대기업 사무직 근로자의 프로테우스적 경력 태도와 개인 및 조직 특성의 위계적 관계 = The Hierarchical Linear Relationship among Protean Career Attitudes, Individual Characteristics, and Organizational Characteristics of Office Workers in Large Corporations

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study lies in determining the protean career attitudes of clerical employees at large corporations in South Korea and the hierarchical relationship between individual characteristics and organizational characteristics. As for the instrument of investigation, surveys consisting of employees’ protean career attitudes, individual characteristics(demographic characteristics, occupational characteristics, ego-identity, adaptability), and organizational characteristics(organizational structure, fairness in personnel management, organizations’ perception of support, continuous learning culture) were used. 660 surveys were distributed to 33 large private corporations. From among these, surveys completed by 463 staff members from 31 large private corporations were used in the final analysis. As for data analysis, HLM 6.0 for Windows program were used to conduct the hierarchical linear model(HLM). The results of the present study were as follow. First, as for differences in protean career attitudes found among clerical employees at large private corporations, individual characteristic variables must be taken into consideration at first. However, because there were significant differences on the organizational level, differences in protean career attitudes must be explained also in terms of organizational characteristic variables. Second, from among individual characteristic variables, sex, educational background, position, voluntary department transfers, ego-identity, learning adaptability, and interpersonal adaptability had a significant effect on employees’ protean career attitudes. Third, from among organizational characteristic variables, organizational structure had a significant effect on employees’ protean career attitudes. Based on the results of this study we propose recommendations for follow-up research.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

이 연구는 우리나라 대기업 사무직 근로자의 프로테우스적 경력 태도와 개인 및 조직 특성의 위계적 관계를 구명하는 데 그 목적이 있었다. 연구 대상은 31개 대기업 사무직 근로자 463명이며, 측정도구는 프로테우스적 경력 태도, 개인 특성(인구통계학적 특성, 직업적 특성, 자아정체감, 적응성), 조직 특성(조직구조, 인사관리 공정성, 조직지원인식, 지속적 학습 문화)으로 구성된 질문지를 사용하였다. 분석 방법은 HLM 6.0 for Windows 프로그램을 이용하여 위계적 선형모형 분석(HLM)을 실시하였다. 이를 통한 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 대기업 사무직 근로자에게서 나타나는 프로테우스적 경력 태도의 차이는 일차적으로 개인 특성 변인을 고려할 필요가 있지만, 조직수준에서의 유의미한 차이가 발생함에 따라 조직 특성 변인을 통해서도 프로테우스적 경력 태도의 차이가 설명될 필요가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 개인 특성 변인 중 성별, 학력, 직위, 자의적 부서 이동, 자아정체감, 학습적응성, 대인관계 적응성이 프로테우스적 경력 태도에 유의미한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 조직 특성 변인 중 분권화된 조직구조가 프로테우스적 경력 태도에 유의미한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 연구의 결과를 토대로 후속연구 및 프로테우스적 경력 태도 증진을 위한 제언을 제시하였다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 박아청, "한국형 자아-정체감 검사개발에 관한 연구" 15 (15): 140-162, 1996

2 김교식, "학습에 대한 자기주도성이 직무태도에 미치는 영향" 고려대학교 2004

3 김강호, "중소기업에서의 학습지향성,학습행동,조직환경 및 학습성과의 인과관계" 2008

4 신유근, "조직행위론" 한국방송통신대학 1985

5 김선혁, "정규직 및 비정규직 노동자의 조직 및 직무에 대한 태도 차이:우리나라 은행 산업을 중심으로" 이화여자대학교 2009

6 이은형, "인적자원개발과 개인차원의 조직성과의 관계: 성별 및 유형별 차이를 중심으로" 한국여성경제학회 7 (7): 77-107, 2010

7 오윤정, "연구개발조직의 구조적 특성과 구성원의 헌신에 관한 연구:대기업 부설 과학기술 연구소를 중심으로" 이화여자대학교 1996

8 장계영, "대학생 진로적응성 척도 개발" 숙명여자대학교 2009

9 김순기, "기혼자녀가 지각하는 원가족의 정서적 건강성과 자아정체감이 결혼 후 심리적 안녕에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 경희대학교 2001

