http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
An equality constrained least squares approach to the structural reanalysis
장호종 대한수학회 2006 대한수학회지 Vol.43 No.6
An ecient method for reanalysis of a damaged struc-tures is presented. Perturbation analysis for the equality constra-ined least squares problem is adapted to handle structural reanaly-sis, and related theoretical and numerical results are presented.
러시아 한국학의 전개 및 발전 양상 : 인문학 분야의 연구사를 중심으로 Focused on History of Humanitarian Studies
장호종 한중인문학회 2006 한중인문학연구 Vol.17 No.-
러시아 한국학은 다양하고 수준 높은 역사적 성과와 교육·연구기관 및 학생 수가 증가하고 있는 현 상황에도 불구하고 앞으로의 전망이 불투명하다는 우려의 목소리가 높다. 현재 러시아 한국학은 러시아인 학자 및 교수가 줄어들고 있고, 내부적으로 연구를 위한 재정적인 지원이 뒷밤침되지 않고 있으며, 한국학 교재들이 현지 실정에 맞지 않거나 시대에 뒤떨어져 있는 등의 문제를 안고 있기 때문이다. 본고는 이러한 문제가 과거의 사실로부터 파생된 결과로 보고, 현 상황을 진단하여 그 처방을 마련하기 위한 한 방안으로 러시아 한국학의 전개와 발전 과정을 비판적으로 파악하고자 하였다. 이에 "조선을 대상으로 한 한국학(1910년 이전), 대상을 상실한 한국학(1910년~1945년), 북한을 대상으로 한 한국학(1945~1970년대), 대상에 대한 전환기로서의 한국학(1980년대), 남한을 대상으로 한 한국학(1990년 이후)"으로 러시아 한국학을 시대 구분하여 각 시기별로 주요한 업적들을 언급하고 시기별 특징을 확인하였다. 그리고 러시아 한국학의 문제점과 한계를 분석하여 그 대안을 일부 제시하고자 하였다. Although the history of Korean studies in Russia had shown numerous high-level results in the past, and even despite the fact that the number of educational and research institutions and the number of students are rising, many voices of concern urge that prospects for the future are not that bright. The reasons are: decreasing number of Russia-born professor and research staff in Korean studies, the lack of financial support from inside, the textbooks that don't match local conditions or fall very much behind of time, and other actual problems. Thus, we suggest critical reviewing of spread and stages of development of Korean studies in Russia, considering the problems to be originated in the past and wishing to make a step on the way to diagnose and cure the present-day Korean studies in Russia Korean Studies in Russia can be divided into following stages, while every stage had its important outcomes. 1) Choseon-oriented Korean Studies (before 1910) 2) Korean studies having lost an object (1910~1945) 3) North Korea-oriented Korean Studies (1945~1970's) 4) Korean Studies at the crossroads of choosing an object (1980's) 5) South Korea-oriented Korean Studies (after 1990) Furthermore the distinguishing features of these stages are as follows: 1) Korean studies in Russia started with approach of a few humanitarians having a simple interest in the topic, but then after it was found corresponding with nation's interests it greatly extended in fields of military history, politics, international relations. But because of Choseon's foreign policy of closing the country and usual for that time imperial approach of Russia, it was impossible to base Korean studies researches in Russia on cooperated efforts of two countries at that time. 2) After Korea lost it's sovereignty it disappeared as politic or diplomatic being, then revolution in Russia had disordered its inner state, and in consequence the research in related topic stagnated. On the other hand, studies of language and literature of Korean migrants had shown remarkable success, and philology of Korean, though appeared earlier, started step by step to take root. But since latter half of 1930's, due to forced deportation of Koreans living in Russia and outbreak of World War Ⅱ, the progress in humanitarian field of Korean studies also slowed. 3) After the termination of WWⅡ, the importance of North Korea and Korean peninsula was newly emphasized. Because interests of the state laid in spheres of domestic politics, economics, foreign politics, these fields of Korean studies were developing fast at the time. Besides, owe to state support language and historical studies also prospered. Through the 1960~1970's Korean studies in Russia from both quantitative and qualitative side grew up to world level, but exposed some problems connected to choice of research object and point of view. 4) Gorbachev's Renovation (Perestroika) and Open Policy program as well as Olympics in Seoul had shaken the process of choosing an object for Russian Koreanists. Especially humanitarian studies could hardly correspond with changing world and stagnated. And of course even if not social change, Russian inner economic collapse and thus great decrease of state support were the factors of shock that occurred in Korean studies in Russia. 5) Following the normalization of Russo-Korean relations and reestablishing friendly feelings about one another, Russian Korean studies started to change their sight. Even in social science de-ideologized researches formed the mainstream, and humanitarian studies have been greeting the new wave. But at this time, the new leap made by humanitarian studies doesn't look like a result of self-introspection. It was mainly caused by material and human resources support from Republic of Korea, and especially, financial support. That's why though that kind of research increased in numbers, from the point of quality it can be found standing on the start line. As it was shown Korean studies in Russia have a great lack in self-examination of it self's concept and scope. It is greatly influenced by outer challenge from period to period, and it is true that ability to answer this challenge is quite low. Also the trend shows that it can be trembled by outer reasons such as financial support. Accordingly from now on for active continuous progress of Korean studies in Russia the permanent material and human resources support from ROK is still necessary but we can conclude that it is also needed to harden the basic of Korea studies from inside.