http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
T-50 고등 훈련기 엔진/기체 적합성 검증을 위한 추진계통 비행시험
이상효(Sang-Hyo Lee),정인면(InMyon Jeong),정주현(JooHyun Jung),심재광(JaeKwang Shim),강성수(SungSoo Kang),박성환(SungHwan Park),한병학(ByoungHak Han),문형래(HyungRae Moon),차재병(JaeByoung Cha),이부일(BooIl Lee) 한국항공우주학회 2007 韓國航空宇宙學會誌 Vol.35 No.10
항공기를 개발함에 있어 기체를 구성하는 계통의 성능이 항공기 요구도를 만족하는 수준으로 발휘되는지 확인하는 것이 중요하다. 특히, 엔진을 포함한 추진계통은 항공기를 구성하는 구성품 중 중요한 계통으로서, 추진계통과 기체와의 통합성을 검증하는 것이 항공기 개발에 있어 필수적 요소이다. T-50 고등훈련기 체계개발 시 추진계통 검증을 위해 엔진 공중재시동 시험 및 엔진 축마력 시험, backup throttle기능 시험 등의 다양한 비행시험을 수행하였으며, 이와 같은 항목의 비행시험을 통하여 T-50 고등 훈련기의 추진계통이 기체에 적합하게 설계/장착되었음을 확인하였다. 본 논문에서 추진계통 비행시험 항목에 대한 설명 및 시험 절차, 결과를 제시하였으며, 본 논문의 내용이 차후 타 항공기 개발 시 추진계통 관련 비행시험을 준비하는 과정에서 참고가 될 수 있을 것으로 기대한다. It is important during FSD(Full Scale Development) period to verify whether the aircraft system function meets the aircraft requirements and functional performance. Especially, the functionality of the integrated propulsion system should be verified to evaluate the compatibility with aircraft. Various flight tests such as the engine airstart test, the engine horsepower extraction test, the backup throttle functionality test had been performed to evaluate the engine/aircraft compatibility with T-50 during FSD period. Through such flight tests, it was confirmed that the propulsion system of T-50 was properly designed and installed to the aircraft. This paper shows description on each flight test item, test procedure and test results. It is expected that this paper could be a reference for preparing the propulsion flight test in other aircraft developments.
Bongsam Choi,Heesu Kim,Sunhwi Bang,Byunggwan Kim,Jaekwang Shim 한국전문물리치료학회 2023 한국전문물리치료학회지 Vol.30 No.1
Background: Equating is a statistical procedure used to create a common measurement scale across two instruments. Item-level information should be taken into consideration so that scores can communicate interchangeably across the instruments. Objects: To investigate a common measurement scale across two health-related quality of life questionnaires (HRQOL) applied to various cancer survivors who underwent palliative care in healthcare institutions. Methods: A total of 139 cancer survivors who underwent palliative care were recruited from two rehabilitation hospitals and an oriental medicine hospital. Participants consisted of various cancer survivors who presented to the sites for palliative care. They were asked to fill out Kore-an versions of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) and EuroQOL-5 dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaires following the palliative care. For the item level comparison, the Rasch rating scale model was used to investigate how participants regarded individual test items of two instruments in relation to item difficulty calibrations. Results: All items except the three items fit the Rasch model. One item (anxiety/depression) of the EQ-5D and two items (dependence on medical aids and negative feelings) of the WHO-QOL-BREF are misfit. The WHOQOL-BREF targets the survivors well, while the EQ-5D is able to target the survivors with lower HRQOL levels with some ceiling effects. By inspecting the item difficulty calibrations of the two instruments, five items of the WHOQOL-BREF are selected as common items in relation to the EQ-5D. These five items are considered compatible with each other. Differential item functioning (DIF) analysis reveals that the healthcare item of the WHOQOL-BREF vs the self-care item of the EQ-5D exhibits significant DIF. Conclusion: Findings suggest that one paired item should be taken into consideration when equating the WHOQOL-BREF and the EQ-5D applied to cancer survivors who underwent pal-liative care.