RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    중학 영재학생과 일반학생의 리더쉽기술, 사회성숙도 및 행위통제 분석 = (An) Analysis of leadership skills, social maturity and action control between gifted and average middle school students

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10099513

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was to analyze leadership skills, social maturity and action control of gifted middle school students compare to average middle school students. The impetus for this study was the paucity of research concerning the leadership skills of gifted students.
    Four this purpose, three research questions were investigated:
    (1) Do relationships between leadership skills, social maturity and action control exist among the gifted and average students? (2) Are there any differences of leadership skills, social maturity and action control among the gifted and average students? (3) Is it possible to discriminate among the groups based on differences of leadership skills, social maturity and action control?
    The subjects for this study were 536 middle school students (mathematically gifted, scientifically gifted, liberal arts gifted and average students) in 1th or 2th grade in Pusan, Korea.
    First of all, the reliability of measurement instrument was verified through a pre-study. The instruments used in this study were leadership skill questionnaire, social maturity and action control test. For the first research question canonical correlation analysis was used. Two-way ANOVA and MANOVA were used to investigate the second research question. Discriminative Analysis was used to investigate the third research question. The results of this study were as follows:
    First, according to the results of canonical correlation analysis, leadership skills were significantly associated with social maturity of gifted and average students. Also leadership skills were significantly associated with action control of gifted and average students.
    Second, according to the result of two-way ANOVA and MANOVA analysis, there were significant differences in leadership skills between gifted and average students. Gifted students scored significantly higher than did average stuents in all subscale of leadership skills measure. Also, there were statistical differences in leadership skills by sex. But there were not differences in leadership skills interaction between school quality and sex. There were significant differences in social maturity between gifted and average students. Gifted students scored significantly higher than did average students on the social maturity. Also, there were statistical differences in social maturity by sex. But there were not differences in leadership skills interaction between school quality and sex. There were differences in action control measure between gifted and average students. There were especially significant differences in one subscale of action control measure - hesitation - between gifted and average students by student quality only.
    Third, the result of the discriminative analysis, it shows that leadership skills, social maturity and action control were useful variables for discriminating between the gifted and average groups. Also, it shows that leadership skills were important variables for discriminating between gifted and average students.
    In conclusion, leadership skills, social maturity and action control of students are very important factors in youth leadership education. Therefore, we need the cognition of those three factors for the ideal gifted identification and leadership program development. Research suggestions and implications for youth leadership development by student quality are discussed.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was to analyze leadership skills, social maturity and action control of gifted middle school students compare to average middle school students. The impetus for this study was the paucity of research concerning the leadership...

