RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 원문제공처
        • 학술지명
        • 주제분류
        • 발행연도
          펼치기
        • 작성언어
        • 저자
          펼치기

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • 硏究開發體制를 감안한 通信서비스産業과 通信機器産業의 垂直的統合에 관한 硏究

        金永瑞 成均館大學校 韓國産業硏究所 1993 韓國經濟 Vol.20 No.1

        In this paper I attempt to formulate the behavior of both price and R&D activities in the telecommunications industry including service industry as well as equipment industry in order to analyze the effect of vertical integration between telecommunications industry and research institution. I assume in the model that the market for telecommunications service is monopolized while that of equipment is compare in Cournot-Nash form. Furthermore, I assume both industries has to provide the research fund to R&D institution according to the rule set by either the government regulation or their own optimal manner. It can be shown in the theoretical results that the closer both telecommunications industry and R&D institution are vertically integrated, the more the R&D fund is allocated to research institution, the better the welfare in those industries are increased through the cost reduction. In order to enhance the R&D activity in those industries, the R&D rule set by the government regulatory agent should be modified to their optimal R&D rule, which can improve more the competitiveness of telecommunication industry.

      • 韓國 合倂ㆍ買收市場의 特性과 政策方向

        張榮光 成均館大學校 韓國産業硏究所 1995 韓國經濟 Vol.21 No.2

        The primary objective of this study is to evaluate features and policies of the Korean M&A(merger and acquisition) market and suggest some policy implications for the market to function as an efficiency inducing and wealth redistributing device. An emphasis is placed on several major problems and their causes which has shaped the Korean M&A market characterized as non-competitive buyer's market. Several policy measures are proposed with regard to unfair distribution of merger gain against the acquired firms, inside trading, unreasonable taxation system and biased valuation practice of merger terms. This paper also discusses whether the Korean M&A market can function effectively as one of corporate governance systems like American market. This study claims that the corporate governance system monitored by non-framented financial institution we have oberved in German or Japanese market would be more effective, because the inefficient Korean capital market can not explicitly be related to corporate control market.

      • 한국의 산업정책 : 정책의 수단, 효과 및 방향

        이병기 成均館大學校 韓國産業硏究所 1995 韓國經濟 Vol.21 No.2

        This paper presents a survey of how Korea's industrial policy operates and what effects it has. It describes the specific instruments of the poicy and effectiveness of its instruments. Industrial policy is defined here as the totality of governmental policies undertaken with the ovject of changing the allocation of resources among industries from what it would otherwise be, or intervening in the industrial prganization of a specific industry, in order to promote a country's economic growth when unristricted functioning of the competitive market mechanism is seen to fail in serving that end. Korean industrial policy is a package of plicy instuments that developed and evolved to accelerate economic growth of certain key industies. The disignated industries had priority in acquiring rationed credits and foreign exchange, state investment fund, preferential tax treatments and supportive measures. The most important tool of such policy was the use of policy loans and tax measures. Policy loans accounted for 55.8% of total bank loans in 1992. The system of taxation in Korea has a general bias in favor of business investment, through such provisions as reduction and exemption from taxation of corporate income. A big tax amount which accounted to 16.8% of total corporate tax revenue exempted in 1989. Credit policy in Korea largely involves explicit and implicit control of interest rates. The export-priented, key industry, and large firms had strongly benefited from a variety of policy incentives. The measures employed in Promotional Acts enacted in the late 1960s and early 1970s provided legal backing for supporting for such priority sectors as machinery, shipbuilding, electronics, petrochemicals, iron and steel, non-ferrous metals, and textiles. In 1986, various Promotional Laws were integrated into the Industry Development Act. The novelty of the Industry Development Act compared to the Promotional Acts is its emphasis on rationalization programs with limited lifetimes. This paper surveyed about the effectiveness and the policy directions of industrial policy in Korea. According to the survey results, 47.0% of the surveyed firms reported the effectiveness of industrial policy instrument, among which the policy instrument for corporate investments was proved to be most effective. In future, especially, in preparation to the coming WTO regime, many firms expect technology-oriented industrial policy; 58.5% of the surveyed firms expect the government to support more the firm's efforts in developing new technology and 40.9% expect the support for the basic researches.

      • 炭素稅 賦課가 對 EU 輸出에 미치는 影響 : With Special Reference to the Primary Nonferrous Metals and Motor Vehicles Industry 鐵鋼産業 및 自動車産業을 中心으로

        李鍾垣,朴哲秀,姜憲 成均館大學校 韓國産業硏究所 1994 韓國經濟 Vol.21 No.1

        Under the Framework Convention on Climate Change, developed countries have to stabilize total carbon dioxide emissions by the year 2000 at 1990's level. One of the most effective option for mitigation of carbon diozede is to tax energy use, for example, carbon tax. This paper analyzes the effectiveness of carbon tax(primary nonferrous metals and motor vehicles industry) on the Korean export to EU. This sudy finds that carbon tax does negatively affect the Korean Industry a lot, at least in short run : assuming that carbon tax is designed as production tax on energy products based on their carbon content and equivalent to USD 10 per barrel, the production prices of primary nonferrous metals, motor vehicles and other trasportation machinary will incerease by 11.3%, 2.9% and 3.7% respectively and the export to EU will decrease by 19.8%, 7.8% and 12.3% respectively. In order to minimize the econmic cost from carbon tax, we must prepare the national action plan including energy saving, enhancement or energy efficiency, development of new energy technologies and renewable nergies, and so on, The action plan should be incentive system which can attract voluntary participations of private firms. Furtermore, in order to be effective, this plan must be harmonized with environmental policy and be given top priority over all the other policies.

      • 韓國 信用카드産業의 改善方案 : 政府規制와 事業者構造를 中心으로

        오무영 성균관대학교 한국산업연구소 2000 韓國經濟 Vol.27 No.--

        This research takes a deep insight into the problems and peculiarities of Korea's credit card industry on the standpoint of corporate structure and government policy. With the widespread usage of credit cards around the period of the 1988 Seoul Olympics, credit card companies became overburdened with high overhead and operational costs due to fierce competition among the companies to increase the cardholder and merchant base resulting in excessive card issuing and a closed merchant system. The excessive overhead is the result of the monopolized structure of the Korean credit card industry. The monopoly can be easily identified as there are 39 Million cards in circulation but only 27 companies of which only 7 are the primary credit card companies. These are BC Card Co., Kookmin Card, KEB Card, Samsung Capital, LG Capital, DongYang Amex, and DaeWoo Diner's Card. The average card portfolio for each credit card company per country are 63Thousand for The U.S. and 463Thousand for Japan. But Korea stands at 1,444Thousand cards per company. This type of credit card structure is a direct result of restrictions brought forth by the government preventing new companies to enter the market. Since the reformation of The Korean Credit Card Law in 1987, no other companies except banks were licensed to carry on credit card businesses allowing the 7 credit card companies to monopolize fees and customer services but competing excessively on card issuance. The monopolization among the 7 credit card companies went unnoticed but it would surely break-up when new companies with a variety of different corporate and operational structures enter the market and start up some fierce competition, In order to reform and improve the current credit card situation it is imperative that the strict regulations impeding new entrants to the market be lifted. It is also advisable that large corporations be given credit card licenses if they satisfy the requirements to enter the market and the problems associated with new entries be controlled through new entry criteria and post entry supervision. The Korean credit card industry is an important social part of the payments system and is playing a key role as the core of consumer financing. Accordingly, the government must deregulate and change its strict policies in order to develop the industry in the right direction and the credit card operators will have to do their best to increase efficiency on their own initiative.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