INTERACTING FOCK SPACES AND THE MOMENTS OF THE LIMIT DISTRIBUTIONS FOR QUANTUM RANDOM WALKS

Ko, C.K.,Yoo, H.J. World Scientific 2013 INFINITE DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS QUANTUM PROBABILITY Vol.16 No.1

Uncertainty relation associated with a monotone pair skew information

Ko, C.K.,Yoo, H.J. Academic Press 2011 Journal of mathematical analysis and applications Vol.383 No.1

We derive a trace inequality leading to an uncertainty relation based on the monotone pair skew information introduced by Furuichi. As the monotone pair skew information generalizes the Wigner-Yanase-Dyson skew information as well as some other skew information, our result also extends a few known results on the uncertainty relations. Particularly it reduces to that of Luo, Yanagi, and Furuichi et al. in the special cases.

Schrodinger uncertainty relation and convexity for the monotone pair skew information

Ko, C.K.,Yoo, H.J. MATHEMATICAL INSTITUTE OF TOHOKU UNIVERSITY 2014 Tohoku mathematical journal Vol.66 No.1

Furuichi and Yanagi showed a Schrodinger uncertainty relation for the Wigner-Yanase-Dyson skew information, which is a special monotone pair skew information. In this paper, we give a Schrodinger uncertainty relation based on a monotone pair skew information, and extend the result of Furuichi and Yanagi. Moreover, we show that some monotone pair skew information becomes a metric adjusted skew information and therefore the convexity of it follows from known results.

Exploring the Association Between <i>DICER1</i> Mutations and Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma

de Kock, Leanne,Sabbaghian, Nelly,Soglio, Dorothé,e Bouron-Dal,Guillerman, R. Paul,Park, Byung-Kiu,Chami, Rose,Deal, Cheri L.,Priest, John R.,Foulkes, William D. Issued for the Endocrine Society by the Williams & 2014 The Journal of clinical endocrinology & metabolism Vol.99 No.6

THE TOURISM DILEMMA: EXAMINING CONFLICTS BETWEEN TOURISTS AND RESIDENTS

Florian Kock,Sebastian Zenker,Alexander Josiassen,Astrid Norfelt,Ricky Wilke 글로벌지식마케팅경영학회 2018 Global Marketing Conference Vol.2018 No.07

Traditionally, tourists spend their holidays in tourist spaces that provide the needed infrastructure for their experiences (i.e., hotels, restaurants, sight-seeing spots). However, nowadays tourists often occupy more residential space than in the past; this development is fuelled at least by two important trends in tourism. First, destination marketing organizations (DMO’s) increasingly seek to intertwine tourists‘ paths with local neighbourhood in order to create perceived tourist authenticity (e.g. the ‘localhood’ strategy of various city tourism organizations; Wonderful Copenhagen, 2017). Second, shared economy offerings, such as Airbnb, create tourist spaces in residential areas (Gutierrez et al., 2017). Both developments result in the integration of tourists into the residents’ living sphere, and anecdotal evidence indicates that this does not come without fraction between residents and tourists (e.g., Andereck et al., 2005; Gutierrez et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2013). Specifically, residential infrastructure as well as residents’ cultural identity may be impaired by tourism that digs its way through residential areas (Yang et al., 2013). As a consequence, residents often perceive urban tourism in their neighbourhood as ‘overtourism’ and a threat to their group, overall leading to low support for tourism development and negative attitudes towards tourists. This might negatively influence the tourism of the place, since the friendliness and hospitality of the local people are an important factor of the touristic experience (Kim, 2014). While the two mentioned developments of DMO’s ‘localhood’ strategy and Airbnb are likely to further fuel this trend, surprisingly little is still known about the perceptions of both tourists and residents, and the consequences for tourism performance. Against this background, the present research sets out to investigate the potential dilemma between the localized (and allegedly authentic; Lu, Chi and Liu 2015) tourist experience and the effect on residents‘ predispositions towards tourists and tourism itself. An initial question this research aims to answer is whether tourists indeed prefer and seek the authentic experience of ‘localhood’. Examining the issue of tourists’ perceived authenticity is crucial because it is the underlying assumption of DMO’s ‘localhood’ strategy. Second, this research sets out to investigate both residents’ and tourists’ perceptions of this development, mapping out potential consequences in a structural equation modelling approach. Specifically, this study aims to understand what drives residents’ perceptions of ‘overtourism’ and how this in turn affects their predispositions towards incoming tourists and tourism itself. In a third step, the consequences of these predispositions on tourists’ experience in the residential tourist space are analysed.

