카메라의 言語 - 몽타주작업을 위한 몇 에피소드

신철하 한국어문교육연구회 2019 어문연구 Vol.47 No.1

신철하, 2019, 카메라의 언어, 어문연구, 181 : 181~201 이 글은 몽타주와 쁠랑의 몇 개념을 바탕으로 영화의 현대성에 기여한 몽타주 이론을 실제 영화텍스트 분석을 통해 퍼포먼스 한다. 현대영화는 몽타주에 주목함으로써 보다 심도있는 영화적 완성도를 성취하고 있다. 이 과정에서 놓칠 수 없는 것이 편집이다. 편집은 몽타주의 시작이자 완성이라고 해도 과언이 아닐 만큼 영화작업의 순금 부분을 이룬다. 다시 말해 편집은 절단, 꼴라주, 허구적 연결을 통해 영화 전체를 완성해나가는 최종심급이라고 해도 과언이 아니다. 몽타주는 한편의 영화 속에서 어떤 리듬의 흐름 속에 있는 것이자, 갈등을 유발하는 훌륭한 기제이기도 하다. 또한 몽타주는 그 갈등의 충돌을 통해 유연하고, 극적이며, 상상이상의 방식으로 영화 전체를 ‘지각불가능한 세계’(질 들뢰즈)로 안내하는 역할을 함으로써, 근대와 함께 탄생한 새로운 대중의 기호에 가장 충실한 열광의 장르가 될 수 있었다. Based on a few concepts of Montage and Plan, this article performance the early montage theory that contributed to the modernity of the movie through real films. Contemporary films have achieved greater depth of cinematic perfection by paying attention to the montage. Editing is an essential part of this process. Editing is the beginning and completion of the montage. It occupies an important position in movie work. Editing is not an exaggeration to say that it is the Final course to complete the entire film through cutting, collage, and fictional connection. The montage is in the flow of a rhythm in the film of one side, and it is also an excellent mechanism to induce conflict. In addition, the montage is flexible, dramatic, through the conflict of the conflict, guiding the entire film to the "unrecognizable world"(Deleuze) in ways beyond imagination, so that the genre of the most fervent enthusiasm

중도론, 민족주의론의 정체와 지향 : 廉想涉의 批評

辛哲夏 한국언어문화학회 1987 한국언어문화 Vol.5 No.-

서사와 이미지 -「저녁의 게임」의 경우-

신철하 숙명여자대학교 한국어문화연구소 2011 한국어와 문화 Vol.10 No.-

김수영시와 '자유'의 문제 - 한국 현대문학의 생태학적 고찰

신철하 한국언어문학회 2005 한국언어문학 Vol.54 No.-

The ecological study of literature is focused on questioning about the prerequisite of the modernized life of human beings. At this stage, freedom has become the most important premise in maintaining the discipline of ecological conditions of the existence of mankind. Freedom itself nowadays is being extremely distorted and suppressed. In discarding these ecological conditions, we can think of the anarchistic freedom as one of the valuable alternatives. The anarchistic ecology by means of the model of self-control and self-administration can be superbly fused into the protection of literary ambiguity. The relation between ecological study and the problem of freedom in the poem under the category of ecological study of Korean modern literature, in which this writer is currently conducting researches, is well depicted in this writing. Kim Su Young is such an ecological poet who put maximum efforts to artfully go between the reality of language and its abstraction. His poetic life could be marked as the norm of ecological study of Korean modern literature, as he had pushed ahead the complexity of life and the poetry to the end of his life. In that sense, the abstruseness of the poems written by Kim Su Young should rather be interpreted as an ambiguity itself. This ambiguity is the essence of life to the author. Moreover, it is the essence of ecological freedom as well. Kim Su Young will be remembered for recording a Copernican adventure in the history of Korean modern literature by not only experiencing the theory of chaos, the essence of those ecological conditions, but also reflecting those experiences to the poems he wrote. Without it, he would have been just a poet of ecological freedom of the day and never be the "Alive Kim Su Young" like the way he is called by the people nowadays.

김수영시와 ‘자유’의 문제-한국 현대문학의 생태학적 고찰

신철하 한국언어문학회 2005 한국언어문학 Vol.54 No.-

The ecological study of literature is focused on questioning about the prerequisite of the modernized life of human beings. At this stage, freedom has become the most important premise in maintaining the discipline of ecological conditions of the existence of mankind. Freedom itself nowadays is being extremely distorted and suppressed. In discarding these ecological conditions, we can think of the anarchistic freedom as one of the valuable alternatives. The anarchistic ecology by means of the model of self-control and self-administration can be superbly fused into the protection of literary ambiguity. The relation between ecological study and the problem of freedom in the poem under the category of ecological study of Korean modern literature, in which this writer is currently conducting researches, is well depicted in this writing. Kim Su Young is such an ecological poet who put maximum efforts to artfully go between the reality of language and its abstraction. His poetic life could be marked as the norm of ecological study of Korean modern literature, as he had pushed ahead the complexity of life and the poetry to the end of his life. In that sense, the abstruseness of the poems written by Kim Su Young should rather be interpreted as an ambiguity itself. This ambiguity is the essence of life to the author. Moreover, it is the essence of ecological freedom as well. Kim Su Young will be remembered for recording a Copernican adventure in the history of Korean modern literature by not only experiencing the theory of chaos, the essence of those ecological conditions, but also reflecting those experiences to the poems he wrote. Without it, he would have been just a poet of ecological freedom of the day and never be the “Alive Kim Su Young” like the way he is called by the people nowadays.

