RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        중국 무역보험 민영화문제에 관한 연구: 선진국과의 비교분석을 중심으로

        주령커(Ling-Ke Zhou),김해진(Hai-Zhen Jinb) 한국무역연구원 2016 무역연구 Vol.12 No.6

        Although China has become a major trade power in the world, there are many shortcomings in the Chinese trade support systems including Chinese trade insurance system. Therefore, how to improve the Chinese trade insurance system has become a hot issue nowadays. In some of the latest studies, a method of privatization of trade insurance companies has been proposed. Up to now, there are three biggest privatized trade insurance companies in the world. They are Euler Hermes in Germany, Atradius in Netherlands, and COFACE in France. In this paper, necessary conditions for trade insurance privatization are examined according to the experiences of three privatized trade insurance companies: Euler Hermes (Germany), Atradius (Netherlands) and COFACE (France). These privatization requirements are then compared with trade insurance companies in China, in particular, whether Chinese trade insurance companies possess the necessary requirements for privatization or not. Consequently, we answer the question as to whether privatization is the right way to improve the Chinese trade insurance system in this study.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