10 진규동, "기업의 학습조직 활동이 조직성과에 미치는 영향" 숭실대학교 2008

11 박영석, "근로의욕과 가치추구:경영혁신을 위한 하나의 제언" 7 (7): 226-244, 1993

12 유희경, "관광호텔 종업원의 책임단위와 업무 특성 인식과 두 특성이 직무몰입에 미치는 영향 분석" 한국호텔외식경영학회 18 (18): 113-132, 2009

13 박계두, "고용환경,조직특성,직무특성에 대한 인식과 직무불안정성에 관한 연구" 고려대학교 2001

14 Bliese,P, "Within-group agreement, non-independent and reliability. In Multi-level theory, research and methods in organization" Jossey-Bass 349-381, 2000

15 Baruch,Y, "Transforming careers:From linear to multidirectional career paths" 9 (9): 58-73, 2004

16 Hall, D. T., "The protean career:A quarter-century journey" 65 (65): 1-13, 2004

17 Hall,D.T, "The new protean career: Psychological success and the path with a heart. In The career is dead - Long live the career: A relational approach to careers" Jossey-Bass Publishers 15-45, 1996

18 Hall,D.T., "The new protean career contract: Helping organizations and employees adapt" 26 (26): 22-37, 1998

19 Briscoe,J.P., "The interplay of boundaryless and protean careers:Combinations and implications" 69 (69): 4-18, 2006

20 Briscoe,J.P.,, "The impact of the protean career on executive development practice: Evidence from 32 North American Companies" 2003

21 Hall,D.T., "Psychological success:when the career is a calling.Journal of Organizational" 26 (26): 155-176, 2005

22 Mirvis,P.H., "Psychological success and the boundaryless career" 15 (15): 365-380, 1994

23 Cabrera,E.F, "Protean organizations:Reshaping work and careers to retain female talent" 41 (41): 186-201, 2009

24 Vos,A.D., "Protean attitude and career success:The mediating role of self-management" 73 (73): 449-456, 2008

25 Briscoe, J. P, "Protean and boundaryless careers:An emperical exploration" 69 (69): 30-47, 2006

26 Segers,J., "Protean and boundaryless careers: A study on potential motivators" 73 (73): 212-230, 2008

27 Eby, L. T., "Predictors of success in the era of the boundaryless career" 24 (24): 689-708, 2003

28 Eigenberger,R., "Perceived organizational support.Journal of Applied" 71 (71): 500-507, 1986

29 Wayne,S.J., "Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective" 40 (40): 82-111, 1997

30 Fiol,C.M.,, "Organizational learning" 10 (10): 803-813, 1985

31 Aiken,M., "Organizational interdependence and intraorganizational structure" 33 (33): 912-932, 1968

32 Klein, K. J., "Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations, foundations, extensions, and new directions" Jossey-Bass 2000

33 Slater,S.F, "Market orientation and the learning organization" 59 (59): 63-74, 1995

34 Greenberg,J.H, "Managing behavior in organization" Prentice Hall 1999

35 Hall, D. T., "Long live the career. In The career is dead - Long live the career: A relational approach to careers" Jossey-Bass 337-345, 1996

36 Ployhart,R.E., "Individual adaptability(I-ADAPT) theory: conceptualizing the antecedents, consequences, and measurement of individual differences in adaptability. In Understanding adaptability: A prerequisite for effective performance within complex environments" Elsevier 3-40, 2006

37 Cappellen,T., "Global managers' career competencies" 14 (14): 514-537, 2008

38 Noe,R.A, "Employee Training and Development (3nd ed)" McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc 2005

39 Granrose,C.S.,, "Do psychological contracts include boundaryless or protean career?" 11 (11): 163-182, 2006

40 Nye,L.G., "Dimentionality and construct validity of the Perceptions of Politics Scale(POPS)" 53 (53): 821-829, 1993

41 Watkins, K., "Dimensions of the learning organization questionnaire" Partners for the learning organization 1997

42 Hall, D. T., "Careers in and out of organizations" Sage Publications 2002

43 Hall,D.T, "Careers in Organizations.Pacific Palisades" Goodyear Publishing Co 1976

44 Arthur,M.B., "Career success in a boundaryless career world" 26 (26): 177-202, 2005

45 Briscoe,J.P., "An alternative approach and new guidelines for practice" 28 (28): 37-51, 1999

46 Rhoades, L, "Affective commitment to the organization: The contribution of perceived organizational support" 86 (86): 825-836, 2001

47 Niles, S. G., "Adult career development in contemporary society. In Adult career development: Concepts, issue and practices" National Career Development Association 3-20, 2002