riverhead Books, , 2003

      7. 사회언어학, 탁순자, 계명대학교 국제학대학원, 서울: 민음사, , 2006

      8. Realms of meaning, Phenix, , 1964

      9. Personal knowledge, Polanyi, Michael, Harper & Row, Personal knowledge, , 1964

      10. Styles of learning, Entwistle, , 1988

      1. After Virtue, McIntyre, After virtue, , 1981

      2. Beyond Culture, Trilling, Beyond Culture, , 1965

      3. Making Stories, Bruner. Jerome, , 2003

      4. Acts of meaning, Bruner, Jerome S, Harvard University Press, , 1990

      5. Minding the law, Amsterdam, Anthony G, Harvard University Press, , 2000

      6. The kite runner, Hosseini, Khaled, Riverhead Books, , 2003

      7. 사회언어학, 탁순자, 계명대학교 국제학대학원, 서울: 민음사, , 2006

      8. Realms of meaning, Phenix, , 1964

      9. Personal knowledge, Polanyi, Michael, Harper & Row, Personal knowledge, , 1964

      10. Styles of learning, Entwistle, , 1988

      11. 민요시학연구, 좌혜경, , 1996

      12. Aristotle's poetics, Halliwell, Stephen, Duckworth, , 1986

      13. Education and power, Apple, Michael W, Routledge, , 1995

      14. The concept of mind, Ryle, Gilbert, Penguin Books, The concept of mind, , 1973

      15. 敎科의 內面化, 이홍우, 서울대학교교육연구소, "아시아교육연구, , 2000

      16. Essays and aphorisms, Schopenhauer, , 1973

      17. Ethics and education, Peters, R. S, Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, , 2015

      18. Narrative psychology, Sarbin, , 1986

      19. 2012 청소년 통계, 통계청, , 2012

      20. Philosophy and living, Blumenau, , 2013

      21. Kant와 교육인식론, 노철현, , 2010

      22. Understanding by design, Wiggins, Grant P., Merrill/Prentice Hall, , 2001

      23. Teaching as Storytelling, Egan, , 1986

      24. The process of education, Bruner, Jerome S, Vintage Books, The process of education, , 1960

      25. Theeducationalimagination, Eisner, , 1974

      26. 미군정과 교육정책, 손인수, , 1992

      27. 어린이 영어지도사, 조인숙, 한국문화사, , 2009

      28. The relevance of education, Bruner, Jerome S, Penguin Education, The relevance of education, , 1974

      29. 현대 교육과정 탐구, 강현석, 학지사, , 2011

      30. Forms of Curriculum Inquiry, Short, , 1991

      31. 열하일기. 김혈조 역, 박지원, , 2012

      32. 제7차 교육과정 백서, 교육인적자원부, , 2004

      33. 제7차 교육과정 총론, 교육부, , 1997

      34. Form and meaning in language, Fillmore, Charles J, CSLI Publications, Center for the study of language and Information, , 2003

      35. The Education of Little Tree, Carter, Forrest, University of New Mexico Press, , 2002

      36. Actual minds, possible worlds, Bruner, Jerome S, Harvard University Press, "Actual minds, , 1986

      37. Mythologies. 현대의 신화, Barthes, , 1957

      38. Storytelling in organizations, Gabriel, , 2000

      39. 2009 개정교육과정 총론, 교육과학기술부, , 2009

      40. Curriculum implementation In P, Zumbalt, Bolin, Snyder, , 1992

      41. Existentialism: Basic Writings, Guignon, , 1995

      42. The poetics. (M. Heath, Trans), Aristotle, "The poetics. (M. Heath, , 1997

      43. Toward a theory of instruction, Bruner, Jerome S, Belknap Press, Toward a theory of Instruction, , 1966

      44. 경어법과 국어교육 연구, 서덕현, 국학자료원, , 1996

      45. 수행평가의 이론과 실제, 국립교육평가원, 국립교육평가원, , 1996

      46. An anatomy of narrative curricula, Conle, C, Conle, , 2003

      47. Thomas Aquinas: Selected writings, Mclnerny, , 1999

      48. Preparing instructional objectives, Mager, Robert F., Tower Press, , 1978

      49. Principles of instructional design, Gagne, Robert Mills, Thomson/Wadsworth, , 2005

      50. Pythagoras: His Life and Teachings, Stanley, , 2010

      51. The process of education revisited, Bruner, , 1971

      52. On knowing:essays for the left hand, Bruner, Jerome S, Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press, On knowing: Essays for the left hand, , 1979

