http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
수첨 포스파티딜콜린을 이용한 콜라겐 리포좀의 제조 및 특성
최영원 ( Young Won Choi ),장부식 ( Boo Sik Jang ),정노희 ( Noh Hee Jeong ) 한국유화학회 2012 한국응용과학기술학회지 Vol.29 No.2
콜라겐 성분을 최대로 보호하면서 안정하게 체내로 흡수 될 수 있도록 고순도 수첨 포스파티딜콜린과 용매사출방법을 이용하여 콜라겐 리포좀을 제조하였다. 리포좀 막의 안정성을 높이기 위해 포스파티딜콜린에 콜레스테롤을 혼합하여, 에탄올과 프로필렌글리콜 혼합용매에 용해하였으며, 이온의 안정화를 위하여 PBS Buffer를 사용하였다. 다양한 변수에 의해 제조된 콜라겐 리포좀의 특성은 동적광산란광도계(DLS), 주사현미경(SEM), 편광현미경(POM)로 분석하였다. The collagen-liposomes were prepared with hydrogenated phosphatidylcholine and by solvent injection method for maximum protection and stable absorption of collagen into the body. Cholesterol was added to phosphatidylcholine to increase the stability of liposome membrane. The mixture was dissolved in ethanol and propylene glycol and PBS Buffer was used to Stabilize ions. The properties collagen-liposome were analyzed by DLS, SEM and POM.
Performance Model을 이용한 무기체계 운용화면 GUI 사용성 평가 및 개선에 대한 연구
전동주(Dong-Ju Jeon),이승률(Seung-Ryool Lee),최영원(Young-Won Choi),이혜원(Hye-Won Lee),김두정(Doo-Jung Kim) 한국산업경영시스템학회 2016 한국산업경영시스템학회지 Vol.39 No.3
The recent development of modern weapon system by SOS (System of System) has required users to have more exact decision making. It is possible to achieve the control of complex weapon system more efficiently and effectively by increasing usability. Accordingly, many studies on graphical display have been conducted for several years in the field of HCI (Human Computer Interaction) and GUI (Graphic User Interface), starting from its design stage. Therefore, this paper focuses on evaluating the system GUI usability and analyzing several important points based on performance model, which is a tool for the evaluation and the improvement of service quality. Performance Model, the main focus of this study, reflects user expectations (which is defined as user importance in this paper). The study consists of four steps. First, 34 checklists are drawn from the existing studies related to GUI usability evaluation by using a heuristic method, and then the checklists are matched with 11 weapon system design factors. Next, the study evaluates the importance of GUI element and the usability of weapon system “A” with the checklists twice respectively. Third, the performance of user importance ( ?? ) and the performance of usability ( ?? ) are calculated by modifying a numerical formula for normalization in this step. Finally, the study compares the approach it takes and the existing usability evaluation method, demonstrating that there is a significant difference between the two methods as a result. In addition, 4 improvement factors are suggested for weapon system “A” as “Shortcut” and “Description of Abbreviation,” and so on. Although it is necessary to conduct more studies for higher reliability and validity of the results, this study is meaningful considering it takes a new point of view.