RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • SCOPUSKCI등재

        China`s Grand Strategy, the Korean Nuclear Crisis, and the Six-Party Talks

        ( Shale Horowitz ),( Min Ye ) 인하대학교 국제관계연구소 2006 Pacific Focus Vol.21 No.23

        North Korea has pursued a nuclear weapons capability for about two decades. Many diplomatic efforts have been made to convince or cajole the Northern regime to give up this quest - and all have so far failed. Since 2003, a new multilateral approach - the Six-Party Talks involving the Koreas, China, Japan, Russia, and the United States - has raised hopes anew. These hopes are based largely on China playing an active role. China has the potential both to guarantee North Korea`s security, and to impose and enforce a denuclearization agreement. We analyze China`s changing grand strategy and its implications for China`s Korea goals and policies. To Deng Xiaoping`s emphasis on China`s national interests, China`s third- and fourth- generation leaders have added a greater reliance on foreign and military policies to maintain domestic political support and legitimacy. This discussion indicates that China is currently more concerned to preserve the North Korean regime and prevent a second Korean War than to eliminate the North`s nuclear capability. Therefore, the Six-Party Talks are unlikely to succeed.

      • SCOPUSKCI등재
      • KCI등재

        Why China’s Leaders Benefit from a Nuclear, Threatening North Korea: Preempting and Diverting Opposition at Home and Abroad

        Shale Horowitz 인하대학교 국제관계연구소 2015 Pacific Focus Vol.30 No.1

        Since the Soviet Union’s collapse and North Korea’s subsequent deep economic crisis, China’s economic and diplomatic support has been vital to the Northern regime’s survival. Why has China provided this support? In foreign policy-making, China’s post-Deng leaders have increasingly prioritized domestic politics over national interests. This implies that China’s leaders are likely to view the North’s nuclearization, proliferation efforts, and controlled provocations as increasingly beneficial – as long as these activities stop short of triggering all-out war. China’s actions, as opposed to its statements, are consistent with this analysis.

      • KCI등재

        South Korea and Japan since World War II: Between Ideological Discord and Pragmatic Cooperation

        Shale Horowitz 인하대학교 국제관계연구소 2016 Pacific Focus Vol.31 No.1

        Since the end of World War II, relations between South Korea and Japan have gone through significant changes – from distant and hostile in the 1950s, to cooperative and increasingly close through about 2005, to the last decade of serious deterioration. Three frameworks are used to understand change and continuity in South Korea–Japan relations: a realist perspective emphasizing either structural military power relations or “revealed” patterns of military threat; an institutional perspective that emphasizes similarities or differences in political institutions; and an ideological regime-type perspective that includes ideologies as well as institutions as influences on government or leadership preferences. The third framework captures two types of ideological factors that have exerted significant influences on South Korea– Japan relations: the existence of a small range of competitive ideological regime types or government types specifying national ideals and national development roadmaps; and historical legacies of intense conflict, which tend to produce ideological and diversionary frictions that cause conflict to persist or recur. Only the last factor, the history issue, is readily subject to policy control: the best way forward to restore cooperative and stable relations is for South Korean and Japanese leaders to agree informally on truthful and empathetic norms governing historical judgments, and for Japanese political and opinion elites to agree informally to marginalize those that defy such norms.

      • KCI등재

        Keeping Instability at Bay: China’s Post-Deng Leaders and the Korean Crisis

        Shale Horowitz,Min Ye 한국학술연구원 2008 Korea Observer Vol.39 No.4

        Can China be relied upon to pressure North Korea to give up nuclear weapons and weapons-related technology, and to prevent North Korea from cheating on any agreement to do so? We argue that China’s post-Deng leaders are more concerned with domestic political legitimacy and intra-regime rivalries than their predecessors. Therefore, we expect their priorities to be avoiding a second Korean War and preventing the collapse of the North Korean regime. The North Korean nuclear capability and its geopolitical consequences, by contrast, do not appear to pose serious threats. China’s behavior toward the North before and during the Six-Party Talks is consistent with this reasoning. China seems concerned to prevent an economic collapse of the North Korean regime, and to prevent North Korea from miscalculating and acting in a way that will lead to a second Korean War. But, at the same time, China does not seem willing to make the kinds of credible threats that would force the North to denuclearize.

      • KCI등재

        Democracy with Economic Stagnation, and Democracy with Rapid Growth:Understanding the Indian Enigma

        Shale Horowitz,Deepti Sharma 한국학술연구원 2012 Korea Observer Vol.43 No.1

        India is a relatively poor country, and for the first 30 years after independence, saw a weak and deteriorating growth performance. Yet India’s democracy remained robust through almost all of this period. Economic growth in developing democracies is ordinarily mediocre. Yet India’s has been much more uneven — for long weak,and then for long strong. What explains these unusual outcomes?We argue that India’s structural diversity — her demographic size and poverty, combined with her complex caste, religious, linguistic,and economic cleavages — allowed the Congress Party to consolidate a dominant ideological and institutional position. This dominant position has only gradually eroded over recent decades. As a result,Congress Party leaders have played a decisive role in creating,preserving, and more briefly, threatening India’s democracy; as well as in taking India down two sharply contrasting economic policy paths.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