사흘르·드·코스타의 作品에서 뗄 ·아이른스피흘과 正義을 위한 투쟁

P. Kim Kock 한국외국어대학교 1975 한국외국어대학교 논문집 Vol.8 No.1

A FORMALIZED FRAMEWORK OF TOURISTS’ MENTAL PICTURES OF DESTINATIONS

Alexander Josiassen,Florian Kock 글로벌지식마케팅경영학회 2016 Global Marketing Conference Vol.2016 No.7

x

A FORMALIZED FRAMEWORK OF CONSUMER’S MENTAL PICTURES OF COUNTRY-OF-ORIGIN

Alexander Josiassen,Florian Kock,Stefanie Meß 글로벌지식마케팅경영학회 2016 Global Marketing Conference Vol.2016 No.7

The country-of-origin (COO) concept has obtained considerable attention by marketing researchers and managers since its introduction by Schooler in 1965. The relevance of this construct has been underlined by various studies indicating that a product’s COO serves as a signal for product quality, thus driving consumers’ product evaluations (Han & Terpstra, 1988), and consequently coloring their decision-making processes (Herz & Diamantopoulos, 2013). However, “despite a large body of research, country-of-origin effects are still poorly understood” (Verlegh & Steenkamp 1999, p. 521). This view is reiterated by Jaffe and Nebenzahl (2006) and Knight and Calantone (2001) who argue that academicians have so far not been able to provide an integrative theoretical framework capable of explaining the country-of-origin concept and the effects it has on behavioral intentions. The lacking consensus on a formalized and theory-based framework has resulted in various and often inconsistent views on the conceptualization of the COO concept (Laroche, Papadopoulos, Heslop & Mourali, 2005; Roth & Diamantopoulos, 2009). More specifically, several researchers view COO as a cognitive mental construct, consisting of associations, attributes and beliefs which consumers link to a particular manufacturing country (e.g. Gürhan-Canli & Maheswaran, 2000). However, other researchers propose to include not only cognitive but also affective components in the COO concept (e.g. Häubl, 1996). Further, studies also differ on the question whether COO should be viewed as a host of various beliefs (e.g. Martin & Eroglu, 1993) or rather as an overall evaluative attitudinal construct (e.g. Kotler, Haider & Rein, 1993). To complicate things further, existing studies also only loosely define whether COO should be conceptualized as a mental construct or rather as an effect that stems from a mental construct (Verlegh & Steenkamp, 1999). As a consequence, this conceptual ambiguity within the COO literature has yielded different operationalization for the measurement of the COO construct. As a consequence, and perhaps not surprisingly, the empirical work on COO has often resulted in conflicting findings (e.g. Pappu, Queste & Cooksey, 2006), limiting the advancement of the whole research area and making it harder for managers to apply it. Existing research (Josiassen, Lukas, Whitwell & Assaf, 2013) has addressed the conceptual ambiguity of COO by providing a framework for the macro-structure, explaining how different units of analysis relate to each other. However, researchers’ 1) fk.marktg@cbs.dkIntroduction The country-of-origin (COO) concept has obtained considerable attention by marketing researchers and managers since its introduction by Schooler in 1965. The relevance of this construct has been underlined by various studies indicating that a product’s COO serves as a signal for product quality, thus driving consumers’ product evaluations (Han & Terpstra, 1988), and consequently coloring their decision-making processes (Herz & Diamantopoulos, 2013). However, “despite a large body of research, country-of-origin effects are still poorly understood” (Verlegh & Steenkamp 1999, p. 521). This view is reiterated by Jaffe and Nebenzahl (2006) and Knight and Calantone (2001) who argue that academicians have so far not been able to provide an integrative theoretical framework capable of explaining the country-of-origin concept and the effects it has on behavioral intentions. The lacking consensus on a formalized and theory-based framework has