RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      팀 特性과 팀 有效性의 관계에서 팀 信頼의 媒介效果 및 팀 效能感의 調節效果 分析 = Analysing mediating effect of team trust and moderating effect of team efficacy in the relationship between team characteristics and team effectiveness

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T13317139

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        대전 : 忠南大學校, 2013

      • 학위논문사항
      • 발행연도

        2013

      • 작성언어

        한국어

      • KDC

        325.2 판사항(5)

      • DDC

        658.402 판사항(21)

      • 발행국(도시)

        대전

      • 형태사항

        vii, 170 p. ; 26 cm

      • 일반주기명

        권말부록: 설문지
        참고문헌: p. 134-157

      • 소장기관
        • 국립중앙도서관 국립중앙도서관 우편복사 서비스
        • 충남대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      국문 초록 (Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      본 연구는 팀 성과를 결정함에 있어 팀 신뢰가 매우 중요하다는 전제위에서 팀 신뢰에 영향을 미치는 팀 특성의 선행요인(antecedents)과 팀 유효성의 결과요인(outcomes)을 실증연구를 통해 구명하고자 한다. 보다 구체적으로 본 연구는 다음과 같은 목적을 지닌다.
      첫째, 기존 연구들을 중심으로 팀 신뢰의 개념을 정립하고 이의 구성차원을 확정한다.
      둘째, 팀 신뢰에 영향을 미치는 팀 특성의 선행요인으로 팀 감성지능, 임파워링 리더십, 공정성 풍토를 설정하고 이들이 팀 신뢰와 가지는 관계를 실증적으로 구명한다.
      셋째, 팀 신뢰가 팀 유효성의 결과요인인 팀 성과와 팀 몰입을 설정하고 그 관계들을 실증적으로 조사한다.
      넷째, 팀 신뢰가 팀 유효성의 결과변수인 팀 성과 및 팀 몰입과 가지는 관계에서 팀 효능감을 조절요인으로 설정하고 그 조절효과를 실증적으로 구명한다.
      이러한 모형설정과 검증을 통해 본 연구에서는 팀 이론의 발전에 기여하고 팀 관리를 위한 관리적 시사점을 도출하고자 한다.
      본 연구는 팀 특성의 선행변수로는 이론적 연구에 기초하여 팀 감성지능, 임파워링 리더십, 공정성 풍토를 설정하였다. 이 세 변수가 선정된 배경은 팀 신뢰라는 행위에 영향을 미치는 선행요인으로 사람요인과 환경요인이 있을 수 있다는 근거에서이다. 사람요인에 해당하는 요인으로는 팀 감성지능을 선정하였고, 환경요인으로는 임파워링 이라는 리더십 요인과 공정성 풍토라는 조직풍토 요인을 설정하였다.
      본 연구에서 검증된 연구 결과들을 요약하면 다음과 같다.
      첫째, 팀 특성의 선행변수로 예측 설정한 팀 감성지능 , 임파워링 리더십, 공정성풍토는 팀 신뢰에 정(+)의 영향을 미친다. 둘째, 그로인한 팀 신뢰는 팀 유효성인 결과변수인 팀 성과와, 팀 몰입에 정(+) 영향을 미친다. 셋째, 매개변수인 팀 구성원의 팀 신뢰는 선행변수인 팀 감성지능, 임파워링 리더십, 공정성풍토와 결과변수인 팀 성과, 팀 몰입사이에 매개효과를 가진다. 넷째, 팀 구성원의 팀 효능감은 주 변수(매개변수)인 팀 신뢰와 팀 유효성의 결과변수인 팀 성과, 팀 몰입사이에 조절효과가 없다.
      결과적으로 조직 내 팀 구성원을 대상으로 한 본 연구는 조직 내 구성원의 심리상태 및 태도를 연구하였으며 조직 내에서 팀 행위적 성과(behavioral performance)인 팀 성과와 팀 몰입을 향상 시킬 수 있는 방안은 조직 내 팀 구성원의 감성지능관리, 팀 리더의 리더십 중 내외부적 환경변화로 인한 조직구조의 유연성을 고려한 임파워링 리더십과, 조직 내 팀 구성원들의 업무 수행에 따른 공정성풍토가 일관성 있게 공유 할 수 있는 방안을 모색하여야 하며, 팀 성과를 극대화 시킬 수 있는 조절요인을 발굴하여 팀 신뢰와 팀 성과, 팀 몰입과의 관계에서 보다 효율적인 성과를 창출 할 수 있는 방안 강구를 필요로 함을 피력 하며 결론을 맺는다.
      번역하기

      본 연구는 팀 성과를 결정함에 있어 팀 신뢰가 매우 중요하다는 전제위에서 팀 신뢰에 영향을 미치는 팀 특성의 선행요인(antecedents)과 팀 유효성의 결과요인(outcomes)을 실증연구를 통해 구명...

