http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
덩정라이(鄧正來)와 사회과학논쟁 -중국(법학)은 어디로 가야 하는가?
임상범 ( Sang Bum Lim ) 고려대학교 역사연구소 (구 역사학연구회) 2012 사총 Vol.76 No.-
Deng Zhenglai, A Hayek specialist, had a significant role in the debate among Chinese social scientists in the 90s, and yet currently there is no research on him in South Korea. Nonetheless he made important arguments in the fields of social and political sciences in China. He asked three questions. The first was on how to guarantee independence in creation of social science knowledge. The second was on how to create China`s own academic tradition. The last was on how the Chinese intelligent can contribute to the humanity`s future amid the current transformation of laws and social structure in China. For these questions, he suggested ``an ideal picture of the China Law,`` emphasizing the role of the political science in China in the era of globalization. Of course, at a first glance, the research of Deng Zhenglai seems to be an amalgamation of various Chinese and Western ideas. Further, he exaggerates his role and achievement directly and indirectly. This may result in questioning the originality of his academic achievement. However, the author believes such characteristics of Deng Zhenglai can help understand the modern Chinese people, sometimes contradictory and yet full of ambitions, and certain contemporary Chinese scholars who seem to exaggerate themselves.
임상범 ( Sangbum Lim ) 한국중국학회 2015 중국학보 Vol.71 No.-
The question about the future of China has a serious meaning in contemporary South Korea, because it is suspected that the achievement-oriented South Korean society will praise the exceptionality of Chinese Model and that the new ``Universal Values`` of China may interfere with the way of South Koreans`` lives. Therefore, the author thinks that even if China does not become the only global superpower, the frightening regional-power characteristics of ``Imperial China`` could be a threat to South Koreans`` lives. The author recognizes the necessity to put the contemporary China into perspective with the keyword ``empire,`` and to do this, the author looks into how the objective of the Chinese government and its intellectuals has progressed from ``Peaceful Rise`` to ``the Rise of the Great Powers`` and then to ``Chinese Dream.`` The author sees this progress as part of making ``Imperial China.`` The author focuses on the feelings and thoughts of the Chinese people themselves on the concept of an empire. More specifically, the author correlates ``Chinese Dream,`` the ideology promulgated by Xi Jinping, and the keyword ``empire,`` which some scholars are bringing up, to examine the contemporary Chinese reality.
사학부(史學部) : 20세기 전반기의 북경(北京) 도시사(都市史) 연구(硏究)
임상범 ( Sang Bum Lim ) 한국중국학회 2016 중국학보 Vol.75 No.-
The author is preparing for a research on Beijing in the first half of the 20th century. This article summarizes the research achievements so far in the field of the Urban History of Beijing by classifying them into Beijing``s urban space and ``Beijingren`` with their activities. While Urban History of Modern Beijing has many historical facts yet to be closely examined, the author``s focus in research of Beijing is to provide materials for a further study to the subject matter of ``resistance.`` The author predicts that, bystudying the efforts of ``Beijingren`` to preserve and restructuralize their identity amid the global waves of Capitalism and Imperialism in the first half of the 1900s shaking up Beijing, we can gain a different perspective for our own journey through the turmoil of the 21st century. For this, the author intends to first narrate a variety of incidents that occurred in the diversifying urban space of the early 20th century Beijing, then to close the article by looking at the life values of individual members of ``Beijingren``.
임상범(Lim Sangbum) 동양사학회 2009 東洋史學硏究 Vol.107 No.-
Research of late professor Mintuki represents where the Chinese Historian community in South Korea stands now. Mintugi's unique perspective was for a long time considered as the only possible way of studying Chinese History in South Korea. As perusing his life-long work of criticism on Chinese History which is seldom mentioned in current Korean intellectual community, I recognized the needs of seeing his researches in the context of Korean intellectual history, and the possibilities of applying the discourse of Chinese history to such a process. In order for this, I looked at the formation and advance of Mintukian History in the context of South Korean modern history, so as to understand the structure of his discourse of Chinese History. Mintuki lived through the latter half of the 20th century when Republic of Korea was founded and competed with North Korea to boast its superiority. Of course, he had compassion for humanity when he chose History as his profession, and his compassion surfaced as an interest in life of peoples. At the same time, he was liberal in a rather traditional sense, focusing on objective and positive methodologies. Nevertheless, in contemporary society where globalization is forced onto people, I think we need to view History from a different perspective than his. That is, to see how an abstract idea of a modern nation materialized in local everyday communities, and to see how marginalized communities and their constituents reacted to the external force -- what the modern nation meant to individuals who had to be liberated and respected. This repositioning of perspectives is to be done in the view of resistance and diversity.