resulted in various and often inconsistent views on the conceptualization of the COO concept (Laroche, Papadopoulos, Heslop & Mourali, 2005; Roth & Diamantopoulos, 2009). More specifically, several researchers view COO as a cognitive mental construct, consisting of associations, attributes and beliefs which consumers link to a particular manufacturing country (e.g. Gürhan-Canli & Maheswaran, 2000). However, other researchers propose to include not only cognitive but also affective components in the COO concept (e.g. Häubl, 1996). Further, studies also differ on the question whether COO should be viewed as a host of various beliefs (e.g. Martin & Eroglu, 1993) or rather as an overall evaluative attitudinal construct (e.g. Kotler, Haider & Rein, 1993). To complicate things further, existing studies also only loosely define whether COO should be conceptualized as a mental construct or rather as an effect that stems from a mental construct (Verlegh & Steenkamp, 1999). As a consequence, this conceptual ambiguity within the COO literature has yielded different operationalization for the measurement of the COO construct. As a consequence, and perhaps not surprisingly, the empirical work on COO has often resulted in conflicting findings (e.g. Pappu, Queste & Cooksey, 2006), limiting the advancement of the whole research area and making it harder for managers to apply it. Existing research (Josiassen, Lukas, Whitwell & Assaf, 2013) has addressed the conceptual ambiguity of COO by providing a framework for the macro-structure, explaining how different units of analysis relate to each other. However, researchers’Information about a COO is not only hold at the aggregated level, as reflected by CI, but may also be manifested through various, potentially unrelated beliefs, that individuals link with a particular country-of-origin. Attitude researchers widely agree on the notionInformation about a COO is not only hold at the aggregated level, as reflected by CI, but may also be manifested through various, potentially unrelated beliefs, that individuals link with a particular country-of-origin. Attitude researchers widely agree on the notionIn conclusion, we propose that the myriad of conceptual views on the COO concept can be theoretically integrated in a formalized model (Figure 1). Thus, instead of viewing the different conceptualizations on COO as conflicting, we show that they are indeed complementary, and can be understood by applying seminal psychology literature. The model also provides conceptual structure to the interactions between the three35 components, as well as enhancing our understanding how mental representations form behavioural intentions (Ajzen, 2001; Eagly et al., 1994).

儺儀·儺俗·儺戱 : 中國 儺文化 管窺

曲六乙 한양대학교 한국학연구소 1995 韓國學論集 Vol.27 No.-

한국 에어로빅스(Aerobics) 운동의 용어정의

이현정,곽형기 동덕여자대학교 2004 생활과학연구 Vol.9 No.-

Aerobics Exercise has introduced to Korea more than 30 years. Even though Aerobics has promoted and developed in areas of Physical Education, sports for all, and Elite sport, there are many terminological difficulties to determine the Aerobics Exercise. Because of that, I examined the brief history of Korea Aerobics, and explained the terms of Aerobics Exercise by three determinations. First, Aerobics Exercise was originated by Dr. Kenneth Cooper in 1968. Aerobic Exercise included some exercises such as walking, running, swimming, cycling which increase physical fitness. Second, Aerobics, originated Jackie Sorensen, is the exercise program with music and processes by warming up, main exercise and cool down. This Aerobics was introduced Korea in 1975, and steadily developed. Now, the word of Aerobic Dance has been disappeared, and the word of Aerobics became popular. Third, Sports Aerobics is a sport event. The first Sports Aerobics international championship took place in U.S. in 1984. The word of Sports Aerobics began to use in 1995 since the FIG(Federation International Gymnastic) approved Aerobics as an official event.