    The purpose of this study was to analyze leadership skills, social maturity and action control of gifted middle school students compare to average middle school students. The impetus for this study was the paucity of research concerning the leadership skills of gifted students.
    Four this purpose, three research questions were investigated:
    (1) Do relationships between leadership skills, social maturity and action control exist among the gifted and average students? (2) Are there any differences of leadership skills, social maturity and action control among the gifted and average students? (3) Is it possible to discriminate among the groups based on differences of leadership skills, social maturity and action control?
    The subjects for this study were 536 middle school students (mathematically gifted, scientifically gifted, liberal arts gifted and average students) in 1th or 2th grade in Pusan, Korea.
    First of all, the reliability of measurement instrument was verified through a pre-study. The instruments used in this study were leadership skill questionnaire, social maturity and action control test. For the first research question canonical correlation analysis was used. Two-way ANOVA and MANOVA were used to investigate the second research question. Discriminative Analysis was used to investigate the third research question. The results of this study were as follows:
    First, according to the results of canonical correlation analysis, leadership skills were significantly associated with social maturity of gifted and average students. Also leadership skills were significantly associated with action control of gifted and average students.
    Second, according to the result of two-way ANOVA and MANOVA analysis, there were significant differences in leadership skills between gifted and average students. Gifted students scored significantly higher than did average stuents in all subscale of leadership skills measure. Also, there were statistical differences in leadership skills by sex. But there were not differences in leadership skills interaction between school quality and sex. There were significant differences in social maturity between gifted and average students. Gifted students scored significantly higher than did average students on the social maturity. Also, there were statistical differences in social maturity by sex. But there were not differences in leadership skills interaction between school quality and sex. There were differences in action control measure between gifted and average students. There were especially significant differences in one subscale of action control measure - hesitation - between gifted and average students by student quality only.
    Third, the result of the discriminative analysis, it shows that leadership skills, social maturity and action control were useful variables for discriminating between the gifted and average groups. Also, it shows that leadership skills were important variables for discriminating between gifted and average students.
    In conclusion, leadership skills, social maturity and action control of students are very important factors in youth leadership education. Therefore, we need the cognition of those three factors for the ideal gifted identification and leadership program development. Research suggestions and implications for youth leadership development by student quality are discussed.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목차
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 의의 = 1
    • 2. 연구 문제 = 6
    • 3. 용어의 정의 = 7
    • 목차
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 의의 = 1
    • 2. 연구 문제 = 6
    • 3. 용어의 정의 = 7
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 10
    • 1. 영재의 정의와 특성 = 10
    • 1) 영재의 정의 = 10
    • 2) 영재의 특성 = 17
    • 2. 리더쉽의 이론적 고찰 = 20
    • 1) 리더쉽 정의 = 20
    • 2) 대표적 리더쉽 이론 = 22
    • 3) 청소년 리더쉽 특성과 기술 = 27
    • 3. 청소년의 사회성숙도와 행위통제 = 35
    • 1) 청소년의 사회성숙도 = 35
    • 2) 청소년의 행위통제 = 37
    • 4. 관련 선행연구 = 42
    • 1) 리더쉽기술과 사회성숙도 및 행위통제 관련 선행연구 = 42
    • 2) 영재의 리더쉽기술, 사회성숙도 및 행위통제 관련 선행연구 = 44
    • Ⅲ. 연구방법 = 48
    • 1. 연구 대상 = 48
    • 2. 측정 도구 = 50
    • 3. 자료수집 방법 및 절차 = 55
    • 4. 자료 처리 = 56
    • Ⅳ. 연구 결과 = 58
    • 1. 영재학생과 일반학생의 리더쉽기술과 사회성숙도 및 행위통제 간의 관계 = 58
    • 2. 영재학생과 일반학생의 리더쉽기술, 사회성숙도, 행위통제의 차이 = 68
    • 3. 리더쉽기술과 사회성숙도 및 행위통제에 의한 영재학생과 일반학생의 판별 = 81
    • Ⅴ. 논의 = 87
    • 1. 영재학생과 일반학생의 리더쉽기술과 사회성숙도 및 행위통제간의 관계 = 87
    • 2. 영재학생과 일반학생의 리더쉽기술, 사회성숙도, 행위통제의 차이 = 89
    • 3. 리더쉽기술과 사회성숙도 및 행위통제에 의한 영재학생과 일반학생의 판별 = 93
    • Ⅵ. 요약 및 결론 = 95
    • 1. 요약 = 95
    • 2. 결론 및 제언 = 97
    • 참고문헌 = 100
    • 부록 = 117
    • Abstract = 131
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1. Leading Minds, Gardner, 송기동, , 2007