      본 연구는 팀 성과를 결정함에 있어 팀 신뢰가 매우 중요하다는 전제위에서 팀 신뢰에 영향을 미치는 팀 특성의 선행요인(antecedents)과 팀 유효성의 결과요인(outcomes)을 실증연구를 통해 구명하고자 한다. 보다 구체적으로 본 연구는 다음과 같은 목적을 지닌다.
      첫째, 기존 연구들을 중심으로 팀 신뢰의 개념을 정립하고 이의 구성차원을 확정한다.
      둘째, 팀 신뢰에 영향을 미치는 팀 특성의 선행요인으로 팀 감성지능, 임파워링 리더십, 공정성 풍토를 설정하고 이들이 팀 신뢰와 가지는 관계를 실증적으로 구명한다.
      셋째, 팀 신뢰가 팀 유효성의 결과요인인 팀 성과와 팀 몰입을 설정하고 그 관계들을 실증적으로 조사한다.
      넷째, 팀 신뢰가 팀 유효성의 결과변수인 팀 성과 및 팀 몰입과 가지는 관계에서 팀 효능감을 조절요인으로 설정하고 그 조절효과를 실증적으로 구명한다.
      이러한 모형설정과 검증을 통해 본 연구에서는 팀 이론의 발전에 기여하고 팀 관리를 위한 관리적 시사점을 도출하고자 한다.
      본 연구는 팀 특성의 선행변수로는 이론적 연구에 기초하여 팀 감성지능, 임파워링 리더십, 공정성 풍토를 설정하였다. 이 세 변수가 선정된 배경은 팀 신뢰라는 행위에 영향을 미치는 선행요인으로 사람요인과 환경요인이 있을 수 있다는 근거에서이다. 사람요인에 해당하는 요인으로는 팀 감성지능을 선정하였고, 환경요인으로는 임파워링 이라는 리더십 요인과 공정성 풍토라는 조직풍토 요인을 설정하였다.
      본 연구에서 검증된 연구 결과들을 요약하면 다음과 같다.
      첫째, 팀 특성의 선행변수로 예측 설정한 팀 감성지능 , 임파워링 리더십, 공정성풍토는 팀 신뢰에 정(+)의 영향을 미친다. 둘째, 그로인한 팀 신뢰는 팀 유효성인 결과변수인 팀 성과와, 팀 몰입에 정(+) 영향을 미친다. 셋째, 매개변수인 팀 구성원의 팀 신뢰는 선행변수인 팀 감성지능, 임파워링 리더십, 공정성풍토와 결과변수인 팀 성과, 팀 몰입사이에 매개효과를 가진다. 넷째, 팀 구성원의 팀 효능감은 주 변수(매개변수)인 팀 신뢰와 팀 유효성의 결과변수인 팀 성과, 팀 몰입사이에 조절효과가 없다.
      결과적으로 조직 내 팀 구성원을 대상으로 한 본 연구는 조직 내 구성원의 심리상태 및 태도를 연구하였으며 조직 내에서 팀 행위적 성과(behavioral performance)인 팀 성과와 팀 몰입을 향상 시킬 수 있는 방안은 조직 내 팀 구성원의 감성지능관리, 팀 리더의 리더십 중 내외부적 환경변화로 인한 조직구조의 유연성을 고려한 임파워링 리더십과, 조직 내 팀 구성원들의 업무 수행에 따른 공정성풍토가 일관성 있게 공유 할 수 있는 방안을 모색하여야 하며, 팀 성과를 극대화 시킬 수 있는 조절요인을 발굴하여 팀 신뢰와 팀 성과, 팀 몰입과의 관계에서 보다 효율적인 성과를 창출 할 수 있는 방안 강구를 필요로 함을 피력 하며 결론을 맺는다.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      With advancement of information and communication and with acceleration of globalization, the organizational environment is becoming more complex and becoming more uncertain.
      As an organizational strategy to meet with these environmental changes, organizations are flattening their structures and adopting team systems. It is a measure to respond to the environment more actively and more promptly. The heightened needs of members for flat organization culture also have played a role for this expansion of team systems.
      However, despite the active adoption of team systems in the practical business world, the academic interest and practical studies on team systems have not developed broadly. A partial reason for this would be that studies on teams are relatively more burdensome and methodologically more complex compared to studies on individuals.
      A remarkable study among not that numerous team studies is about team trust. Team trust refers to the degree of trust among team members. Just as trusting the organization or supervisors in individual behaviors influences significantly on job satisfaction of team members and organization activities, team trust is assessed as an essential factor having major influence on the team performance.
      However, despite the importance of team trust in the practical world, there have been few studies which deal with development of the concept and criteria of team trust and also few empirical studies on the antecedents and outcomes of team trust.
      Therefore, based on the premise that team trust is very important in determining team performance, this study attempts to identify antecedents of team characteristics and outcomes of team effectiveness which influence team trust by conducting a empirical research.
      Based on literature and theoretical research, this study set antecedent variables of team characteristics as team emotional intelligence, empowering leadership, and justice climates. For the outcome variable of team effectiveness, the study set as team performance and team engagement. Besides, the study set team trust as a mediating variable in the influence process of antecedents on outcomes. Lastly, in the influence process of team trust on team performance and team engagement, which are the team effectiveness, the study set team efficacy as moderating variable and conducted empirical research on this.
      Methodologically, the study conducted team-based study instead of individual based study. For the variables of the research, the study carried out questionnaire research in a self-report format. Throughout the process from distribution to the collection of the questionnaire, the researcher met respondents face to face to make them understand the importance of the study. In order to reduce common method bias, which is a weakness of self-reported questionnaire research, the study separated the questionnaires on outcome variables and measured the team performance from the secondary supervisors of teams in order to obtain the objectivity of the measurement.
      For the variables measured, the study added up the individuals' responses by teams and converted them into team variables. In order to secure reasonability, the study calculated within-group interrater agreement(rwg).
      For the statistical analysis of the data, the study conducted reliability analysis apart from descriptive statistics. And for the validity analysis, the study carried out exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. In addition, for the examination of mediated effect the study utilized three-step regression analysis and Sobel test. For the analysis of moderating effect, the study carried out moderated regression analysis. For the statistical analysis of the study, SPSS Windows 20.0 and AMOS 20.0 programs were used.
      The study found the following results. First, team emotional intelligence, empowering leadership, and justice climates, which were the predicted antecedent factors of team characteristics, had positive(+) influence on team trust. Second, the team trust had positive(+) influence on team performance and team engagement which were the outcome variables of team effectiveness. Third, team trust of team members, which is a mediated variable, had mediating effect between antecedent variables (team emotional intelligence, empowering leadership and justice climates) and outcome variables (team performance and team engagement). Fourth, team efficacy of team members did not have moderating effect between major variables (mediating variables) of team trust and team effectiveness and outcome variables of team performance and team engagement.
      Consequently, this study which targeted at team members in an organization investigated psychological conditions and attitudes of the team members in the organization. The study found that in order to enhance team performance and team engagement, which are the behavioral performance in the organization, empowering leadership and justice climates should be shared in an organization coherently. For the empowering leadership, flexibility of organization structure from internal and external environmental changes would have to be considered. And for the justice climates, task implementation of team members in an organization would have to be considered. The study concludes by suggesting the need to search measures to generate more effective performance in the relationship among team trust, team performance and team engagement by pinpointing moderating factors which can maximize the team performance.

