http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 조경애 (검색결과 46 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
曺敬愛,柳德桓 한국의류학회 1982 한국의류학회지 Vol.6 No.1
This article aims to determine the interrelation among exfoliation strength, the repeated laundry number, the coefficient of friction and the cover factor about the fusible interlining produced by using different amount resin. The practicality of stiffness and warmth of the fusible interling were examined. The results are summarized as follows: 1) As a factor that affecting the exfoliation strength of fusible interlining, the coefficient of friction and the cover factor about the fusible interlining produced by using different amount resin. (2) Regardless of the weight of the resin, the exfoliation strength of fusible interlining declined gradually as the repeated laundry number increased. This tendency arises much more in the case of the filament yarn fabric than in that of the spun yarn fabric. The stability of the exfoliation strength was better, regardless of the increase of the repeated laundry number, when the weight of the weight of the resin was 10 g/m2. (3) The spun yarn fabric, which has more fuzz than the filament yarn fabric, is more suitable for the fabric of fusible interlining. The smaller the cover factor difference between the face cloth and the interlining cloth, the stronger the exfoliation strength. (4) When the stability of the shape is a necessary factor in the consumption of the fusible interlining, a resin weight of 20 g/㎡ is the most suitable; however when stiffness and warmth are necessary factors, a resin weight of 10 g/㎡ is the most suitable.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
조경애 한국가족법학회 2018 가족법연구 Vol.32 No.3
There are two main systems of laws governing grounds for divorce: a fault-based divorce regime and a no-fault divorce regime. According to a fault-based divorce regime, in the process of filing for divorce, by asserting and proving fault on the part of the other spouse, there occurs a problem that couples become hostile to each other, slander the other party, exaggerate mistakes and reveal personal privacy. In response to these problems arising out of a fault-based divorce regime, a no-fault divorce regime has emerged. According to a no-fault divorce regime, grounds for divorce can be defined neutrally as the irretrievably breakdown, thereby this regime will be reducing the moral shame associated with divorce and alleviating the suffering and hostility that the parties might face during the divorce proceedings. Also, by involving no responsibility for the breakdown of marriage when judging whether marital relations are eliminated, it is possible to pursue a more mature divorce without unnecessary quarrels and perjuries which could occur during the divorce process and it is also possible to concentrate more on treatment and welfare for the parties or minor children who may be harmed by the divorce. In Korea, the modern divorce law was transplanted at the early stage of the Japanese colonial period. In the Civil Act, enacted from 1960s, ever since the divorce system has been defined by the system of dualization of both divorce by consent and judicial divorce in the same way as the divorce law under the Japanese colonial rule, this dual divorce law systems have been operated until now without changing the big frame. The provision on grounds for divorce for judicial divorce system, which has been practiced almost without revision for 60 years since its enactment, has limitation in a sense that it cannot accept the changed views on family and marriage. Grounds for divorce in Korea are based on a fault-based divorce regime, which cannot be free from the criticism such as it infringes the freedom of divorce, human dignity and the right to pursue happiness. In this regard, discussions have been actively conducted toward the need to introduce a no-fault divorce regime in law academia, in law practice, and in a section of a society, focusing on the issue of divorce claim by a guilty spouse. Hence, on June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court referred a guilty spouse's divorce claim case to en banc. In this thesis, it is concluded that it is difficult for the current provision on grounds for divorce to solve the problems arising out of the diversified grounds for divorce and judicial proceedings for divorce. In order to search for the introduction of a no-fault divorce regime, we conducted an empirical analysis through examining various theories and analysing tendency of precedent verdict of divorce, divorce statistics and consciousness survey. As a result, we confirmed that the theoretical doctrine which allows the introduction of a no-fault divorce regime has increased in recent years, and the precedent verdict of divorce also tends to broaden the range of exceptional approvals of a guilty spouse's divorce claim case. However, there are some opinions that subparagraph 6 of Article 840 of the Civil Act can be interpreted as a basis provision for a no-fault divorce regime and it is possible to approve the claim of divorce by a guilty spouse, only by active modification of the precedent verdict of divorce without amendment of the law itself. But these are unreasonable because it should have provided a system for protection of victims if subparagraph 6 would have been a provision for a no-fault divorce regime. There is a limit to broadening the scope of divorce approval to a divorce claim initiated by a guilty spouse based on subparagraph 6, and the divorce approval to such divorce claim initiated by a guilty spouse based on subparagraph 6 could have resulted in the tremendous increase in the number of victim of divorce. Therefore, the revi...
-
ScienceON
KISS연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