문학ㆍ이데올로기ㆍ형식 : 「광장」에 접근하는 한 방식

신철하 한양대학교 한국학연구소 2000 韓國學論集 Vol.34 No.-

문학과 이념 : The Death Problem in Kim Ki-Jeen's Novels 김기진 소설에서 '죽음'의 문제

신철하 한양대학교 한국학연구소 1996 韓國學論集 Vol.29 No.-

한국 현대문학의 생태학적 고찰

신철하 상허학회 2006 상허학보 Vol.16 No.-

The ecological study of literature could be defined as a cultural response to the socio-culture shock of the modern times. In this writing, based on the premise that the most dynamic and sharpest keyword for the contemporary aesthetics is the ecological ground, the writer carefully tries to analyze and explain three texts which are believed to be formulating the aesthetic hierarchy of the above. The core of that explanation is composed of ‘double-binding’ and ‘Bul-yeon-gi-yeon’. Kim Su Young is such a poet who successfully sublimated the expression of freedom by literature of which he had been pursuing continuously into ecological aesthetics. The abstruseness of the poems written by Kim Su Young should be defined as another expression of ambiguity, whichis the essence of life to the author. His language closely approaches the essence of ecology, of which the indigenous language contains. This effort stands against the issue on the “speed” of the modern literature, but at the same time, it is filled with the ecological rules of composition. On the other hand, the most meaningful and important issue of Kim Ji Ha’s definition of life could be compressed to a word, ‘Yul-ryeo’. Yul-ryeo, a form of cultural movement and practice of culture, introduces the Copernican revolution about modern understanding of life to the people of the same age. In conclusion, the ultimate objects of this writing through concrete construction of the texts are the ecological leap and dimensional qualitative change. Keyword : ecological Literature, double binding, Bul-yeon-gi-yeon, Yul- ryeo, mbiguity, Kim soo yeong, Lee Mun Goo, Kim ji ha 문학생태학은 탈(후기) 근대의 사회문화적 충격에 대한 문학적 반응이다. 이 글은 동시대 미학의 가장 첨예하고도 역동적인 키워드가 생태적 사유라는 전제를 통해, 그것의 미학적 위계를 정치하게 형식화하고 있다고 판단되는 세 개의 텍스트를 면밀하게 분석하고 해석한다. 그 해석의 핵을 이루는 것은 이중구속론과double binding 不然其然Bulyeongiyeon이다. 김수영은 그가 추구한 자유의 문학적 실천을 가장 높은 단계의 생태학적 미학으로 승화한 시인이다. 그가 시도한 언어적 난해성은 그런 의미에서 애매성ambiguity의 다른 표현이며, 그것이 김수영적 생명론의 본질이다. 이문구의 언어는 토착어가 함유하고 있는 생태학적 본질에 다가가고자 노력한다. 그 노력은 근대적 속도에 길항(拮抗)하면서 그것을 뛰어넘으려는 생태적 문법으로 충만 해 있다. 한편, 김지하의 생명론이 표상하는 화두는 율려Yul-ryeo로 압축된다. 문화운동이자 문학적 실천이기도 한 그것은 동시대인들에게 근대적 생명관에 대한 코페르니쿠스적 전회(轉回)를 설득한다.그리하여 구체적 텍스트 해석을 관통하면서 이 글이 노리는 것은 궁극적으로 생태담론 논의의 비약적 도약과 차원의 질적 전화(轉化)이다. SUMMARY

비평과 생태학적 비평-현단계 생태비평의 좌표

신철하 상허학회 2007 상허학보 Vol.21 No.-

새로운 시대적 감수성에 대한 호응과 근대 이데올로기가 파장한 유무형의 모순을 생태적 사유는 성찰적 명제로 내재화한다. 현 단계 생태비평의 최고 위계를 김지하, 장회익, 김종철, 문순홍의 담론들은 개성적으로 보여준다. 문순홍의 생태비평이 지향하는 키워드는 생물지역론과 생태여성론이며, 그 궁극은 녹색사회이다. 장회익의 온생명론은 나쁜 의미에서의 과학주의가 안고 있는 지적 폐쇄성과 사회적 그것에 대한 통렬한 성찰이자 새 과학문화를 향한 외침이다. 김지하의 ‘율려’와 김종철의 교양주의는 직관과 삶의 체득으로 파악한 우리사회의 대안문화운동으로 명명된다. 그런 면에서 양자의 생태담론은 더 나은 삶과 세계를 향한 새로운 휴머니즘의 옹호이기도 하다. Ecological deliberation has its own inherent introspective hypothesis on the tangible and intangible inconsistencies derive from the responses to new era sensitivity and contemporary ideology. The discourses of Kim Ji-ha, Jang Hoi-ik, Kin Jong-chul and Moon Soon-hong illustrate the hierarchy of ecological criticism of the present stage along with their personal touches. The keywords of eco-criticism by Moon Soon-hong are eco-regionalism and eco-feminism, and it ulti- mately aims at the ‘green society’. The theory of global life by Jang Hoi-ik is the intellectual closure which scientific possesses, bitter intro- spection on that of society and cry for the new scientific culture. ‘Yul- Yeo’ by Kim Ji-ha and intellectual inclination by Kim Jong-chul are designated as the alternative cultural movements of our society. In that sense, the ecological discourses of these two writers could be considered as their support to the new humanism to reach the better life and world.

[특집-총론] 미완의 시대와 문학

신철하 실천문학 2006 실천문학 Vol.84 No.-