시뮬레이션 활용 자율주행 성능 평가를 위한 운전자 모델 기반 교통류 시나리오 생성

문대영(Daeyoung Moon),전승민(Seungmin Jeon),이기범(Kibeom Lee) 한국자동차공학회 2023 한국자동차공학회 학술대회 및 전시회 Vol.2023 No.11

자율주행 자동차의 안전한 평가를 위한 디지털 트윈 및 가상 환경 기반 Vehicle-In-the-Loop Simulation(VILS) 시스템 아키텍처

문대영(Daeyoung Moon),김정현(Junghyun Kim),이민기(Minki Lee),홍준(Jun Hong),이기범(Kibeom Lee) 한국자동차공학회 2022 한국자동차공학회 학술대회 및 전시회 Vol.2022 No.11

초등 메이커 교육에서 팅커링(tinkering)의 의미와 유형 탐색

문대영(Daeyoung Moon) 한국실과교육학회 2023 한국실과교육학회지 Vol.36 No.1

이 연구는 초등 메이커 교육의 맥락에서 팅커링의 의미를 탐색하고, 초등 메이커 교육에 적용 가능한 팅커링 유형을 확인하기 위해 수행되었다. 연구의 목적을 달성하기 위해서 팅커링 관련 문헌 고찰을 통해 팅커링의 의미를 탐색하고 팅커링의 유형을 분류하여 도출하였다. 또한, 초등 메이커 교육에 적용 가능한 팅커링 유형에 대한 타당도를 검증하였다. 이 연구의 주요 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 초등 메이커 교육에서 팅커링의 의미를 1) 브리콜뢰르로서의 팅커링, 2) 메이커 활동의 한 분야로서 팅커링, 3) 문제 해결과 놀이로서의 팅커링, 4) 학습 과정으로서의 팅커링 등과 같은 네 가지 관점에서 탐색하였다. 둘째, 초등 메이커 교육에 적용할 수 있는 팅커링 유형을 1) 문제 해결하기, 2) 조작·표현하기, 3) 관찰·탐색하기, 4) 분해·조립하기 등의 네 가지 유형으로 구분하여 제시하였다. 또한, 각 유형의 팅커링에는 1) 손으로(with hands), 2) 놀이하듯(like playing), 3) 스스로 결정하며 (self-determined), 4) 계속 시도하는(try over and over), 5) 학습 과정 (learning process) 등과 같은 공통 요소가 전제 조건으로서 반영되어야 할 것을 제안하였다. This study was conducted to explore the meaning of tinkering in the context of elementary maker education and to identify the types of tinkering applicable to elementary maker education. To achieve this purpose, the meanings of tinkering were elucidated from a review of related literature and the types of tinkering were classified and derived. In addition, the validity of tinkering types applicable to elementary maker education was verified. The main findings of this study were as follows: First, the meaning of tinkering in elementary maker education was interpreted from the following four perspectives: 1) tinkering as bricoleur, 2) tinkering as a discipline of maker activity, 3) tinkering as problem-solving and play, and 4) tinkering as a learning process. Second, the types of tinkering that could be applied in elementary maker education were presented as the following four types: 1) problem-solving, 2) manipulation/expression, 3) observation/exploration, and 4) disassembly/assembly. In addition, the results suggested that the following common elements should be reflected as prerequisites for each type of tinkering: 1) with hands, 2) similar to playing, 3) self-determined, 4) try again, and 5) learning process.

초·중등 발명교육 정책 변천에 관한 연구

문대영(Daeyoung Moon) 한국기술교육학회 2022 한국기술교육학회지 Vol.22 No.1

이 연구는 발명교사의 인식을 바탕으로 우리나라 초·중등 발명교육 정책의 변천을 탐색하기 위해 수행되었다. 연구의 목적을 달성하기 위해서 우리나라 초·중등 발명교육의 주요 정책 40개를 도출하여 질문지를 구성하고, 발명교육 경력 10년 이상인 발명교사를 대상으로 조사를 실시하였다. 연구의 주요 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 발명교사가 인식하는 우리나라 초·중등 발명교육 정책의 변곡점은 1) 1995년 교육부 및 시·도교육청과 연계한 발명공작교실(現발명교육센터) 설치, 2) 2007년 학교 정규 교육과정에 발명교육 반영, 3) 2017년 발명교육법(발명교육의 활성화 및 지원에 관한 법률) 공포 등의 3개 정책이다. 둘째, 위의 3개 정책을 변곡점으로 하여 우리나라 초·중등 발명교육 정책은 1) 도입기(1973∼1994), 2) 성장기(1995∼2006), 3) 확산기(2007∼2016), 4) 성숙기(2017∼) 등으로 시기 구분할 수 있다. This study was conducted to explore the changes of primary and secondary invention education policy in Korea based on the recognition of the invention teachers. To achieve the purpose of this study, 40 major policies of elementary and secondary invention education in Korea were derived and questionnaires were constructed. Invention teachers with more than 10 years of invention education experience were surveyed. The main results of this study are as follows:First, the inflection point of the Korean elementary and secondary invention education policy recognized by the invention teachers is three policies: 1) the establishment of the invention work classroom (invention education center) in 1995, 2) the reflection of invention education in the regular school curriculum in 2007, and 3) the invention education law (the Act on the Activation and Support of Invention Education) in 2017. Second, the above three policies can be divided into four periods of elementary and secondary invention education policy in Korea: 1) Introduction period (1973∼1994), 2) Growth period (1995∼2006), 3) Diffusion period (2007∼2016), and 4) Maturity period (2017∼).