      53. School-based curriculum development, Skilbeck, Malcolm, Harper & Row, , 1984

      54. 현대 교육과정과 교육평가, 강현석, 학지사, 현대 교육과정과 교육평가, , 2005

      55. Curriculum: Principles and foundation, Zais, Curriculum: Principles and Foundation, , 1976

      56. The politics. (T. A. Sinclair, Trans), Aristotle, "The politics. (T. A. Sinclair, , 1962

      57. 질적연구방법론 . 1 , Bricoleur, 김영천, 아카데미프레스, 질적연구 방법론 1: Bricoleur, , 2012

      58. 한국 교육, 어디로 가야 하나, 정범모, 푸른역사, "한국교육, , 2010

      59. A Post-modern perspective on curriculum, Doll, William E, Teachers College Press, , 1993

      60. Jerome Bruner : language, culture, self, Bakhurst, David, SAGE, "Jerome Bruner: Language, , 2001

      61. Narrative knowing and the human science, Polkinghorne,D, , 1988

      62. Transactional analysis in psychotherapy, Berne, Eric, Ballatine books, Transactional analysis in psychotherapy, , 1974

      63. The pleasure of text. (R. Miller, Trans), Barthes, "The pleasure of text. (R. Miller, , 1975

      64. Culture and Human Development: A New Look, Bruner, Culture and human development: A new look, , 1990

      65. In search of mind: Essays in autobiography, Bruner, J. S., Bruner, , 1983

      66. The semiotic challenge. (R. Howard, Trans), Barthes, "The semiotic challenge. (R. Howard, , 1988

      67. Definitions and Models in curriculum theory, Johnson, Definitions and models in curriculum theory, , 1967

      68. Developing a curriculum : a practical guide, Nicholls, Audrey, Allen and Unwin, , 1972

      69. Reflections of a Developmental Psychologist, Bruner, , 2008

      70. 교육과정 개발의 평가 준거 탐색, 김재복, 경인교육대학교 초등교육연구원, "경인교육대학교 교육 논총, , 2007

      71. 내러티브 사고양식의 교육적 의미, 한승희, 한국교육과정학회, "교육과정연구, , 1997

      72. 내러티브의 교육과정적 의미 탐색, 이흔정, 안암교육학회, "한국교육학연구, , 2004

      73. 한훤당 김굉필의 교육사상 재검토, 박균섭 ( Kyoon Seop Park ), 경북대학교 영남문화연구원, , 2012

      74. Basic principles of curriculum and instruction, Tyler, Ralph W, Chicago University Press, , 1971

      75. A naturalistic model for curriculum development, Walker, , 1971

      76. Philosophische Untersuchungen. 철학적 탐구, Wittgenstein, , 1953

      77. 교육학의 새로운 지표로서 내러티브, 한승희, 한국교육학회, "교육학연구, , 2000

      78. Condillac: Essay on the origin of human knowledge, Aarsleff, , 2001

      79. Du texte ? l'action, 텍스트에서 행동으로, 박병수, Ricoeur, 남기영, , 1986

      80. Kritik der reinen Vernunft. 「순수이성비판, Kant, 최재희,

      81. Teacher thinking : a study of practical knowledge, Elbaz, Freema, Croom Helm, Teacher thinking: A study of practical knowledge, , 1983

      82. Currere:Towardreconceptualization.InJ.Jelinek(Ed.), Pinar, Currere: Toward reconceptualization. In J. Jelinek (Ed.), , 1974

      83. 한국인의 심리특성. 한국심리학회(편), 최상진, , 1997

      84. After Tyler: 교육과정 이론화 1970년-2000년, 김영천, After Tyler: 교육과정이론화 1970년-2000년, , 2007

      85. Reflection in Learning and Professional Development, Moon,J, , 1997

      86. 2009 개정 교육과정: 개정의 방향과 총론, 2009개정교육과정연구위원회, , 2009

      87. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. 덕의 상실, 이진우, MacIntyre, After virtue: A study in moral theory. 덕의 상실, , 1997

      88. Die Deshichte von Herrn Sommer. 좀머 씨 이야기, S?skind, , 1991

      89. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. 논리-철학 논고, 이영철, Wittgenstein, , 2006

      90. 내러티브 교육과정의 적용에 대한 연구, 이흔정, 고려대학교 대학원, 고려대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문, , 2004

      91. Introduction to the Structural Analysis of Narratives, Barthes, Introduction to the structural analysis of narratives, , 1975

