http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
남기곤,민태형 한밭대학교 산업과학기술연구소 2001 논문집 Vol.5 No.-
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the characteristics of Korean industrial relations. At the present time in much area of Korean society, the 'Post-modern' aspects coexist with 'Pre-modern' and 'Modern' aspects. In industrial relations Modern means Fordism and Post-modern means Post-fordism. In this article we find some facts ; 1) After the latter half of 1980's the Korean industrial relations systems were changed very rapidly. The oppressive systems were broken up and the traditional aspects of Fordism were spread more widely. 2) At the same time some aspects of Post-fordism appeared in the large firms. But in 1990's this trend became weaken because of the attacks of capitals.
남기곤 한밭대학교 2004 한밭대학교 논문집 Vol.21 No.-
This paper aims to analyze the cause of income inequality and the degree of inequality in Korea. Most of existing empirical studies have shown that the inequality index of Korea was not higher than that of other countries. But much caution is needed in that there are severe problems in Korean income data. Furthermore the inequality of wealth is more serious in Korea, and many people believe the wealth of the rich was not accumulated by rational methods. These kinds of problems are essential parts to make the desirable income distribution scheme in Korea.
남기곤 大田産業大學校 1995 論文集 Vol.3 No.-
The purpose of this paper is to analyze whether the consumption pattern of production workers’ households has changed after 1987. The main points of this paper are as follows. 1) The consumption differentials between production workers’ households and non-production workers’ households have been on the decrease after 1987. 2) From the analysis on the consumption of food and housing, I found that the absolute deterioration of production workers disappeared in 1990s. 3) The dissimilarity of the production workers consumption pattern between large-firm workers and small-firm workers has come out.
[일반논문] 고교평준화 제도가 학업성취도에 미친 영향 - 기존 연구 결과에 대한 비판적 검토
남기곤(Nam Ki-Gon) 비판사회학회 2004 경제와 사회 Vol.- No.64
고교평준화 제도가 학업 성적에 미치는 효과에 관한 기존 실증연구 결과들을 검토한 결과, 지금까지의 연구 결과로는 평준화 제도가 학업 성적에 부정적 영향을 미쳤다고 볼 수 있는 근거는 발견되지 않은 것으로 평가할 수 있다. 중소도시로 한정할 경우 평준화 지역의 성적 향상이 보다 낮을 가능성이 있고, 성적 집단별로는 상위권 집단에 비해 중하위권 집단에서 강한 긍정적인 효과가 나타날 가능성이 있다. 그러나 현재의 연구 결과로는 이러한 사실이 가능성 차원에 머물고 있을 뿐, 실제 그러한지 그리고 이러한 경향이 평준화 제도와 인과관계가 있는 것인지는 밝혀지지 않고 있다. 고교평준화 제도가 학업성적에 부정적인 영향을 미치고 있다는 주장을 강하게 제시하고 있는 김태종 외(2004) 역시, 사용하고 있는 자료의 불안정성으로 인해 그 결과를 신뢰하기 어렵다. This paper alms to examine the existing empirical results about effects of the Equalization Policy on the academic achievement in Korea. The consequence is that there isn't any clear evidence of negative effect of this policy. When the objects of analysts are limited to the small-size cities, it is possible for this policy to affect the negative effect And this policy tends to make an positive stronger influence to middle or low level students But these possibilities are nor clear yet Especially it is very unclear whether these symptoms are caused by the Equalization Policy or by other social factors Recently Taejong Kim et al. 2003 insist that this policy affect strong negative effect to the academic achievement But there is crucial problem in the data they used So the empirical results of this paper can't be accepted as reliable on More researches are requested.