생명공학 관련 특허의 성립성과 In re Bilski 사건

최승재(Choi, Sung Jai),문대영(Daeyoung Moon) 세창출판사 2010 창작과 권리 Vol.- No.59

In 2008, the en banc bench of the Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit made its ruling on In re Bilski case. With the decision, the 12 judge panel suggested the new principle for the patentability named as the Machine or Transformation Rule(MOT Rule) and narrowed down the spectrum of the patentable subject matter which had once been broadened since the State Street Bank case of 1998. The new standard is now considered as firm in America. In consideration of the Federal circuit's change of attitude toward the patentability, this paper covered the case's effects on biotechnology patent. For that, several special issues on the biotechnology patent were dealt with, separated from the general patentability issues. Then, leading cases about the biotechnology patent were looked closely in connection with the Court's 2008 decision. Furthermore, the oral argument session of the Bilski case in front of the U.S. Supreme Court helped inferring certain possibilities. At the end, this paper derived four conclusions. First, the Classen case and the Prometheus case show that the Federal Circuit has been applying the MOT Rule to the biotechnology patents as well as the Business Method patents. The only difference is that the Circuit reads the term 'transformation' differently when it faces the biotech. Second, the Supreme court judges already shows their doubt about the MOT Rule, and reveals that they are aware of the need to handle the biotechnology field distinctly. Third, the impact of the Bilski case seems to get tougher, even it is to the attack against the biotechology patent itself. Fourth, the implications of the Bilski on Korean patent system would be more serious on the biotechnology rather than its original field of Business Method. In summary, the Supreme court's forthcoming decision on Bilski case will affects not only on the patentability examination standard, but also on the application standard of the patentability examination to the biotechnology patent. And it will gives a change to reconsider the Korean patent system, especially whether the definition of invention is suit for the new technology.

디지털 트윈 기반 시뮬레이터를 활용한 VILS 구축

정지원(Jiwon Jung),고명근(Myeounggeun Ko),권병헌(Byeongheon Kwon),문대영(Daeyoung Moon),홍준(Jun Hong) 한국자동차공학회 2021 한국자동차공학회 학술대회 및 전시회 Vol.2021 No.11

ROS(Robot Operating System) 기반 자율주행 배송 플랫폼 아키텍쳐 설계

손영광(Younggwang Son),정경섭(kyeongsub Jeong),노승현(Seunghyeon Noh),이주현(Juhyeon Lee),문대영(Daeyoung Moon),심우현(Woohyun Sim),주형진(Hyeongjin Joo),전영훈(Younghoon Jeon),김범준(Beomjoon Kim),이기범(Kibeom Lee) 한국자동차공학회 2020 한국자동차공학회 학술대회 및 전시회 Vol.2020 No.11

Recently, there is a lot of demand for non-face-to-face food and parcel delivery. The autonomous delivery platforms require high-level autonomous driving technology to drive on general roads and cope with unexpected situations. However, much research has not been conducted compared to autonomous vehicles (AV). Autonomous delivery platforms are equipped with various sensors such as LiDAR, Camera, GPS, and IMU. Such sensors need to select the optimal equip position and angle according to the size or shape of the platform. Also, in order to implement an autonomous delivery system, various driving algorithms are required and integration of each element algorithm is essential. In this research, a variable platform is designed to easily set the position to optimize the sensor performance. An autonomous driving algorithm structure for modularization is developed.

실업계 고등학교 학생의 대학 '동일계열 정원 외 특별전형' 운영 방안

문대영,류창열 충남대학교 공업교육연구소 2002 論文集 Vol.25 No.1

The purpose of this study was to propose a plan to enforce the special admission system of same majors' for vocational high school students. To perfom this study, questionnaire method was used and the data were collected by mail. The return rate were 62.6%(vocational high school ), 51.3%(college), and 48.1%(university) respectively. The statistical techniques used for data analysis was descriptive statistics like as frequency distribution, mean and standard deviation. The major findings in this study were as follows: 1)Qualification for application and standard of admission as a plan to enforce the special admission system of same majors were proposed. 2)Some problems as lack of ability to study, abnormal management of curriculum, confusion of range about some majors, and the validity of admission were drawn out. 3)Some alternative proposal as intensification of records in school, strengthen of accomplishment test in special subject, open and share of information about range of same majors, and introduce monitoring system were proposed.