    2. On Leadership, Gerdner.J.W, , 1990

    3. Choosing to lead, Clark, , 1994

    4. 사회성숙도검사, 김승국, 中央敵性出版社, 사회성숙도검사, , 1998

    5. 영재교육학원론, 박성익, 교육과학사, , 2003

    6. Handbook of Leadership, Stogdill, Handbook of leadership, , 1974

    7. Measures of leadership, Clark, Kenneth E, Leadership Library of America, , 1990

    8. The leadership equation, Barr, , 1989

    9. The manaherial hrid Ⅲ, Blake, Mouton, , 1985

    10. 지도력 진단 도구, 정회욱, , 2003

    1. Leading Minds, Gardner, 송기동, , 2007

    2. On Leadership, Gerdner.J.W, , 1990

    3. Choosing to lead, Clark, , 1994

    4. 사회성숙도검사, 김승국, 中央敵性出版社, 사회성숙도검사, , 1998

    5. 영재교육학원론, 박성익, 교육과학사, , 2003

    6. Handbook of Leadership, Stogdill, Handbook of leadership, , 1974

    7. Measures of leadership, Clark, Kenneth E, Leadership Library of America, , 1990

    8. The leadership equation, Barr, , 1989

    9. The manaherial hrid Ⅲ, Blake, Mouton, , 1985

    10. 지도력 진단 도구, 정회욱, , 2003

    11. 창조적 리더쉽 코치, 정창덕, , 2003

    12. Promoting Youth Development, Pittman, , 1991

    13. Personality and social change, Newcomb, , 1943

    14. 리더쉽의 이론과 실제, 신응섭, 학지사, , 1999

    15. 영재성의 정의와 발달, 조석희, , 2003

    16. Training extraordinary leaders, Plowman, , 1981

    17. 「영재교육 실천방안」, 한국교육개발원, 한국교육개발원, , 2001

    18. 영재교육의 이론적 기저, 신세호, 배호구, , 1979

    19. Roets rating scale for leadership, Roets, , 1986

    20. The four competencies of leadership, Bennis, , 1984

    21. Life skills for 4-H leadership roles, Miller, R. A., , 1975

    22. SPSS/PC를 이용한 다변량 분석, 이영준, SPSS/PC+를 이용한 다변량분석, , 1991

    23. Tracing leadership in gifted children, Weissler, Landau, , 1991

    24. Self-efficacy Mechaism in Human Agency, ura, , 1982

    25. Using multivariate statistics (2nd ed.), Tabachnick, B. G., , 1996

    26. Canonical analysis. In J. P. Keeves(Ed.), Thomson, , 1988

    27. Leaders: The Strategees for Taking Charge, Bennes, Nanus, , 1980

    28. Psychological type: Implications for gifted, Alvino, , 1989

    29. Indicators of high ability in young children, Browder, Perleth, Lehwald, , 1993

    30. Murphy-Meisgeier type indicator for children, Murphy, Meisgeier, , 1987

    31. Thinking processes: Being and becoming gifted, White, , 1993

    32. Education of the gifted and talented (4th ed.), Davis, G. A., , 1998

    33. 小子報를 통해 본 과학영재의 심리, 김언주, 육근철, 이군현, , 1996

    34. Khatena-Morse Multi-talent Perception Inventory, Morse, Khatena, , 1994

    35. 조기 진급 및 졸업제의 이론과 실제, 임선하, 오영주, 조석희, , 1996

    36. Leader/Agent's guide: leadership and Life skills, Miller, R. A., , 1976

    37. What makes giftedness?: Reexamining a definition, Renzulli, What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition, , 1978

    38. Eby gifted behavior index (Administration manual), Eby, , 1989

    39. 영재교육의 새로운 동향: 리더쉽개발, 한선화, , 2003

    40. A conception of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg(Ed.), Feldhusen, , 1986

    41. Frames of mind : the theory of multiple intelligences, Gardner, Howard, BasicBooks, Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences,

    42. Managing the social and emotional needs of the gifted, Schmitz, Galbraith, , 1985

    43. Attitudes of intellectually gifted youth toward school, Whorton, Karnes, , 1998

    44. Comprehensive curriculum for gifted learners (2nd ed.), VanTassel-Baska, Comprehensive curriculum for gifted learners(2nd ed.), , 1993

    45. 영재 교수-학습 방법 개발의 방향과 쟁점, 박성익, , 2002

    46. Curriculum materials for vocational youth organizations, Feldhusen, Richardson, Hynes, , 1977

    47. 영재성과 영재교육의 개념: 피라미드 모델, 조석희, , 1995

    48. 영재 학생의 심리, 사회적 특성과 지도방법, 윤여홍, "영재 학생의 심리, , 1998

    49. Instruments for Measuring Leadership in Children and Youth, Karnes, Shaunessy, , 2004

    50. A factor analysis on the personality of high school leaders, Flemming, , 1943

    51. Giftedness: A psycosocial approach. In R. J. Sternberg(Ed.), Tannenbaum, , 1986

    52. Hereditary genius : an inquiry into its laws and consequences, Galton, Francis, J. Friedmann, , 1978

    53. National assessment of experiential education: A final report, Conrad, Hedin, , 1981

    54. A lamp for Diogenes: Leadership giftedness and moral education, Lindsay, , 1988

    55. Manual and norms for the High School Personality Questionnaire, Johns, Cattell, , 1984

    56. Emotional Intelligence: Imagination, cognition, and personaoity, Salovey, Mayer, "Emotional Intelligence: Imagination, , 1990

