RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 원문제공처
        • 등재정보
        • 학술지명
        • 주제분류
        • 발행연도
        • 작성언어
        • 저자
          펼치기

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        RWON Study: The Real-World Walled-off Necrosis Study

        Ankush Pawar,Ujjwal Sonika,Manish Kumar,Sundeep Saluja,Siddharth Srivastava 대한소화기내시경학회 2021 Clinical Endoscopy Vol.54 No.6

        Background/Aims: The management of walled-off necrosis (WON) has undergone a paradigm shift from surgical to nonsurgicalmodalities. Real-world data on the management of symptomatic WON are scarce. Methods: Prospectively collected data of symptomatic WON cases were retrospectively evaluated. The treatment modalities usedwere medical management alone, percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) or endoscopic drainage (ED), or a combination of PCD andED. We compared clinical outcome among these modalities. Results: A total of 264 patients were evaluated. The most common indications for drainage were pain and fever. Of the patients,28% was treated with medical therapy alone, 31% with ED, 37% with PCD, and 4% with a combined approach. Technical successand clinical success were achieved in 93% and 91% of patients in the endoscopic arm and in 90% and 81% patients in the PCD arm,respectively (p=0.0004 for clinical success). Lower rates of complications (7% vs. 22%, p=0.005), readmission (20% vs. 34%, p=0.04),and mortality (4% vs. 19%, p=0.0012), and shorter hospital stay (13 days vs. 19 days, p=0.0018) were observed in the endoscopicgroup than in the PCD group. Conclusions: ED of WON is better than PCD and is associated with lower mortality, fewer complications, and shorter hospitalization.

      • KCI등재

        COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Test: Role in Screening Prior to Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

        Ashok Dalal,Ujjwal Sonika,Manish Kumar,Roshan George,Ajay Kumar,Siddharth Srivastava,Sanjeev Sachdeva,Barjesh Chander Sharma 대한소화기내시경학회 2021 Clinical Endoscopy Vol.54 No.4

        Background/Aims: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic has affected the gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopyunits globally owing to the risk of transmission. We present our data on the use of rapid antigen test (RAT) as a screening tool priorto endoscopy to prevent the transmission of coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent any GI endoscopic procedure from July 2020 to October2020 at a tertiary referral center in New Delhi, India. All patients underwent screening for COVID-19 using RAT, and endoscopywas performed only when the RAT was negative. The data are presented as numbers and percentages. Results: A total of 3,002 endoscopic procedures were performed during the study period. Only one endoscopic procedure wasperformed in a COVID-19 positive patient. A total of 53 healthcare workers were involved in conducting these procedures. Only2 healthcare workers (3.8%) were diagnosed COVID-19 positive, presumably due to community-acquired infection, during thisperiod. Conclusions: The COVID-19 RAT is easily usable as a simple screening tool prior to GI endoscopy during the COVID-19 pandemic.

      • KCI등재

        Current Status of Stem Cell Treatment for Type I Diabetes Mellitus

        Anupama Kakkar,Ashima Sorout,Mahak Tiwari,Pallavi Shrivastava,Poonam Meena,Sumit Kumar Saraswat,Supriya Srivastava,Rajan Datt,Siddharth Pandey 한국조직공학과 재생의학회 2018 조직공학과 재생의학 Vol.15 No.6

        BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus is a major health concern in current scenario which has been found to affect people of almost all ages. The disease has huge impact on global health; therefore, alternate methods apart from insulin injection are being explored to cure diabetes. Therefore, this review mainly focuses on the current status and therapeutic potential of stem cells mainly mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for Type 1 diabetes mellitus in preclinical animal models as well as humans. METHODS: Current treatment for Type 1 diabetes mellitus mainly includes use of insulin which has its own limitations and also the underlying mechanism of diseases is still not explored. Therefore, alternate methods to cure diabetes are being explored. Stem cells are being investigated as an alternative therapy for treatment of various diseases including diabetes. Few preclinical studies have also been conducted using undifferentiated MSCs as well as in vitro MSCs differentiated into b islet cells. RESULTS: These stem cell transplant studies have highlighted the benefits of MSCs, which have shown promising results. Few human trials using stem cells have also affirmed the potential of these cells in alleviating the symptoms. CONCLUSION: Stem cell transplantation may prove to be a safe and effective treatment for patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