      Keyword: team trust, emotional intelligence, empowering leadership, justice climates, team efficacy, team commitment, team performance
      번역하기

      With advancement of information and communication and with acceleration of globalization, the organizational environment is becoming more complex and becoming more uncertain. As an organizational strategy to meet with these environmental changes, org...

      With advancement of information and communication and with acceleration of globalization, the organizational environment is becoming more complex and becoming more uncertain.
      As an organizational strategy to meet with these environmental changes, organizations are flattening their structures and adopting team systems. It is a measure to respond to the environment more actively and more promptly. The heightened needs of members for flat organization culture also have played a role for this expansion of team systems.
      However, despite the active adoption of team systems in the practical business world, the academic interest and practical studies on team systems have not developed broadly. A partial reason for this would be that studies on teams are relatively more burdensome and methodologically more complex compared to studies on individuals.
      A remarkable study among not that numerous team studies is about team trust. Team trust refers to the degree of trust among team members. Just as trusting the organization or supervisors in individual behaviors influences significantly on job satisfaction of team members and organization activities, team trust is assessed as an essential factor having major influence on the team performance.
      However, despite the importance of team trust in the practical world, there have been few studies which deal with development of the concept and criteria of team trust and also few empirical studies on the antecedents and outcomes of team trust.
      Therefore, based on the premise that team trust is very important in determining team performance, this study attempts to identify antecedents of team characteristics and outcomes of team effectiveness which influence team trust by conducting a empirical research.
      Based on literature and theoretical research, this study set antecedent variables of team characteristics as team emotional intelligence, empowering leadership, and justice climates. For the outcome variable of team effectiveness, the study set as team performance and team engagement. Besides, the study set team trust as a mediating variable in the influence process of antecedents on outcomes. Lastly, in the influence process of team trust on team performance and team engagement, which are the team effectiveness, the study set team efficacy as moderating variable and conducted empirical research on this.
      Methodologically, the study conducted team-based study instead of individual based study. For the variables of the research, the study carried out questionnaire research in a self-report format. Throughout the process from distribution to the collection of the questionnaire, the researcher met respondents face to face to make them understand the importance of the study. In order to reduce common method bias, which is a weakness of self-reported questionnaire research, the study separated the questionnaires on outcome variables and measured the team performance from the secondary supervisors of teams in order to obtain the objectivity of the measurement.
      For the variables measured, the study added up the individuals' responses by teams and converted them into team variables. In order to secure reasonability, the study calculated within-group interrater agreement(rwg).
      For the statistical analysis of the data, the study conducted reliability analysis apart from descriptive statistics. And for the validity analysis, the study carried out exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. In addition, for the examination of mediated effect the study utilized three-step regression analysis and Sobel test. For the analysis of moderating effect, the study carried out moderated regression analysis. For the statistical analysis of the study, SPSS Windows 20.0 and AMOS 20.0 programs were used.
      The study found the following results. First, team emotional intelligence, empowering leadership, and justice climates, which were the predicted antecedent factors of team characteristics, had positive(+) influence on team trust. Second, the team trust had positive(+) influence on team performance and team engagement which were the outcome variables of team effectiveness. Third, team trust of team members, which is a mediated variable, had mediating effect between antecedent variables (team emotional intelligence, empowering leadership and justice climates) and outcome variables (team performance and team engagement). Fourth, team efficacy of team members did not have moderating effect between major variables (mediating variables) of team trust and team effectiveness and outcome variables of team performance and team engagement.
      Consequently, this study which targeted at team members in an organization investigated psychological conditions and attitudes of the team members in the organization. The study found that in order to enhance team performance and team engagement, which are the behavioral performance in the organization, empowering leadership and justice climates should be shared in an organization coherently. For the empowering leadership, flexibility of organization structure from internal and external environmental changes would have to be considered. And for the justice climates, task implementation of team members in an organization would have to be considered. The study concludes by suggesting the need to search measures to generate more effective performance in the relationship among team trust, team performance and team engagement by pinpointing moderating factors which can maximize the team performance.

      Keyword: team trust, emotional intelligence, empowering leadership, justice climates, team efficacy, team commitment, team performance

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 제 1 장 서 론 1
      • 제 1 절 연구의 배경과 목적 1
      • 제 2 절 연구의 범위와 연구방법 2
      • 제 1 장 서 론 1
      • 제 1 절 연구의 배경과 목적 1
      • 제 2 절 연구의 범위와 연구방법 2
      • 제 2 장 이론적 배경 5
      • 제 1절 팀 신뢰 5
      • 제 2 절 팀 감성지능 24
      • 제 3 절 임파워링 리더십 36
      • 제 4 절 공정성 풍토 49
      • 제 5 절 팀 효능감 58
      • 제 6 절 팀 몰입 66
      • 제 7 절 팀 성과 71
      • 제 3 장 연구방법 74
      • 제 1절 연구모형 설계 및 가설의 설정 74
      • 제 2 절 변수의 조작적 정의 및 측정 80
      • 제 3 절 설문지 및 표본의 구성 86
      • 제 4 장 실증분석 93
      • 제 1 절 측정도구의 신뢰성과 타당성 검증 93
      • 제 2 절 변수들 간의 상관관계 분석 109
      • 제 3 절 가설검증 111
      • 제 4 절 가설검증 결과의 종합 127
      • 제 5 장 결 론 129
      • 제 1 절 연구결과의 요약 129
      • 제 2 절 연구의 의의 및 시사점 130
      • 제 3 절 연구의 한계와 향후 연구방향 132
      • 참고문헌 134
      • Abstract 158
      • 설 문 지 162
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1. Trust, Davis, Mayer, Schoorman, , 1995

