RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • Dynamic Coronary 320-Row CT Angiography Using Low-Dose Contrast and Temporal Maximum Intensity Projection: A Comparison with Standard Coronary CT Angiography

        Kojima Tsukasa,Yamasaki Yuzo,Kamitani Takeshi,Yabuuchi Hidetake,Shirasaka Takashi,Shimomiya Yamato,Kondo Masatoshi,Hamasaki Hiroshi,Kato Toyoyuki,Nagao Michinobu,Honda Hiroshi 아시아심장혈관영상의학회 2019 Cardiovascular Imaging Asia Vol.3 No.1

        Objective: The smallest diagnostically sufficient amount of contrast media (CM) should be used for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) to minimize the risk of contrast- induced nephrotoxicity in elderly patients with coronary artery disease. The purpose of this study was to propose dynamic-CCTA using a low dose of CM and temporal maximum intensity projection (TMIP) and to investigate its image quality compared to standard-CCTA. Materials and Methods: Participants comprised 30 patients with coronary artery disease who underwent dynamic-CCTA and standard-CCTA using 320-row CT. Dynamic-CCTA was continuously performed at mid-diastole throughout 15–25 cardiac cycles after bolus injection of CM [103 mg iodine/kg body weight (mgI/kg)]. TMIP-CCTA was reconstructed from three-phase dynamic-CCTA data, including a phase with peak enhancement of the ascending aorta. Standard-CCTA was performed using a standard CM dose (259 mgI/kg). Image quality of both TMIP-CCTA and standard-CCTA was analyzed. Results: The amount of CM used in TMIP-CCTA and standard-CCTA was 16.2±2.6 mL and 40.1±7.3 mL, respectively. The mean effective radiation dose was not significantly different between the two methods. Mean coronary attenuation was significantly lower for TMIP-CCTA than standard-CCTA [346.9±82.8 Hounsfield units (HU) vs. 455.4±75.3 HU, p<0.05]. Image noise was significantly lower for TMIP-CCTA than standard-CCTA (20.0±3.2 HU vs. 28.1± 3.6 HU, p<0.05). There were no differences in signal-to-noise ratio and visual assessment scores between the two methods. Conclusion: TMIP-CCTA can be performed using more than 50% less CM with the same image quality as standard-CCTA.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