http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
김성조,이만상,류택규,김운성,윤기운,백승화,Kim, Seong-Jo,Lee, Man-Sang,Ryu, Taek-Kyu,Kim, Un-Sung,Yoon, Ki-Woun,Baek, Seung-Hwa 한국환경농학회 1994 한국환경농학회지 Vol.13 No.1
수질오염에 따른 Cu의 함량변화 차이를 구명하기 위하여 도시하수 및 공단배출수의 영향을 받는 만경강 유역의 논 토양을 중심으로 1982년도에 표 심토로 구분 채취한 것과 1990년도에 채취한 토양시료를, 그리고 1990년의 토양 시료채취 지역에서 재배된 수도체시료 중 Cu 함량을 분석하였다. 만경강 유역의 토양 중 Cu함량은 5.20-71.70mg $kg^{-1}$였다. 평균함량은 1990년도 토양 중의 것이 1982년도 토양에서 보다 높았다. 도시하수 유입지역으로 부터 거리 별 함량변화가 1982년보다 1990년도 토양이 보다 규칙적으로 감소되는 변화를 나타냈다. 수도체의 엽신부위의 Cu함량과 토양중의 Cu, Zn 및 Pb의 함량간에 유의성이 인정되었다. 토양 중 Cu 함량과 토양 중 Zn 및 Pb 함량간에 유의한 상관관계를 나타내고 있어서 Cu가 이들 금속들과 함께 유입되는 오염물질 임을 나타냈다. 이 지역에서 재배된 현미중 Cu함량의 범위는 0.4-10.1 mg $kg^{-1}$이었고, 수도체 부위중 최고 Cu함량은 화서축으로 현미에 비하여 2.3배 높았으며, 엽초 중의 Cu함량은 토양 중 Zn 및 Pb 함량과 상관관계를 나타냈다. To investigate differences with the polluted sources on Cu contents in soils and paddy rices under water pollutions, soils with the distance, the surface(0-15㎝ depth) and subsurface(15-30㎝ depth) in 1982 and 1990, and rice plants at the soil sampling sites in 1990 were separately sample at Mangyeong River area under the influence of municipal and industrial waste water from Jeonju city. Soil samples were extracted with $4M-HNO_3$ and plant samples were digested with mixture of $HNO_3$ and $HClO_4$ for analyzing Cu, Cd, Zn, Pb by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Cu contents in soils ranged from 5.20 to 71.70 mg $kg^{-1}$. Average Cu level in 1990 was higher than that in 1982. Variation of Cu content with the distances from the source of waste water in 1990 was more regularly decreased than that in 1982. A significant correlation was observed between Cu contents in leaf sheath of rice plant and Cu, Zn and Pb contents in soils. Cu contents in soil was correlated with Zn and Pb in soil at area affected by waste water, regardless of years and soil depths. Cu contents in brown rice ranged from 0.4 to 10 mg $kg^{-1}$, and it was the lowest in parts of rice plant, and Cu content in panicle axis was 2.3 times higher than that in brown rice.
개설효과에 의한 임도의 유형구분 - 기설임도의 (旣設林道) 분석을 중심으로 -
전경수,이종락,류택규 ( Kyung Soo Jeon,Jong Lak Lee,Taek Kyu Ryu ) 한국산림과학회 1994 한국산림과학회지 Vol.83 No.2
The critical need of forest road for enchanting the additional values of various forest products, in addition, giving more recreational opportunity to citizen, has been recognized. In this study the present author aimed to ascertain the most effective construction working plan of forest road being tit to Korean geographic condition. To execute this research program, four locations in national forest of Kangweon-do district and other four locations in private forest in Chollabuk-do district both where forest roads have previously been constructed were selected to analyze the effectiveness basing upon the various factors separately or in combination. The results are summarized as follows ; 1. The investment efficiency in forest road construction showed to increase in the area where terrain factors and district social factors rate is high, and to decrease in the area where forest status factors and forest road structure factors rate is high. So in future the Forest Resource Development Model of forest road should take more importance particularly on those area having terrain factor ratio is low. The extractable value of constructed forest road based on forest status factors rate is expected to increase in case of high considerably . 2. To construct of forest road for increasing multiple use of forests, forest road should be construct with priority on area where obtained total score by evaluation factors is high. And these evaluation factors should ta4:e possible determine the position of forest road construction. 3. The following five types of forest road basing upan function performance are suggested with regard to the place where road is constructed. (1) Forest Utilization Model : where forest status factors and forest road structure factors rate are over 60% . (2) Forest Resource Development Model ; where terrain factors, forest status factors, forest road structure factors and district social factors rate are less than 60%. (3) Community Development Model : where terrain factors, forest road structure factors and district social factors rate are over 60% but forest status factors rate are less than 60%. (4) Recreation and Health Model ; where terrain factors, forest status factors, forest road structure factors and district social factors rate are over 60%. (5) Multiple Use Model ; where both forest status factors and district social factors rate are over 60% .