      2. Organizations, March, James G, Blackwell Business, , 1993

      3. Self-efficacy, Prussia, Manz, Self-Efficacy, , 1998

      4. Team leadership, Margerison, Charles J, Thomson, Team leadership, , 2002

      5. Trust and power, Luthmann, , 1979

      6. Trust Development, Lindskold, Trust development, , 1978

      7. Building Commitment, Schweiger, Korsgaard, Sapienza, , 1995

      8. Psychometric Theory, Pummer, , 2000

      9. Emotional intelligence, Goleman, Daniel, Bantam Books, , 1996

      10. Change process research, Greenberg, , 1986

      1. Trust, Davis, Mayer, Schoorman, , 1995

      2. Organizations, March, James G, Blackwell Business, , 1993

      3. Self-efficacy, Prussia, Manz, Self-Efficacy, , 1998

      4. Team leadership, Margerison, Charles J, Thomson, Team leadership, , 2002

      5. Trust and power, Luthmann, , 1979

      6. Trust Development, Lindskold, Trust development, , 1978

      7. Building Commitment, Schweiger, Korsgaard, Sapienza, , 1995

      8. Psychometric Theory, Pummer, , 2000

      9. Emotional intelligence, Goleman, Daniel, Bantam Books, , 1996

      10. Change process research, Greenberg, , 1986

      11. 공변량 구조 분석, 이순묵, , 1990

      12. The design of Work teams, Hackman, J. R., The design of work teams, , 1987

      13. Intelligence and its uses, Thorndike, , 1920

      14. On the etiology of climates, Reichers, Schneider, , 1983

      15. Group and intergroup relations, Alderfer, , 1977

      16. Leadershipinorganizations.4thed, Yukl, Leadership in organizations 4th ed, , 1998

      17. Team Transformational Leadership, Hsu, Mujtaba, , 2007

      18. 임파워먼트 실천 매뉴얼, 박원우, 시그마컨설팅그룹, , 1998

      19. Work team trust and effectiveness, Costa, , 2003

      20. EmotionintheWorkplace:AReappraisal, Ashfoth, Emotion in the Workplace: A Reappraisal, , 1995

      21. Innovation in top management teams, West, Anderson, , 1996

      22. Teams in organizations: Prevalence, Philips, Devine, Clayton, Melner, , 1999

      23. Measuring Trust inside Organisations, Graham Dietz, , 2006

      24. Trust and managerial problem solving, Zend, Trust and managerial problem solving, , 1972

      25. Making the team: A guide for managers, Thompson, , 2003

      26. Measuring and assessing organizations, Van de Ven, Andrew H, Wiley, Measuring and assessing organizations, , 1980

      27. Social capital institutions and trust, Nooteboom, , 2006

      28. Work Groups and Teams inOrganizations, Kozlowski, Bell, Work groups and teams in organizations, , 2003

      29. Can Emotional Intelligence beDeveloped, Dulewicz, Higs, Can Emotional Intelligence be developed?, , 2004

      30. Self-efficacy Mechaism in Human Agency, ura, , 1982

      31. Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control, Bandura.A, Self-efficacy: The exercise of control, , 1997

      32. The social psychology of organizations, Katz, Daniel, J. Wiley, , 1978

      33. A Social Interaction Theory of Emotions, Kemper, , 1978

      34. Citizenship behavior and social Exchange, Utsugi, , 1994

      35. Dynamic Nature of Trust in Virtual Teams, Kanawattanachai, Yoo, , 2002

      36. Social psychology : a brief introduction, McGrath, Joseph Edward, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, , 1964

      37. The prediction of binge eating over time, Greenberg, , 1986

      38. 조직 구성원 간의 신뢰와 연줄, 박통희, 원숙연, , 2000

      39. Building the EmotionalIntelligenceofGroups, Wolff, Druskat, Building the Emotional Intelligence of Groups, , 2001

      40. Comparative fitindexes in structuralmodels, Bentler, Comparative fit indexes in structural models, , 1990

      41. Contingent reward transactional leadership, Orwa, Walumbwa, , 2008

      42. Work Teams: Applications and Effectiveness, K.P.Demeuse, Sundtrom, , 1990

      43. The social psychology of procedural justice, Lind, E. Allan, Plenum Press, The Social psychology of procedural justice, , 1988

      44. Why people obey the law: Procedural justice, Tyler, , 1990

      45. A Review and Meta-analysis of theAntecedents, Mathieu, Zajac, A Review and Meta-Analysis of the Antecedents, , 1990

      46. An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust, Roger, An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust, , 1995

      47. Complex organizations: A sociological reader, Etzioni, Complex organizations : a sociological reader, , 1961

      48. Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis, Tibaut, Walker, Procedural justice: A psychological analysis, , 1975

      49. The Role Of Trust In Organizational Settings, Kurt T.Dirks And Donald L.Ferrin, The role of trust in organizational settings, , 2001

      50. Cooperation and Trust: Some Theoretical Notes, Deutsch, Cooperation and trust: Some theoretical notes, , 1962

      51. On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models, Bagozzi, On the evaluation of structural equation models, , 1988

      52. Self-efficacy beliefs:comparison offivemeasures, Bobko, Lee, Self-efficacy beliefs: Comparison of five measures, , 1994

      53. Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective, ura, Social cognitive theory: An Agentic Perspective, , 2001

      54. Generalized Expectancies for Interpersonal Trust, Rotter, Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust, , 1971