    57. Student leaders and their parents' perceptions of social skills, D'Ilio, Karnes, , 1992

    58. A study of leadership potential in middle school gifted students, Meriweather, , 1989

    59. Sex-role stereotyping of leadership positions by student leaders, Karnes, D'Ilio, , 1990

    60. 영재아동의 사회성숙도와 또래지위에 관한 연구, 최혜승, 大田大學校 大學院, 대전대학교 석사학위논문, , 2004

    61. Stogdill's handbook of leadership: A survey oftheory and research, Bass, Stogdill's handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research, , 1981

    62. The Leadership training model: Integrated curriculum for the gifted, Parker, , 1983

    63. 청소년의 리더쉽생할기술과 관련변인에 관한 연구, 최창욱, , 2001

    64. Intellectually gifted elementary students' perceptions of leadership, Riley, Karnes, , 1994

    65. 청소년참여를 통한 리더쉽 생활기술 프로그램 개발, 김정대, , 2001

    66. Atriarchic theory of intellectual giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg(Ed.), Sternberg, , 1986

    67. Identifying the leadership gifted: Self, peer, or teacher nominations, Van Dyke, Friedman, "Identifying the leadership gifted: Self, , 1984

    68. Scales for rating the behavioral characteristics of superior students, Renzulli, Joseph S, Creative Learning Press, , 1976

    69. Children's perceptions of leadership: A report of preliminary findengs, Nemerowicz, Rosi, , 1995

    70. Self concept in gifted children: Differential impact in boys and girls, Loeb, Jay, , 1987

    71. The identification of leadership potential. In J. Cawood, et al. (Eds.), Conradie, "The identification of leadership potential. In J. Cawood, , 1984

    72. The fulfilment of puomise: 40 years follow-rp of the terman gifted group, Oden, , 1968

    73. Preparing gifted youth for leadership roles in a rapidly changing society, Feldhusen, Kennedy, , 1988

    74. Society, Social Structure and Child Socialization. In Clausen, J. A.(Eds.), Inkeles, "Society, , 1968

    75. Investigation of the leadership abilities of intellectually gifted students, Schakel, , 1984

    76. Gifted education-identification and provision, resource material for teacher, George, "Gifted education-identification and provision, , 1995

    77. Life Skill Development Related to Participation in 4-H Animal Science Projects, Ward, , 1996

    78. 가정의 심리적 환경이 영재아의 사회성숙도에 미치는 영향, 송영민, 건국대학교, , 2001

    79. Competency, ccping, and contributory life skills development of early adolescents, Miller, Bowen, "Competency, , 1993

    80. The use of personality measures in the leadership development program. Greensboro, Velsor, Campbell, , 1985

    81. Youth leadership : a guide to understanding leadership development in adolescents, Van Linden, Josephine A., Jossey-Bass Publishers, Youth leadership: A guide to understanding leadership development in adolescents, , 1998

    82. Leadership and leadership effectiveness traits. In L. Petrullo & B. M. Bass (Eds.), Fiedler, , 1961

    83. Self-perceived youth leadership and life skills development among Iowa FFA members, Wingenbach, , 1995

    84. 영재학생과 일반학생의 리더쉽기술과 사회성숙도의 비교연구, 유순화, 한선화, 강승희, , 2005

    85. A leadership profile of disadvantaged youth based on leadership strengths indicator, Riley, Karnes, , 1994

    86. The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and leadership. In K. E. Clark & M. B. Clark (Eds.), McCaulley, , 1990

    87. Qualities associated with leadership in extracurricular activities of the high school, Belligworth, , 1930

    88. Metamemory, memory performance, and causal attributions in gifted and average children, Weinert, Kurtz, "Metamemory, , 1989

    89. Off the track: Why and how sucessful executives get drailed (Trechnical Report No. 21), Lombardo, McCall, , 1983

    90. Counseling needs and programs for the gifted. In K. Heller, F. Monks, & A. Passow(Eds.), Silverman, "Counseling needs and programs for the gifted. In K. Heller, , 1993

    91. 영재아동의 정서적 특성에 관한 임상연구. 정신 건강을 위한 지도, 윤여홍, , 1996

    92. Developing a scale to research and evaluate youth leadership and life skills development, Clason, Dormody, Seevers, , 1995

    93. Genetic study of genius: Vol. 1. Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children, Terman, , 1925

    94. A Study of Leadership Characteristics and Skills of Gifted and Talented Secondary Students, Betsy, , 1996

    95. Perceptions of leadership and personal development of selected high school students in Iwoa, Carter, Spotanski, , 1989