      92. 교사의 실천적 지식에 대한 이론적 탐색, 김자영, 김정효, 한국교원교육학회, "한국교원교육연구, , 2003

      93. Imitation and mimesis. In S. Hurley & N. Chater (Eds.), Donald, , 2005

      94. Time and narrative. trans. K. Mclaughlin & D. Pellauer, Ricoeur, , 1984

      95. 미래형 교육과정 방향 및 실행 체제 연구, 김경자, 강현석, 곽병선, 박순경, 김재춘, 홍후조, 소경희, , 2009

      96. Thedevelopmentofcohesion inchildren's retold narratives, John-Steiner, Panofsky, , 1987

      97. A categorization scheme principles of sequencing content, Strike, Posner, , 1976

      98. Teachers as curriculum planners: Narrative of experience, Clandinin, Connelly, , 1988

      99. Bruner의 교육이론과 영재교육의 현대적 접목, 조인숙(In-Sook Jo), 강현석 ( Hyeon Suk Kang ), 인하대학교 교육연구소, , 2013

      100. 내러티브에 기반한 교육과정 설계 원리 탐구, 강현석, 한국교육철학회, "교육철학, , 2012

      101. Interpretation theory : discourse and the surplus of meaning, Ricoeur, Paul, Texas Christian University Press, , 1976

      102. Personalpracticalknowledge:A studyofteacher'sclassroom image, Clandinin,D.J, Clandinin, Personal practical knowledge: A study of teacher's classroom image, , 1985

      103. Stories to live by: Narrative understanding of school reform, Connelly, Clandinin, , 1998

      104. Understanding narratives: A review of story grammar research, Gee, Olson, , 1998

      105. Cultural communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives, Wertsch, , 1985

      106. Using story: In higher education and professional development, Moon, , 2010

      107. Homo Narrans : the poetics and anthropology of oral literature, Niles, John D, University of Pennsylvania Press, , 1999

      108. 브루너의 내러티브 이론의 특징과 시사점 탐구, 강현석, 조인숙, , 2013

      109. 2009 개정 교육과정 (총론)의 가능성과 한계 탐색, 김재춘 ( Chae Chun Gim ), 한국교육과정학회, , 2010

      110. 2009개정 교육과정의 문제점 및 음악교육의 위기, 민경훈(Kyung Hoon Min), 한국음악교육학회, , 2009

      111. Child of conflict : the Korean American relationship, 1943-1953, Cumings, Bruce, University of Washington Press, "Child of conflict: the Korean-American relationship, , 1983

      112. Mind in society:The development of higher psychological process, Vygotsky,L.S., Mind in society: The development of higher psychological process, , 1978

      113. Narrative and paradigmatic modes of thought. In E. Eisner (Ed.), Bruner, , 1985

      114. Quantifying productive language discours. In J. F. Miller (Ed.), Miller, , 1991

      115. The educated mind : how cognitive tools shape our understanding, Egan, Kieran, University of Chicago Press, , 1997

      116. The reflective practitioner : how professionals think in action, Schon, Donald A, Basic Books, , 1983

      117. Inquiry and reflection : framing narrative practice in education, Brunner, Diane DuBose, State University of New York Press, , 1994

      118. Narrative inquiry : experience and story in qualitative research, Clandinin, D. Jean, Jossey-Bass, Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in Qualitative Research, , 2000

      119. 2009 개정 교육과정’ 정책 추진 과정과 쟁점 분석, 김동원, , 2010

      120. Individualism and holism : studies in Confucian and Taoist values, Munro, Donald J, Center for Chinese Studies, University of Michigan, , 1985

      121. You know what?” Conversational narratives of preschool children, Stone, You know What? Conversational narratives of preschool children, , 1992

      122. 이명박 정부의 교육과정 정책의 평가 및 개선방향, 오기성, 한국평화통일학회, "평화학연구, , 2012

      123. 한국 국가 수준 교육과정의 개정 방식과 개선 방향, 김두정, , 2006

      124. Liberal education and the nature of knowledge. In R. S. Peters (Ed.), Hirst, , 1965

      125. Educational objectives: Help or hinderance. School Review, 75, 250-260, Eisner, "Educational objectives: Help or hinderance. School Review, , 1967

      126. Democracy and education : an introduction to the philosophy of education, Dewey, John, Thoemmes Press, Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education, , 2002

      127. Self-narrative in the life course: A contextual pproach. In M. Bamberg(Ed.), Hermans, , 1997

      128. The feeling of what happens; Body and emotion in themaking of consciousness, Damasio, Antonio, Damasio, The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness, , 2000

      129. 지식구조론의 재구성을 통한 교육과정 설계 원리의 구성, 강현석, 한국교육과정학회, "교육과정연구, , 2004

      130. 2009 개정 고등학교 교육과정의 편성·운영 실태 분석 연구, 한혜정, 백경선, 민용성, , 2011

      131. Discourse on method and meditations on first philosophy. (D. A. Cress, Trans), Descartes, "Discourse on method and meditations on first philosophy. (D. A. Cress, , 1999

