RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재

        2015 개정 중학교 역사 교육과정의 내용 구성 방식과 그 특징

        남한호 ( Nam Han-ho ) 역사교육학회 2016 역사교육논집 Vol.60 No.-

        Contents of 2015 revised history curriculum secure sequences of middle and high schools and are rationalized so are constructed depending on logic to lighten the academic pressure. In content organization, middle school history is organized by focusing on a subject, so is different from Korean history in high school constructed with syntax structure focusing on political history. In content construction, middle school history, Korean history in high school, world history, and East Asian history are divided into five fields, and a method that big idea(key concept) is made as an organizer of contents so is made as the central axis penetrating grade is selected. Five results that content construction of 2015 revised middle school history curriculum is analyzed by focusing on characteristics and problems of key competencies becoming a reference frame of a curriculum, big idea playing a role of a content organizer, and validity of content construction focusing on a subject can be arranged. First, a clear concept of key competencies is not agreed yet. In addition, there is no significant differences between key subject competences suggested in a history curriculum and historical thinking, and key subject competences are also impertinent to be made as standards of content selection and construction of a curriculum. Second, ‘big idea(key concept)’ suggested as a frame of content construction is a super ordinate concept involving various concepts, so content elements based on individually historical truths are selected as key concept in comparison to a constituting principle of a curriculum enabling deep learning as an organizer combining fields in a subject, so it goes against a principle of a curriculum. Key concept constituting fields has the meaning of simple content elements, and is closer to characteristic as a subject rather than a concept. In addition, it is difficult to find a community combining Korean history and world history, and the meaning as an organizer connecting historical contents is weak. Third, the intention to constitute historical contents in middle school by focusing on a subject is to differentiate contents in middle school from contents in high school. However, when a study on a sequence method is referred, it is organized by focusing on a subject in middle school because syntax structure understanding the flow of history is better fitted for a method retrogressing an understanding of students in middle school. A subject is the meaning as learning experience that students can investigate a particular subject deeply in the learning process rather than a content construction principle of a curriculum, so is impertinent to be made as a content construction principle of a curriculum. Fourth, if detailed purposes, field system table, and achievement standards of a history curriculum are examined, a difference of content construction between middle school history and Korean history in high school is not clear, and there is a problem that political history should be repeated for elementary, middle, and high schools. Fifth, a method to reduce scope and contents treated in a world history field is selected to lighten academic pressure of students. As a result, the world history field does not treat history except for Chinese history, European history, and some of Japanese history in middle school history. This is because the reality of history education is not properly understood, so finally, this will cause desolation of world history education.

      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재

        창의적 사고력 신장을 위한 고등학교 국사 교과서 <심화 과정>의 분석

        이문기,남한호 경북대학교 사범대학부속 중등교육연구소 2003 중등교육연구 Vol.51 No.2

        The purpose of this study is to find a more effective way to develop and encourage historical and creative thought among high-school students studying history. 7th national curriculum focuses on the importance of understanding core knowledge, acquiring inquiry skills and encouraging higher -level thought. But, the Korean history textbook and 'advanced course' currently used in high school focuses mainly on picking up facts, and simply reading given materials limits the development of historical and creative thinking. 'Advanced course' in the subject, while curriculum differentiation on the basis of students' academic characteristics is applied, is good for developing higher level thinking, that is, historical thinking and creative thinking, as it enhances the achievement of students, who reach basic achievement level, on the same or expanded status of the subject.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