RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재후보

        周作人의 ‘雜學’과 지식의 통섭

        홍준형(Jun-Hyong Hong) 중국문화연구학회 2011 중국문화연구 Vol.0 No.18

        After the 20th century, the new intellectuals in China had a critical mind in common, which was how to get out of the traditional academic thoughts and secure the self ruling academic independence liberated from ethics. Zhou zuoren also sought to make up a new academic system through securing its independence, pointing out how detrimental the traditional Chinese academy was, which had been subjected to ethics. On the other hand, however, he didn’t deny the connection itself between academy and ethics. He thought that academy which studies human beings and objects could hardly be separated from ethics and must not be separated from ethics in that the latter was a total form of what human beings accumulated as human culture passed through a long time. But he believed that what was problematic was that academy must not be completely subjected to ethics as it had been or be treated as a byproduct for ethics, and that academy should be able to make contributions to creating human beings’ new future oriented ethics in the end through mutual communications and exchanges, while sustaining its original independence. In order to achieve his idea, Zhou zuoren tried to practice a series of new academies which he himself called ‘Za Xue(雜學)’. What he called sundry learning had the relative meaning compared with so called ‘authentic academy’ or ‘mainstream academy’, through which he endeavored to pull himself out of the frame of mainstream academy previously subjected to ethics, draw up new academic areas based on individuals’ independent consciousness and knowledge, and lay the foundations for a new human academy through communications and exchanges among each academic area. He tried to ultimately examine the root of China’s national character by exploring the Chinese people’s daily lives, customs, and folk art through the in depth study of anthropology and folklore, and establish new viewpoints towards children and juvenile literature on the basis of scientific reason while criticizing universal recognition of children in traditional societies by studying mythology and fairly tales. In addition, he intended to go beyond the limits of human beings oriented thoughts by studying Western sex psychology and biology, and think and form the relationship itself between human beings and objects in a fresh way through scientifically understanding human beings and observing objects themselves. He made efforts to introduce to China Japanese culture through the research of Japan and, in particular, the arts and aesthetics in daily living which was peculiar to Japan as he was greatly interested in them. Moreover, he read China’s idea history from a new point through the research of writing methods during the Ching Dynasty and tried to regard it as a foundation for help past and present communicate with each other through having a dialogue with the present and for historic recognition. On top of that, he made great achievements in translating foreign literature and ancient Greek mythology and had interests in studying Buddhist scriptures and medical history and went on with in depth researches.

      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재

        1920년대 초 문학 생태계의 구축과 문화 기획 - 상무인서관 시기 정전둬의 출판·미디어 활동을 중심으로

        홍준형(Hong, Jun-hyong) 한국중어중문학회 2020 中語中文學 Vol.- No.80

        This paper discussed the relationship between Zheng Zhenduo’s cultural planning and the Literary ecosystem reorganization in the early 1920s, focusing on the publication of the Society for Literature Researches’ series and activities in Literature Every Ten Days. The special emphasis here was on the reconstruction of the Literary ecosystem based on Post May Fourth Era publishing and media, and the appearance and role of Zheng zhenduo as a cultural planner who actively participated in this process. What made Zheng Zhenduo successful as one of the leaders of the Society for Literature Researches and one of the most prominent planners of the New Literature camp was to clearly predict and lead the change and flow of the Post May Fourth Era’s Literary Field with publishing and media platforms. In this process, The Commercial press played a crucial role. Through this meeting, Zheng Zhenduo was awarded The Commercial Press as a strong sponsor of Society for Literature Research, and as an editor, secured an important platform to put his cultural plan into action. It was also the secret that the Society for Literature Research was able to continue for a relatively long time, trying to find a space for independent discussion without being buried in the interests of the publishers, while increasing the influence with the support of The Commercial Press. Furthermore, it was also a pioneering attempt to reorganize the Literary ecosystem centered on New Literature, clearly understanding the media characteristics and differences between Series books and magazines, and distributing them according to the needs and realistic understanding of cultural movements. Indeed, this interconnection between media, from magazines to series books, has become a major model for the production of new literature and has had a significant impact on the reorganization of the literature market.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