http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : Roland Reichenbach (검색결과 3 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
( Roland Reichenbach ) 경북대학교 중등교육연구소 2019 Asia Pacific Journal of Educational Research Vol.2 No.2
Education as cultural cultivation includes the practice of caring for ideas. But what is the nature of ideas and what is their role in the educational process? How do ideas relate to ideals? And should (educational) ideas be “put into practice”? Is this possible, and desirable? It is argued in this contribution that we should we be more careful about the role of ideas in the process of education and our lives in general. The paper starts with commentaries on philosophical and etymological backgrounds, and then addresses the question of what makes ideas “successful”. Two apparently successful ideas are exemplary discussed, namely, the idea of the nobleness of the heart, and the idea of authentic living. Additionally, the topic is raised how to deal with educational ideas appropriately, and a plea for “modest ideas” is expressed.
-
Humanistic Bildung: regulative idea or empty concept?
Roland Reichenbach 서울대학교 교육연구소 2014 Asia Pacific Education Review Vol.15 No.1
The article focuses on the notion and humanistic ideal of self-cultivation and self-transformation, for which the term Bildung is/was traditionally used in German educational thought. It is argued that the idea of Bildung, understood as human development and end-in-itself, is not a German exclusivity. However, to understand the specificity of the notion, it may be necessary to consider that German Enlightenment—Aufklärung—in which the term gained a lot of importance, came later in history than French, English, and Scottish Enlightenment. Whereas in the early Western Enlightenment period, freedom was understood as an outward, definitely political concept, in later German Enlightenment the predominant understanding of freedom was characterized by a rather aesthetic dimension, not outward but internal freedom. The shift from a political understanding of Enlightenment—like in France, and also England or Scotland—to German inwardness (“Innerlichkeit”), as realized by the concept of Bildung, can be—at least to a certain degree—interpreted as a desire of German intellectuals at the time to escape from a brutal and on the whole disappointing post-revolutionary world to a place where man could seek secular perfection: an escape toward inwardness.
-
롤란트라이헨바흐 ( Roland Reichenbach ) 한국교육철학학회(구 교육철학회) 2010 교육철학연구 Vol.50 No.-
이 논문은 정치적 영역을 위한 정치적 영역에서의 진리 주장의 역할과 더불어, 민주적 삶의 양식을 위한 예의범절과 고상한 행동의 역할을 탐구하고자 한다. 한편으로, 시민 사회의 구성원들은 정치적 영역을 형성하고 경계지어주는 것으로서 진리 주장의 중요성을 인식하고 있다고 주장한다. 다른 한편으로는, 예의바르고 고상한 행동의 사회적 중요성에 초점을 맞춘다. 때로 고상한 행동은 진리의 엄격한 추구나 표현으로부터 거리를 둘 수 있는 있는 능력을 요구할 수 있다. 계몽주의와 후기 계몽주의의 관점은 민주적 삶의 양식을 위한 좋은 행동, 곧 시민적 예의의 중요성을 과소평가해왔다. 그리하여 ``시민적 예의``라는 용어는, 주로 역량(competence)의 문제에 초점을 두어 온 교육과 민주주의의 논의에서 그다지 주목을 받지 못했다. 이 논문은 인간이 함께 살아가기 위해 감수해야 할 희생들이라고 볼 수 있는 시민적 예의의 양면성을 부각시키고자 한다. 이 양면성은 시민적 예의가 예의범절, 거리두기, 그리고 친절하게 꾸미는 외양즉 일종의 속임 등을 의미한다는 사실에 근거하고 있다. The role of manners and decent behavior for democratic ways of living are explored, as well as the role of truth claims in and for the political realm. On the one hand, it is argued that members of civil societies recognize the importance of truth claims that shape and limit the political sphere. On the other hand there is a focus on the social significance of decent behavior. Decent behavior may require the ability of distancing oneself from rigid pursuits and expressions of truth. From enlightenment and post-enlightenment perspectives, the importance of good behavior for a democratic way of life is easily underestimated. The notion of civility therefore is not particularly prominent in the debate on education and democracy which usually rather focuses on questions of competence. The article tries to highlight the ambivalence of civility which may be construed as the sum of sacrifices human beings have to make for living together. This ambivalence is rooted in the fact that civility means manners, distance and friendly appearances, i.e. also deception.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