      55. Group influences on individuals in organizations, Hackman, , 1992

      56. The Experience of Powerlessness in Organizations, 한숭희, The experience of powerlessness in organizations, , 1989

      57. Toward General, Principles ofManagerial Fairness, Lewicki, Sheppard, Toward general principles of managerial fairness, , 1987

      58. The human team: Basic motivations and innovations, West, , 2001

      59. Frame of mind: The theory of multiple intelligence, Gardner, Frame of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligence, , 1993

      60. Managerial Responsibilities and Procedural Justice, Bies, Folger, Managerial responsibilities and procedural justice, , 1989

      61. Reconceptualizing the determinants ofrisk behavior, Pablo, Sitkin, Reconceptualizing the determinants of risk behavior, , 1992

      62. 1998) Working with Emotional Intelligence. New York, Goleman, , 1995

      63. A multilevel analysis of procedural justice context, Martin, Bennett, Mossholder, , 1998

      64. Effects of Work and Play Signals on Task Evaluation, Sandelands, , 1988

      65. Emotional Intelligence: AReview and Evaluation Study, Dulewicz, Emotional intelligence: A review and evaluation study, , 2000

      66. Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, andgullibility, Rotter, "Interpersonal trust trustworthiness, , 1980

      67. Social cognitive theory of organizational management, Wood, Bandura, Social Cognitive Theory of Organizational Management, , 1989

      68. 공직몰입을 위한 공무원 인력관리 방안, 조경호, 한국행정학회, 공직몰입을 위한 공무원 인력관리 방안, , 1997

      69. A New Scale for the measurement ofInterpersonal Trust, Rotter, A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust, , 1967

      70. Analysis of Self-Efficacy Theory of Behavioral Change, ura, Adams, Analysis of self-efficacy theory of behavioral change, , 1977

      71. Antecedents and Outcomes of Organizational Commitment, Steers, Antecedents and outcomes of organizational commitment, , 1977

      72. Developing and maintaining trust in workrelationships, Bunker, Lewick, Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships, , 1996

      73. Psychological empowerment in the workplace:dimensions, Spreitzer, Psychological Empowerment in the Workplace: Dimensions, , 1995

      74. 21세기 리더십과 임파워먼트에 관한 연구, 한동훈, , 2006

      75. Cognitive and affective trust in service relationships, Johnson, Grayson, Cognitive and Affective Trust in Service Relationships, , 2005

      76. Efficacy performance spirals: A multilevel perspective, Lindsley, Thomas, Efficacy-Performance Spirals: A Multilevel Perspective, , 1994

      77. Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow, 윤정주, "Organizational Justice: Yesterday, , 1990

      78. The impact of trust on creative problem solving groups, Klimoski, Karol, , 1976

      79. The centrality of interpersonal trust ingroup processes, Golembiewski, McConkie, The centrality of interpersonal trust in group processes, , 1975

      80. (Amos 17.0) 구조방정식 모델링 : 원리와 실제, 배병렬, 청람출판사, Amos 17.0 구조방정식모델링: 원리와 실제, , 2009

      81. Equity and the use of overreward to motivate performance, Leventhal, Greenberg, , 1976

      82. Knowledge worker team effectivness: The role of autonomy, Janz, Colquitt, Noe, , 1997

      83. The Empowerment Process : IntegratingTheory and Practice, J.A.Conger, R.N.Kanungo, The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice, , 1988

      84. Information sharing and team performance: A meta-analysis, DeChurch, Mesmer-Magnus, Information Sharing and Team Performance: A Meta-Analysis, , 2009

      85. Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness, Bries, Moag, Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness, , 1986

      86. Managing I/S DesignTeams : A Control Theories Perspective, Henderson, Lee Soonchul, , 1992

      87. Trust and Distrust in Organizations: EmergingPerspectives, Kramer, Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging Perspectives, , 1999

      88. Trust: Forms Foundations, Functions, Failures and Figures, Nooteboom, "Trust: Forms Foundations, , 2002

      89. A temporallybased framework and taxonomy of team processes, Marks, Zaccaro, A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes, , 2001

      90. Group Performance and Intergroup Relations inOrganizations, Guzzo, G.Shea, Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations, , 1992

      91. Strategies for adapting to high rates of employee turnover, Mowday, , 1984

      92. 팀신뢰의 개념정립과 척도개발에 관한 연구, 안성익, 서울대학교 대학원, 팀 신뢰의 개념정립과 척도개발에 관한 연구, , 2011

      93. 회고적 기법을 활용한 집단개발단계의 측정, 박종혁, 홍용기, , 2009

      94. A predictive model of self-managing work team effectiveness, Ledford, Spreitzer, Cohen, , 1996

      95. Anexaminationofthenatureoftrustin buyerseller relationships, P.M.Doney, An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer-Seller Relationships, , 1997

      96. Employeeorganization linkages: The psychology of commitment, Mowday, Steers, Employee-organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, , 1982

      97. International Joint Venture Trust: An Empirical Examination, Inkpen, Currall, , 1997

      98. A review and reconceptualization of organizationalcommitment, Richter, A Review and Reconceptualization of Organizational Commitment, , 1985

      99. Interrater reliability and agreement of subjective judgments, Tinsley, Weiss, , 1975

      100. Measuring trust between organizational boundary role persons, Currall, Judge, Measuring trust between organizational boundary role persons, , 1995

      101. Commitment and the control oforganizationalbehaviorand belief, Salancik, Staw, Commitment and the control of organizational behavior and belief, , 1977

      102. Not So Different After All : A Cross-Discipline View of Trust, Sitkin, R.S.Burt, C.Camerer, , 1998

      103. Social Structural Characteristics of Psychological Empowerment, 조부경, Social Structural Characteristics Of Psychological Empowerment, , 1996

      104. The organizationaltrustinventory(OTI):Developmentandvalidation, Cummins, Bromiley.P, The Organizational Trust Inventory (OTI): Development and validation, , 1996

