http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 조성산(Sung-San Cho) (검색결과 64 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
조성산,박승호,Cho, Sung-San,Park, Seung-Ho 대한기계학회 2002 大韓機械學會論文集A Vol.26 No.11
Finite element technique considering adhesive forces is proposed and applied to analyze the behavior of elastic hemispherical asperity adhesively contacting the plane surface of semi -infinite rigid body. It is demonstrated that the finite element model simulates interfacial phenomena such as jump -to-contact and adhesion hysteresis that cannot be simulated with the currently available adhesive contact continuum models. This simulation aiso provides valuable information on contact pressure, contact region and stress distributions. This technique is anticipated to be utilized in designing a low-adhesion surface profile for MEMS/NEMS applications since various contact geometries can be analyzed with this technique.
-
조성산(Cho Sung san) 경인교육대학교 기전문화연구소 2008 기전문화연구 Vol.34 No.-
김창협은 훗날 낙론계의 종장으로 인식되면서 그의 사유는 노론 전반에 중요한 영향을 끼쳤다. 김창협 학문의 형성과점을 살펴보면 우선 김상헌・송시열을 통해서 주자학과 의리학 학풍에, 나성두・조성기・이단상을 통하여 邵雍 象數學의 학문성향에, 중국으로부터 전래된 서적들을 통하여 최신 중국 학술동향에 영향을 받았다. 이러한 것이 종합되어 김창협의 학문이 형성될 수 있었다. 이처럼 김창협의 사유 형성에는 다양한 연원들이 존재했으며, 그것은 김창협의 학문이 복합적이고 다층적이게 된 주요 원인이었다. 김창협의 성리학은 이기론과 지각론으로 대별할 수 있다. 그는 기존의 학설을 비판하면서 이기와 심성의 관계를 재정립하였다. 이를 통해서 새로운 인간관을 세웠다. 이는 기존의 보수적인 입장을 견지하면서도 새로운 변화에 적응하고자 하는 문제의식 속에서 나왔다. 이러한 김창협의 학풍은 그의 학문이 가졌던 다층성을 말해 준다. 이러한 다층적인 김창협의 학문은 현실인식에도 반영되었다. 단선적인 반청 분위기가 팽배해 있었던 시대에 오랑캐가 밉다고 해서 중국에 남아있는 중화의 여풍까지 버려서는 안된다는 18세기 후반 북학론과 흡사한 주장을 펼치기도 하였다. 또한 봉건・군현제 논의를 통해서 국정운영의 입장도 보여주었다. 그는 봉건제를 私로, 군현제를 公으로 규정하였으며 군현제가 가지고 있었던 현명한 인재 등용의 측면에 주목하였다. When seen from ongm of academic world of Kim, Chang-Hyup, we can find out what kind of factors have affected formation of his academic world. He had been affected by the doctrines[teachings] of Chu Hsi and the doctrines[teachings] of Ui-Ri義理 through academic trend of Kim, Sang-Hun and Song, Shi-Yeol, and by Shao Yung s Learning of Images and Numbers through that of Na, Seong-Doo · Cho, Sung-Gi·Lee, Dan-Sang. The books handed over to Korea from China had influenced formation of his own world of Kim, Chang- Hyup. These had become part of his own academic world of Kim, Chang-Hyup. Kim, Chang-Hyup criticized Yi yi李珥 s theory of li-tong-gi-guk 理通氣局 and emphasized the meaning of li理 in yi-gi theory. Through this work, he also raised the view of human nature as fundamentally good 性善 and tried to explain various figures of human beings in multiple angles. In the theory of consciousness of Shirni心, he criticized both Buddhism and the doctrines of Wang Yangming陽明學 based upon the principle of division of Shim心· Seong性, with an intention of ensuring a space of Shim and raising the values of Shim. This multiple layer of academic world of Kim, Chang-Hyup was reflected in the recognition of reality. He also proposed a theory identical to Northern Leaming in the latter half of 18th century with tight atmosphere of anti-Qing dynasty spirit throughout the nation. In addition, he showed his position over national operation with feudal(Ponggŏn封建) and counties·prefectures(Gunhyun郡縣) System discussion and proposed a direction of statecraft through Gyu-Mo-Chaek規模策.
-
-
-
조성산(Cho Sung-san) 고려사학회 2009 한국사학보 Vol.- No.36
It features that research on hun-min-jeong-eum訓民正音 had been made mostly led by Soron少論 Faction in the latter half of Choson Dynasty. That is almost triggered by academic background whose research mostly focused upon Hwang-geuk-gyung-seh-suh皇極經世書. In addition to this, they had a unique recognition of Choson's Chinese character sound. That is, there remained old and ideal sound of ancient times, within Chosen's Chinese character sound, and some of them asserted that Chosen's Chinese character sound should be made as righteous sound(jeong-eum, 正音) instead of Chinese sound that had bee contaminated by a barbarian's sound. The recognition to such Choson's Chinese character sound shows well their Sino-centralism which tried to internalize that of ancient times that they had through Gija(箕子). On top of such recognition, Shao yong(邵雍)'s Hwang-geuk-gyung-seh-suh(皇極經世書) added to the understanding of phonology · phonetics to them, they started to happen to pay interest to hun-min-jeong-eum as a tool to completely restore the past righteous sound(jeong-eum). Therefore, what is known as research on the past hun-min-jeong-eum, that is to say, means, strictly speaking, a way to restore old sound, righteous sound (jeong-eum) through hun-min-jeong-eum rather than a research itself on hun-min-jeong-eum. This can be inferred from Hwang-geuk-gyung-seh-suh which they deemed as a model. Soron's phonology research, I believe, was strongly to reveal Sino-centralism consciousness of ancient times in its preception of a goal, through hun-min-jeong-eum as a means. In this process, they could make a deeper research on functions of hun-min-jeong-eum, and they, further, advanced into guessing possibility of turning sound of hun-min-jeong-eum into letters.
