http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : Allan Back (검색결과 4 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
( Allan Back ) 국제태권도학회 2017 Journal of the International Association for Taekw Vol.4 No.1
Many doctrines in the martial arts are historically false, such as the superhuman prowess of the founders and masters of a martial art, and, more to the point here, the formation of Taekwondo. Yet, although I do largely question the truth of many claims made in these teachings, based upon the available historical evidence. However, at the same time I do not want to disparage these doctrines. Rather, I want to treat them as myths. Myths serve important functions in the martial arts as in other areas of our lives. They provide motivation, ideals, and orientation into tradition. I shall discuss some of these functions as they relate to Taekwondo. When it comes to pedagogy, the issue of how factual the material to be presented should be arises. Strictly speaking, from the perspective of the current field of knowledge in question, a lot of the claims made in textbooks are false. Simplified theory is presented as fact, many controversies in the field are ignored, and the science is outmoded. This happens by necessity: a beginner cannot absorb the full field. Fur-thermore, education has more functions than the inculcation of technical skill. As pedagogy in-cludes socialization into cultural traditions as well, myth will also have its functions there too. The same is true for teaching Taekwondo. Overall, this investigation focused on the question of how much truth and reality should be integrated into the teaching and understanding of myth. Certain Asian cultures seem comfortable with more realism than Western ones. I conclude that the discrepancy is based on differing aesthetic standards: the Western demanding completion and perfection of the artifact and the Asian admiring artifacts with imperfections and incompleteness.
-
( Allan Back ) 국제태권도학회 2017 International Symposium for Taekwondo Studies Vol.2017 No.-
Many doctrines in the martial arts are historically false, such as the superhuman prowess of the founders and masters of a martial art, and, more to the point here, the formation of Taekwondo. Yet, although I do largely reject the truth of many claims made in these teach ings, based upon the available historical evidence, at the same time I do not want to dispar age these doctrines. Rather, I want to treat them as myths. Myths serve important functions in the martial arts as in other areas of our lives. They provide us motivation, ideals to strive for, an orientation into a tradition. I shall discuss some of these functions. When it comes to pedagogy, again the issue of how factual the material to be presented should be arises. Strictly speaking, from the perspective of the current field of knowledge in question, a lot of the claims made in textbooks are just false. Simplified theory is presented as fact; many controversies in the field are just ignored; the science is outmoded. This happens by necessi ty: a beginner cannot absorb the full field. Furthermore, education has more functions than the inculcation of technical skill. As pedagogy includes socialization into cultural traditions as well, again myth will have its functions there too. The same is true for teaching Tae kwondo. In conclusion, I shall focus on how much truth and reality we should insist upon in teaching and in our understanding of myth. Certain Asian cultures seem comfortable with more realism than Western ones. I conclude that the discrepancy is based on differing aesthetic standards: the Western demanding completion and perfection of the artifact; the Asian admiring artifacts with imperfections and incompleteness. I opt for the realism of the latter.
-
-
RISS연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