      132. The one world schoolhouse: Education reimagined. 나는 공짜로 공부한다, Khan, , 2012

      133. 브루너의 내러티브 이론에 따른 교육과정 개발 방향의 탐색, 강현석 ( Hyeon Suk Kang ), 조인숙 ( In Sook Cho ), 한국초등교육학회,

      134. 선택 ‘주체’ 위주의 선택 교육과정 설계의 문제점과 과제, 홍후조, , 2002

      135. 제7차 교육과정 시행에 따른 교육인적자원부의 입장과 대책, 교육인적자원부, , 2001

      136. The geography of thought : how Asians and Westerners think differently-- and why, Nisbett, Richard E, Free Press, The geography of thought: How Asians and westerners think differently and why, , 2004

      137. 현행 교육과정의 분석평가 연구- 제6차 교육과정을 중심으로, 교육과정 개정 연구위원회, 교육과정 개정 연구위원회, , 1996

      138. 지식기반사회에서의 학교 교육과정 구성을 위한 기초 연구(II), 소경희, 이화진, , 2001

      139. The Narrative Nature of pedagogical Content Knowledge. In H. McEwan & K. Egan (Eds.), Gudmunsdottir, , 1995

      140. The story of philosophy: The lives and opinions of the world's greatest philosophers, Durant, , 1991

      141. The value of narrativity in the representation of reality. In W. J. T. Mitchell (Ed.), White, , 1981

      142. 광복 이후 우리나라 교육과정 개발 체제의 변천과정에 대한 분석, 박채형, 한국교육과정학회, "교육과정연구, , 2005

      143. 「초등학교의 새로운 평가제도에 따른 수행평가의 이론과 실제」, 국립교육평가원, 초등학교의 새로운 평가제도에 따른 수행평가의 이론과 실제, , 1996

      144. 내러티브를 통한 교육과정 개발자로서의 교사 전문성의 재개념화, 강현석, 한국교육과정학회, "교육과정연구, , 2006

      145. 주기적 일시적, 전면적 교육과정 개정 방식: 기능과 존속의 조건, 김 용, 한국교육과정학회, "주기적, , 2002

      146. On the narrative method, personal philosophy and narrative units in the story of teaching, Clandinin, Connelly, "On the narrative method, , 1986

      147. Personal statement. In W. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualists (89-93), Apple, "Personal statement. In W. Pinar (Ed.), , 1975

      148. The origins of the Korean war: liberation and the emergence of separate regimes, 1945-1947, Cumings, "The origins of the Korean war: liberation and the emergence of separate regimes, , 1981

      149. Politics and theories in the history of curricular reform in South Korea. In W. Pinar (Ed.), Lee, , 2003

      150. Bruner의 내러티브 논의에 기초한 교육문화학의 장르에 관한 학제적 연구, 강현석, , 2008

      151. Recent research on student learning and the learning environment. In J. Tait & P. Knight (Eds.), Entwistle, , 1996

      152. Technology meets constructivism: Do they make a marriage? In T. M. Duffy & D. H. Jonassen (Eds.), Perkins, , 1992

      153. Bruner의 교육과정 이론에서 지식의 재해석: 지식의 구조와 내러티브의 관계, 강현석, , 2009

      154. Bruner의 교육과정 이론에서의 지식의 문제: 지식의 구조와 내러티브의 관계, 강현석, , 2006

      155. Short courses and workshops: Improving the IMPACT of learning, training and professional development, Moon, "Short courses and workshops: Improving the IMPACT of learning, , 2001

      156. The cave and the light : Plato versus Aristotle and the struggle for the soul of Western civilization, Herman, Arthur, Randome House, , 2013

      157. Learning through storytelling in higher education: Using reflection and experience to improve learning, McDrury, Alterio, , 2003

      158. First and second generation conflict in education of the Asian American community (Doctoral dissertation), Kim, , 2008

      159. School literacy, reasoning, and civility: An anthropologist's perspective. Review of Educational Research, Erickson, "School literacy, , 1984

      160. 현행 국가 교육과정체제의 문제점과 대안의 모색-미국과 영국의 사례를 중심으로, 김영석, , 2006

      161. RetellingStories:A StrategyforimprovingYoungChildren'sComprehension,ConceptofStoryStructureandOralLanguageComplexity, Morrow, "Retelling stories: A strategy for improving young children's comprehension, , 1985

      162. 합리주의적 교육과정 체제에서 배제된 내러티브 교육과정의 가능성과 교과목 개발의 방향 탐색, 강현석, 한국교육과정학회, "교육과정연구, , 2005

      163. Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self: Self- enhancement in the United States and self-depreciation in Japan, Kitayama, S., , 1997

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