      105. Further Understanding of Trust and Performance in Virtual Teams, Aubert, Kelsey, , 2003

      106. Reinventing leadership : strategies to empower the organization, Bennis, Warren G, HarperCollins, , 1995

      107. Trust within teams: the relation with performance effectiveness, Costa, Taillieu, Roe, Trust within teams: The relation with performance effectiveness, , 2001

      108. An exploration of clmates for technical updating and performance, Hults, Kozlowski, , 1987

      109. Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 이재분, Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, , 1986

      110. A Three-Component Conceptualization of Organizational Commitment,, Allen N. J. & Meyer J. P, A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment, , 1991

      111. Regulation of cognitive processes through perceived self-efficacy, Bandura, , 1989

      112. Gauging the relationship between self-efficacy judgment and action, Bandura, , 1980

      113. Is Anybody Out There? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual Teams, D.E.Leidner, Jarvenpaa, K.Knoll, , 1998

      114. Transformational leadership or the iron cage: which predicts trust, Kelloway, Arnold, Barling, , 2001

      115. Determinants of Long-Term Orientation in Buyer-Seller Relationships, Shanker Ganesan, Determinants of Long-Term Orientation in Buyer-Seller Relationships, , 1994

      116. Economic Action and Social Structure : The Problem of Embed Dedness, Tiffin, McCormick, , 1985

      117. Empowerment in Organizations : How to Spark Exceptional Performance, Murrell, Vort, Empowerment in organizations: How to spark exceptional performance, , 1990

      118. Executive EQ: Emotional Intelligence in Leadershipand Organizations, Cooper, Sawaf, Executive EQ: emotional intelligence in leadership and organizations, , 1997

      119. Can we trust trust? Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations, Gambetta, , 1988

      120. Career-Oriented Versus Team-Oriented Commitment and Behavior at Work, Gild, , 1998

      121. Social foundations of thought and action : a social cognitive theory, Bandura, Albert, Prentice-Hall, Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory, , 1986

      122. Group emotional intelligence and its influence on group effectiveness, Druskat, Wolff, Group Emotional Intelligence and Its Influence on Group Effectiveness, , 2001

      123. Empowering Leadershipin Management Teams: Effects on Knowledge Sharing, Locke, Srivastava, Bartol, Empowering Leadership in Management Teams: Effects on Knowledge Sharing, , 2006

      124. Influence of socialcomparisons on perceptions of organizational fairness, Ambrose, Harland, Kulik, Influence of social comparisons on perceptions of organizational fairness, , 1991

      125. Shared and Configural Justice: A Social Network Model of Justice in Teams, Roberson, Colquitt, , 2005

      126. The effects of team-skills training on transactive memory and performance, M.J.Ashleigh, Prichard, The Effects of Team-Skills Training on Transactive Memory and Performance, , 2007

      127. The reciprocal nature of trust: a longitudinal study of interacting teams, Serva1, Fuller, Mayer, , 2005

      128. TheExperienceandEvolutionofTrust Implications for Cooperation and Teamwork, Kaplan, The Experience and Evolution of Trust: Implications for Cooperation and Teamwork, , 1992

      129. Trust in employee/employerrelationship: A survey of West Michigan managers, Mishra, Morrissey, Trust in employee/employer relationship: A survey of west Michigan managers, , 1990

      130. Justice in teams:Antecedents and consequences of procedural justice climate, Colquitt, Noe, Jackson, , 2002

      131. Transformational leadership and shared values: The building blocks of trust, Gillespie, N. A., Gillespie, Mann, , 2004

      132. Understanding the Influence of National Culture on the Development of Trust, Doney, M.R.Mullen, J.P.Cannon.Cannon, Understanding the Influence of National Culture on the Development of Trust, , 1998

      133. Directand indirecteffectsof third-party relationships on interpersonal trust, Ferrin, Direct and indirect effects of third-party relationships on interpersonal trust, , 2006

      134. Structural Model Evaluation and Modification: An Interval EstimationApproach, Steiger, Structural Model Evaluation and Modification: An Interval Estimation Approach, , 1990

      135. 소기업의 응집력, 과업상호의존성,협력 및 성과간의 관계, 백유성, 김종우, 이지우, "소기업의 응집력 과업상호의존성, , 2005

      136. Explaining The Limited Effectiveness of Legalistic Remedies For Trust/Distrust, Sitkin, Roth N, Explaining the Limited Effectiveness of Legalistic “Remedies” for Trust/Distrust, , 1993

      137. The effects of conflict trust, and task commitment on project team performance, Porter, Lilly, "The effects of conflict trust, , 1996

      138. AnexaminationoforganizationalandTeam Commitmentinaself-DirectedTeam Environment, Bishop, , 2000

      139. Relationships Between Organizational Justice and Burnout at the Work-Unit Level, Moliner, Peir?, Ramos, Cropanzano, Mart?nez-Tur, , 2005

      140. A case for procedural justice climate: Development and test of a multilevel model, Naumann, Bennett, , 2000

      141. Effects of Procedural and DistributiveJustice on Reactions to Pay Raise Decisions, Konovsky, Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reactions to Pay Raise Decisions, , 1989

      142. Hierarchically nested covariance structure models for multitrait-multimethod data, Widaman, K. F., Widaman, Hierarchically Nested Covariance Structure Models for Multitrait-Multimethod Data, , 1985

      143. Trust : The Connecting Link Between Organizational Theory And Philosophical Ethics, Larue Tone Hosmer, Trust: The connecting Link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics, , 1995

      144. On the Dimensionality of OrganizationalJustice: A Construct Validation of a Measure, Colquitt, On the Dimensionality of Organizational Justice: A Construct Validation of a Measure, , 2001

