http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
THOMAS R. SEITZ 서울대학교 국제학연구소 1999 Journal of International and Area Studies Vol.6 No.1
This essay explores the exogenous economic and endogenous political factors motivating some of Southeast Asia’s authoritarian governments to strike out on a new, information-based development path. After examining the economic prospects and pitfalls involved in reorienting toward an information economy, this essay considers the question of how contradictions inherent in the economic changes and increased information flows mandated by this new development strategy might challenge these governments’ ability to continue their nation-building and legitimacy-building projects.
ECONOMIC STATECRAFT IN A GLOBALIZING ECONOMY:IS THERE AN INTERNATIONAL STANDARD FOR HUMAN RIGHTS?
SEITZ,THOMAS R. GRADUATE INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL AND AREA STUD 1999 Journal of International and Area Studies Vol.6 No.2
This essay considers the impact of economic globalization upon the development of an international standard of human rights performance. On one hand, the essay argues that economic globalization diminishes the impact of economic statecraft. Globalization, with its increased economic interdependence and diffusion of economic power has reduced the utility of states' efforts to effect target state compliance `from the top down' by manipulating flows of aid, trade and investment. One the other hand globalization of economic processes promotes `bottomup' pressure for regime compliance with human rights norms by facilitating and enhancing the efforts of non-state actors, particularly those comprising transnational human rights advocacy networks.
NATION-BUILDING IN THE INFORMATION AGE: LEGITIMACY AND THE 'INFORMATION ECONOMIES' OF SOUTHEAST ASIA
SEITZ,THOMAS R. GRADUATE INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL AND AREA STUD 1999 Journal of International and Area Studies Vol.6 No.1
This essay explores the exogenous economic and endogenous political factors motivation some of Southeast Asia's authoritarian governments to strike out on a new, information-based development path. After examining the economic prospects and pitfalls involved in reorienting toward an information economy, this essay considers the question of how contradictions inherent in the economic changes and increased information flows mandated by this new development strategy might challenge these governments' ability to continue their nation-building and legitimacy-building projects.
ECONOMIC STATECRAFT IN A GLOBALIZING ECONOMY - IS THERE AN INTERNATIONAL STANDARD FOR HUMAN RIGHTS?
THOMAS R,SEITZ 서울대학교 국제학연구소 1999 Journal of International and Area Studies Vol.6 No.2
This essay considers the impact of economic globalization upon the development of an international standard of human rights performance. On one hand, the essay argues that economic globalization diminishes the impact of economic statecraft. Globalization, with its increased economic interdependence and diffusion of economic power has reduced the utility of states’ efforts to effect target state compliance "from the top down" by manipulating flows of aid, trade and investment. On the other hand globalization of economic processes promotes ‘bottom-up’ pressure for regime compliance with human rights norms by facilitating and enhancing the efforts of non-state actors, particularly those comprising transnational human rights advocacy networks.
Consistency and Vote Buying: Income, Education, and Attitudes about Vote Buying in Indonesia
George Ikbal Tawakkal,Wisnu Suhardono,Andrew D. Garner,Thomas Seitz 동아시아연구원 2017 Journal of East Asian Studies Vol.17 No.3
This article examines ambivalence—the simultaneous holding of two or more conflicting values or beliefs about a political issue—among Indonesian citizens’ attitudes about vote buying. Using an original survey taken during the 2014 Indonesian elections, we analyze the factors related both to citizens’ normative views about vote buying and their willingness to accept gifts from candidates. A large number of citizens demonstrate ambivalence by viewing the practice as unjustified or corrupt and yet expressing willingness to accept money from candidates. We also examine the differential effects of education and income on these attitudes. Consistent with “demand side” theories of vote buying, low income creates economic pressure to accept money but does not influence normative attitudes about vote buying. Education, however, has a broader effect by influencing both normative attitudes and willingness to accept money. We consider implications of these results for Indonesian officials focused on reducing vote-buying behavior.