RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 등재정보
        • 학술지명
        • 주제분류
        • 발행연도
        • 작성언어
        • 저자
          펼치기

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        Clinical statistics of gynecologic cancers in Japan

        Wataru Yamagami,Satoru Nagase,Fumiaki Takahashi,Kazuhiko Ino,Toru Hachisuga,Daisuke Aoki,Hidetaka Katabuchi 대한부인종양학회 2017 Journal of Gynecologic Oncology Vol.28 No.2

        Cervical, endometrial, and ovarian cancers, have both high morbidity and mortality among the gynecologic malignant tumors in Japan. The present study was conducted using both the population-based cancer registry and the gynecologic cancer registry to elucidate the characteristics of gynecologic malignant tumors in Japan. Based on nationwide estimates from the population-based cancer registry in Japan, the morbidities and mortality of cervical, endometrial, and ovarian cancers were obtained and used for analysis. Clinicopathologic factors for cervical cancer, endometrial cancer, ovarian cancer, including age, clinical stage, postsurgical stage, histological type, therapeutic strategy, and prognosis were retrieved from the gynecologic cancer registry published by the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology and used for analysis. The morbidities of cervical, endometrial, and ovarian cancers were 10,908, 13,606, and 9,384 women in 2012, respectively. The prevalence of endometrial cancer has significantly and consistently been increasing and represents the most common gynecologic malignant tumor in Japan. The mortalities of cervical, endometrial, and ovarian cancers were 2.1, 1.3, and 3.2 per 100,000 in 2012, respectively. In 2014, 52.2% of cervical cancer patients were classified as stage I, 22.5% as stage II, 10.2% as stage III, and 11.2% as stage IV. In addition, 71.9% of endometrial cancer patients were classified as stage I, 6.0% as stage II, 13.3% as stage III, and 7.5% as stage IV. Finally, 43.2% of ovarian cancer patients were classified as stage I, 9.1% as stage II, 27.6% as stage III, and 7.2% as stage IV. Twelve point five percent of ovarian cancer patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

      • KCI등재

        Efficacy of palonosetron plus dexamethasone in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and emesis in patients receiving carboplatin-based chemotherapy for gynecologic cancers: a phase II study by the West Japan Gynecologic Oncology Group (WJGOG 131)

        Shin Nishio,Satomi Aihara,Mototsugu Shimokawa,Akira Fujishita,Shuichi Taniguchi,Toru Hachisuga,Shintaro Yanazume,Hiroaki KOBAYASHI,Fumihiro Murakami,Fumitaka Numa,Kohei Kotera,Naofumi Okura,Naoyuki To 대한부인종양학회 2018 Journal of Gynecologic Oncology Vol.29 No.5

        Objective: Palonosetron is effective for the management of acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). While emetogenic carboplatin-based chemotherapy is widely used to treat gynecologic cancers, few studies have evaluated the antiemetic effectiveness of palonosetron in this setting. Methods: A multicenter, single-arm, open-label phase II trial was conducted to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of palonosetron in controlling CINV in patients with gynecologic cancer. Chemotherapy-naïve patients received intravenous palonosetron (0.75 mg/body) and dexamethasone before the infusion of carboplatin-based chemotherapy on day 1. Dexamethasone was administered (orally or intravenously) on days 2–3. The incidence and severity of CINV were evaluated using the patient-completed Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer Antiemesis Tool and treatment diaries. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients experiencing complete control (CC) of vomiting, with “no rescue antiemetic medication” and “no clinically significant nausea” or “only mild nausea” in the delayed phase (24–120 hours post-chemotherapy). Secondary endpoints were the proportion of patients with a complete response (CR: “no vomiting” and “no rescue antiemetic medication”) in the acute (0–24 hours), delayed (24–120 hours), and overall (0–120 hours) phases, and CC in the acute and overall phases. Results: Efficacy was assessable in 77 of 80 patients recruited. In the acute and delayed phases, the CR rates the primary endpoint, were 71.4% and 59.7% and the CC rates, the secondary endpoint, were 97.4% and 96.1%, respectively. Conclusion: While palonosetron effectively controls acute CINV, additional antiemetic management is warranted in the delayed phase after carboplatin-based chemotherapy in gynecologic cancer patients (Trial registry at UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000012806).

      • KCI등재

        A retrospective study for investigating the relationship between old and new staging systems with prognosis in ovarian cancer using gynecologic cancer registry of Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (JSOG): disparity between serous carcinoma and c

        Wataru Yamagami,Satoru Nagase,Fumiaki Takahashi,Kazuhiko Ino,Toru Hachisuga,Mikio Mikami,Takayuki Enomoto,Hidetaka Katabuchi,Daisuke Aoki 대한부인종양학회 2020 Journal of Gynecologic Oncology Vol.31 No.4

        Objective: International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging for ovarian,fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancers was revised in 2014. The aim of this study is to clarifywhether the revised FIGO2014 staging reflects the prognosis of patients with ovarian cancerby histological type in Japan. Methods: We extracted 9,747 patients who were diagnosed with ovarian cancer since 2004until 2008 and who could be classified into appropriate stages from the Gynecologic CancerRegistry of Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. These cases were analyzed afterrevision to FIGO2014 based on the pTNM classification. Results: Among stage I, the 5-year overall survival rate (5y-OS) in FIGO2014 was 94.9% instage IA, 92.3% in stage IC1, 86.1% in IC2, and 84.9% in IC3 with significant differencesbetween stages IA and IC1 (p=0.012), IC1 and IC2 (p<0.001). There was a significantdifference between stages IA and IC1 in clear cell and mucinous carcinoma but not in serousand endometrioid carcinoma. Among stage III, the 5y-OS was 75.6% in stage IIIA1, 68.9% inIIIA2, 58.6% in IIIB, and 44.4% in IIIC, with significant differences between stages IIIA2 andIIIB (p=0.009), IIIB and IIIC (p<0.001). Among stage IV, the 5y-OS was 43.1% in stage IVA*and 32.1% in IVB with a significant difference (p=0.002). Conclusion: The results suggest that changes in classification for stage III and stage IVare appropriate, but the subclassification for stage IC might be too detailed. There was adiscrepancy of prognosis by histological type between stage IA and IC1.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