      145. An Empirical Assessment of OrganizationalCommitment and Organizational Effectiveness, Perry, Harold, An Empirical Assessment of Organizational Commitment and Organizational Effectiveness, , 1981

      146. Cognitive Elements of Empowerment:An"Interpretive Model of Intrinsic Task Motivation, Wiggins, "Cognitive Elements of Empowerment: An ""Interpretive"" Model of Intrinsic Task Motivation", , 1990

      147. 팀신뢰 연구의 현황 및 이슈 정립과 향후 연구방안에 대한 제언, 안성익, 박원우, , 2010

      148. Decoupling task and relationship conflict: the role of intragroup emotional processing, Yang, Mossholder, , 2004

      149. Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice, Ferrin, Kurt, Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice, , 2000

      150. 경영자에 대한 신뢰의 형성요인과 종업원 태도 및 행동과의 관계, 이상갑, 서강대학교, "서강대학교 대학원, , 2006

      151. Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict, and Performance, Pelled, Xin, Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity Conflict and Performance, , 1999

      152. Theeffectoftheperformanceappraisalsystem on trustformanagement:A field quasi-experiment, Mayer, The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment, , 1999

      153. A meta-analytic review of relationships between teamdesign features and team performance, Stewart, A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance, , 2006

      154. A matter of trust: Effects on the performance and effectiveness of teams in organizations, Costa, , 2000

      155. How Does Trust Affect the Performance of Ongoing Teams? The Mediating Role of Reflexivity, De Jong, Elfring, , 2010

      156. A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Organizational Behavior Modification on Task Performance, Luthans, Stajkovic, , 1997

      157. Emotional experiences during engagement in intrinsically and extrinsically motivated tasks, Matsumoto, Sanders, , 1988

      158. Team effectiveness1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future, Gilson, Maynard, Mathieu, Rapp, Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future, , 2008

      159. 한국기업조직에서 감성지능이 조직몰입에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구, 정동섭(Jung Dong Seob), 정현우(Jung Hyun Woo), 慶星大學校 社會科學硏究所, , 2007

      160. Emotionalintelligence as a moderator of emotional and behavioralreactions to job insecurity, Jordan, Hartel, , 2002

      161. The pursuit of organizational justice: From conceptualization to implication to application, Greenberg, Lind, The pursuit of organizational justice: From conceptualization to implication to application, , 2000

      162. 자기효능감 및 인적자원관리가 조직몰입 및 직무만족에 미치는 영향, 이기영, , 2005

      163. The social psychology of time: Entrainment of behavior in social and organizational settings, Machatka, McGrath, Kelly, , 1984

      164. Theimpactofjusticeclimateandjusticeorientationonworkoutcomes:A cross-levelmultifociframework, Liao, The impact of justice climate and justice orientation on work outcomes: A cross-level multifoci framework, , 2005

      165. What make team work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite, Cohen, Bailey, , 1997

      166. Empowering Leadership: An Examination of Mediating Mechanisms within A Hierarchical Structure, Vecchio, Pearce, , 2010

      167. Managing emotions during team problem solving: emotional intelligence and conflict resolution, Jordan,P.J., Managing Emotions during Team Problem Solving: Emotional Intelligence and Conflict Resolution, , 2004

      168. 조직구성원의 감성지능이 조직시민행동에 미치는 영향:LMX의 조절효과, 김창호, 정현우, 조직구성원의 감성지능이 조직시민행동에 미치는 영향: LMX의 조절효과, , 2007

      169. Affect and Cognition-based Trust as Foundations for interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations, Meyer Stanley, Affect and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations, , 1995

      170. From embedded knowledge to embodied knowledge: New product development as knowledge management, Madhavan, Grover.R, From Embedded Knowledge to Embodied Knowledge: New Product Development as Knowledge Management, , 1998

      171. Psychological Models of the Justice Motive: Antecedents of Distributive and Procedural Justice, Weun, Psychological models of the justice motive: Antecedents of distributive and procedural justice, , 1997

      172. 임파워먼트 : 다수준의 과정개념(개념의 이해와 실천수단에 대한 소고), 박내회, , 1997

      173. Integrating Justice Constructs into the Turnover Process : A Test of a Referent cognitions Model, Aqunio, Hom, Integrating Justice Constructs into the Turnover Process: A Test of a Referent Cognitions Model, , 1997

      174. Relationships between Work Group Characteristics and Effectiveness : A Replication and Extension, Campion, Medsker, Papper, , 1996

      175. The dynamic nature of conflict: Alongitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance, Mannix, Jehn, The Dynamic Nature of Conflict:A Longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and Group Performance, , 2001

      176. A multilevelapproach to theory andresearchinorganizations:Contextualtemporal,andemergentprocesses, Kozolowski, "A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual temporal, , 2000

      177. The Impact of Perceived Group SuccessFailure on Motivational Beliefs and Attitudes: A Causal Model, P.A.Knight, Riggs, The impact of perceived group success-failure on motivational beliefs and attitudes: a causal model, , 1994

      178. Does Trust Matter?Exploring the Effects of Interorganizational and InterpersonalTrust on Performance, Zheer, Does Trust Matter? Exploring the Effects of Interorganizational and Interpersonal Trust on Performance, , 1998

      179. The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: the Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer, L.C.Abrams, R.L.Cross, Levin, The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer, , 2002

      180. 호텔기업의 리더십 유형이 구성원의 임파워먼트와 조직몰입에 미치는 영향, 윤지환, 김영국, 백종철, 한국관광학회, , 2002

      181. Measuring climate for work group innovation: Development and validation of the Team Climate Inventory, West, Anderson, , 1998

      182. It could be worse: A study on the alleviating roles of trust and connectedness in intragroup conflicts, Greer, Rispens, Jehn, , 2007

      183. Too much of a good thing? negative effects of hightrust and individual autonomy in self-managing teams, Langfred, C. W., Langfred, Too much of a good thing? Negative effects of high trust and individual autonomy in self-managing teams, , 2004