    96. Analysis of 4-H participation and leadership life skill development inTexas 4-H club members, Boyd, , 1991

    97. Social Emotional Competence of Pre-School Children: Relationship to Intelligence and Maturity, Brar, , 1992

    98. 행위통제검사(Action control Scale)를 이용한 과학영재 판별의 타당성 연구, 이현욱, , 2001

    99. Toward A differentiated model of giftedness and talent. In N. Colangelo, & G. A. Davis. (Eds.), Gagn?, "Toward A differentiated model of giftedness and talent. In N. Colangelo, , 1991

    100. Four-H and non-4-H participants' development of competency, coping and contributory life skills, Miller, J. P., "Four-H and non-4H participants' development of competency, , 1991

    101. 미국 규준에 비추어 본 우리나라 중학교 영재학생들의 리더쉽기술 수준, 차주환, 진석언, , 2004

    102. The cognitive-affective interaction model for enriching gifted programs. In J. S. Renzulli (Ed.), Williams, , 1986

    103. Predicting youth leadership and life skills among FFA members in Arizona, Colorado, and New Mexico, Dormody, Seevers, "Predicting youth leadership and life skills among FFA members in Arizona, , 1994

    104. Characteristics and experiences related to the leadership skills of agriculture studehts in college, McKinley, Stewart, Birkenholz, , 1993

    105. 부모의 가정교육방향 및 양육행동이 자녀의 심리·사회성숙에 미치는 영향, 박정희, 부모의 가정교육방향 및 양육행동이 자녀의 심리?사회성숙에 미치는 영향, , 2002

    106. Identification and assessment of the gifted. In J. F. Feldhusen, L. K. Van Tassel-Baska, & K. Seeley(Eds.), Baska, Feldhusen, "Identification and assessment of the gifted. In J. F. Feldhusen, , 1989

    107. Assessment of concurrent validity of the Leadership Skills Inventory with gifted students and their teachers, Karnes, D'Ilio, , 1988

    108. 과학영재와 일반학생의 문제발견의 차이 및 문제발견에 영향을 미치는 제변인 분석, 윤경미, 부산대학교 대학원, 부산대학교 박사학위논문, , 2003

    109. Constructs and models pertaining to exceptional human abilities. In A. Heller, F. J. Monks. & A. H. Passow(Eds.), Gagn?, "Constructs and models pertaining to exceptional human abilities. In A. Heller, , 1993

    110. Altering information to gain action control: Functional aspects of human information processing in decision making, Kuhl.J, Beckmann, , 1984

    111. Use of a behavior rating scale to aid in identification of developmentally and culturally different gifted children, Argulewicz, Elliott, , 1983

    112. Personal helplessness and action control: An analysis of achievement-related cognitions, self-assessments, and performance, Olbrich, Brunstein, "Personal helplessness and action control: An analysis of achievement-related cognitions, , 1985

    113. Action versus state orientation: Psychometric properties of the Action Control Scale(ACS-90). In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Kuhl, , 1994

    114. The dynamic theory of the anxiety behavior relation: A study of resistance and time allocation. In J. Kuhl & J. W. Atikinson (Eds.), Kuhl, Geiger, , 1986

    115. A review of theory and research found in selected experiential education, life skills development and 4-H. program impactsliterature, Wheatherford, Weatherford, "A review of theory and research found in selected experiential education, , 1985

    116. The relationship of personality and achievement to creativity and leadership behavior. In R. B. Cattell, M.D. Cattell, & E. Johns (Eds.), Johns, "The relationship of personality and achievement to creativity and leadership behavior. In R. B. Cattell, , 1984

    117. An information-processing perspective on intrinsic task involvement problem-solving and the complexity of action plans. In G. D'Ydewalle (Eds.), Kuhl, , 1985

    118. Volitional mediators of cognition-behavior consistency: Self-regulatory process and action versus state orientation. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Kuhl, , 1985

    119. In search of human effectiveness: Identifying and developing creativity. Bufallo: Creative Education Foundation. In A. Heller, F. J. Monks. & A. H. Passow (Eds.), MacKinnon, "In search of human effectiveness: Identifying and developing creativity. Bufallo: Creative Education Foundation. In A. Heller, , 1978

    120. 서울대생의 심리사회 성숙성의 비교 및 평가: 청소년의 가치기준과 심리사회 성숙성 요인과의 관계에 대한 발달심리적 연구, 황상민, 서봉연, , 1993

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