-
-
18~19세기 조선 봉건 · 군현제 논의의 역사적 전개
조성산(Cho, Sung-san) 역사학회 2017 역사학보 Vol.0 No.236
This article attempts to explore the social context of the fengjian (feudal system) vs. junxian (rational bureaucracy) debate of the eighteenth and nineteenth century Chosŏn intellectuals community. In the period around the eighteenth century, some intellectuals paid attention to the doctrine of junxian argued by Liu Zongyuan. They insisted that effectively managed meritocracy was the greatest advantage of the junxian system. This claim of junxian system corresponded with the orientation of monarchical rule of power, which was called as t’angp’yŏng politics. However, a centralization of political power, which has been rapidly progressing after t’angp’yŏng politics, brought about the collapse of the local literati. In the course of this process, debates emerged to advocate for feudalism. Such advocacy acknowledged hereditary statuses, and predicted the decentralization of statecraft, with arguing the economic stability of the local literati and advancement them into a wide office. The feudalism of this period reflected the social position of the subversive local literati.
-
趙成山(Cho Sung-san) 역사학회 2009 역사학보 Vol.0 No.202
The intelligent in the latter half of Choseon Dynasty put forth Sino-Centralism, but there was a little difference in its contents and application. Noron proposed culture of Song Dynasty as standard for Sino-Centralism with a slogan of Dae-myeong-eui-ri(對明義理). That was the reason why they hardly paid attention to ancient history largely and failed to evade from attitude to narration of history depicted by previous historians in a large scale. They emphasized relation to the culture of Song Dynasty represented by the doctrines of Chu-tz suggesting that Choseon would be able to maintain its subjectivity of its culture. On the other hand, Saran paid more attention to culture of Gija Choseon that had been inherited from long time ago and proposed it as standard for Sino-Centralism. In that way, they tried to internalize Sino-Centralism of ancient times inherited ever since Gija Choseon Era into our history. As a result of that, they happened to pay close attention to ancient history. This kind of research on ancient history originally came from unique interpretation of Sino-Centralism by Soron, however it caused a certain result unintentionally that excelled Sino-Centralism. At the beginning, they tried to complete and refine Sino-Centralism that they interpreted on their own, however they came to start finding national subjectivity beyond Sino-Centralism inside of them without notice. That is because their study on ancient history might have structural similarity in common with nationalism in which the nation's culture is respected if China is made shown. This situation has hardly nothing to do with the reason that Shin, Chae-ho newly discover and highly praise Ryu, Deuk-gong Lee, Jong-hwi. The history of medieval Sino-Centralism encountered that of modem nationalism by accident through this flow of course.
-
조성산(Cho Sung-San) 호서사학회 2010 역사와 담론 Vol.0 No.56
Jung, In Bo was mostly devoted to doing research on national studies(國學) while being affected by the trend of modern nationalism such as Zhang Byung-rin, Yang, Gye-cho, Wang Yang-myung, etc. But he also had a learning background centered upon Soron(少論)'s academic tradition. To completely understand his national studies, we have to grasp the meaning of unique learning system of Soron and Sobuk(小北) political faction in the latter half of Chos?n Dynasty. Among a great number of scholars of the Chinese classics with background of traditional learning, his learning background couldn't be ignored that had led Jung, In Bo to successful performance. Even though Soron's learning system related to modern national studies was not bigger than that of Japan, it had many functions in common that could be united into discourse about modern nationalism that emphasized the nation. Soron's learning system focused upon issues of national territory, righteousness between sovereign and subject. keeping up with respecting national order. In addition, even though it was different from the goal in modern times, it did research on Hunminjeongeum(Korean Alphabet), while making the society develop ideology of unification using tangpyung(蕩平) policy. This kind of learning background enabled Jung, In Bo to successfully respond to contemporary intellectual trend changed at the time as a scholar of the Chinese classics. I assume that academic tradition of Soron faction played a significant role in his absorbing research tradition of study of culture and heritage of the country of China and Japan. The purpose of this study is to find out medieval possibilities of modern nationalism that were shown in the learning of Soron and investigate how it was changed and inherited to Jung, In Bo. From the viewpoint of Jung, In Bo, I believe that he tried to design 'nation state' that played the most important factor in the formation of modern nation and gain independence more than anything else. That's the reason which he paid attention to separating his side from others. In that way of his separation of his side from others, he was committed to carrying out a clear historic task that he should protect Korean nation of a historic community from the Japanese control. That point was the place which he changed medieval studying of Soron faction into modern national studies.
-
스콜라연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