      184. Strategic decision making: The effects of cognitive diversity, conflict, and trust on decision outcomes, Bao, Parayitam, Olson, "Strategic Decision Making: The Effects of Cognitive Diversity, , 2007

      185. The Effects of Organizational Differences andTrust on the Effectiveness of Selling Partner Relationships, D.Barclay, Smith, , 1997

      186. What should be done with equity theory? : New approaches to the studyof fairness in social relationships, Levinthal, What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships, , 1980

      187. The Team Climate Inventory: Development of the TCI and its application in team building for innovativeness, West, Anderson, , 1996

      188. 절차공정성과 조직시민행동간 관계에 있어서 공유가치의 매개효과에 관한 연구, 한광현, 大韓經營學會, "대한경영학회, , 2000

      189. Justice as a mediator of the relationshipbetween methods ofmonitoring and organizational citizenshipbehavior, Moorman, Niheoff, Justice as a Mediator of the Relationship between Methods of Monitoring and Organizational Citizenship Behavior, , 1993

      190. The effects of leader and follower emotional intelligence on performance and attitude : An exploratory study, 한국통합교육학회, , 2002

      191. 개인혁신행동의 선행요인으로서 조직공정성과 조직지원인식의 역할에 관한 연구, 양인덕(Young Linn Derg), 김동환(Kim Dong-Hwan), 한국인사관리학회, "인사관리연구, , 2009

      192. The structure andfunction of collective constructs: Implications for multilevelresearch and theory development, Hofmann, Morgeson, The Structure and Function of Collective Constructs: Implications for Multilevel Research and Theory Development, , 1999

      193. 인지된 조직의 팀지원과 서번트 리더십이 팀에피커시와 팀시민행동에 미치는 영향, 차동옥, 김창호, , 2008

      194. Emotional Intelligence in the Workplace:Exploring its effects on Occupational Stress and OrganizationalCommitment, Tsaousis, Nikolaou, Emotional Intelligence in the Workplace: Exploring its effects on occupational stress and organizational commitment, , 2002

      195. Managers asInitiators of Trust: An Exchange Relationship Framework for UnderstandingManagerial Trustworthy Behavior, Whitner E.M, Werner J.M, Susan E.Brodt, Managers as Initiators of Trust: An Exchange Relationship Framework for Understanding Managerial Trustworthy Behavior, , 1998

      196. The effect of goal setting, self-efficacy, competition, and personal trials on the performance of an endurance task, Locke, Lerner, "The effect of goal setting, , 1995

      197. Measurement of Specific InterpersonalTrust: Construction and Validation of a Scale to Assess Trust in a SpecificOther, Swap W.C, Jonson-George, Measurement of specific interpersonal trust: Construction and validation of a scale to assess trust in a specific other, , 1982

      198. Relationships between Work Group Characteristics and Effectiveness : Implications for Designing Effective Work Groups, Campion, Higgs, Medsker, , 1993

      199. A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational commitment and salesperson job performance: 25 years of research, Jaramillo, Mulkim J.P, Marshall, , 2005

      200. An Information Processing Approach for Deciding Upon Control Strategies and Reducing Control Loss in Emerging Organizations, Leifer, Mills, , 1996

      201. 심리적 안전감과 상사신뢰가 조직몰입 및 직무성과에 미치는 영향: 조직후원인식의 매개효과, 양동민, 이희정, 심덕섭, , 2009

      202. The Moderator-mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic and Statistical Considerations, David A.Kenny, Reuben M.Baron, "The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, , 1986

      203. Trust, trustworthiness, and trustpropensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk takingand job performance, Colquitt, Scott, LePine, "Trust, , 2007

      204. Building genuine trust through interpersonal emotion management: A threat regulation model of trust and collaboration across boundaries, Williams, , 2007

      205. 학교장의 감성지능 및 직무역량이 리더-구성원 교환관계를매개로 직무만족과 조직몰입에 미치는 영향, 김일형, 학교장의 감성지능 및 직무역량이 리더-구성원 교환관계를 매개로 직무만족과 조직몰입에 미치는 영향, , 2009

      206. A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships, Gully, J.M.Beaubien, K.A.Incalcaterra, "A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, , 2002

      207. Emotional Intelligence in Teams: Development and Initial Validation of the Short Version of the Workgroup Emotional Intelligence Profile (WEIP-S), Jordan, Lawrence, , 2009

      208. 조직공정성과 임금만족간의 인과관계: 절차적 공정성 상호작용 공정성, 분배적 공정성간의 관계와 역할을 중심으로, 이경근, 박성수, "조직공정성과 임금만족간의 인과관계: 절차적 공정성 상호작용 공정성, , 1999

      209. It takes two to tango: An interdependence analysis of the spiraling of perceived trustworthiness and cooperation in interpersonal and intergroup relationships, Kohlesc, Ferrina, Michelle C.B, , 2008

      210. 지방행정기관 공무원들 간의 웹 사이트 활용 태도에 영향을 미치는 요인 분석: 상호작용성 유용성, 가치 등을 중심으로, 김구, 오을임, "지방행정기관 공무원들 간의 웹 사이트 활용 태도에 영향을 미치는 요인 분석: 상호작용성 유용성, , 2004

      211. 직무요구-통제 모형에 의한 사원들의 직무소진(job burnout)에 관한 연구 : 적극적 성격과 자기효능감 변수의 조절효과를 중심으로, 박상원, , 2006

      212. 임파워링 리더십이 조직구성원의 혁신행동과 조직시민행동에 미치는 영향 임파워링 리더십이 조직구성원의 혁신행동과 조직시민행동에 미치는 영향, 이승일, , 2006

      213. Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive directive, transactional, transformational and empowering leader behaviors.??, H.P.Jr.Sims, Pearce, "Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive directive, , 2002

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